THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

SUMMER OUTDOOR THERMAL COMFORT IN MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING: COMBINING MICROCLIMATE INDICATORS WITH HUMAN THERMAL SENSATION

ABSTRACT
The paper examines outdoor thermal comfort in summer in the multi-family housing area Duvanište in the city of Niš, Serbia, combining objective and subjective evaluation assessments. Objective evaluation obtained field measurements of microclimatic parameters at selected sites and mean radiant temperature, predicted mean vote, and psychological equivalent temperature calculation using RayMan software. Subjective methodology assessment is performed using survey questionnaires based on thermal sensation vote and overall comfort vote. The paper aims to find the correlation between measured and calculated parameters on one side and Thermal Sensation Vote values. The results show that air temperature significantly correlates to human thermal sensation in the subject area. Obtained results also indicate high prediction accuracy of psychological equivalent temperature in the outdoor thermal comfort evaluation in summer. Finally, to feel comfortable, neither warm nor cold, in continental climate regions with hot summer conditions, the neutral psychological equivalent temperature should be between 15-24.3 ℃.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2022-05-31
PAPER REVISED: 2022-09-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2022-09-20
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2022-10-08
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI220531150S
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2023, VOLUME 27, ISSUE Issue 3, PAGES [2399 - 2412]
REFERENCES
  1. Johansson, E., et al., Instruments and methods in outdoor thermal comfort studies - The need for standardization, Urban Climate, 10 (2014), pp. 346-366.
  2. Zhu, Z., et al., Summer Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Urban Commercial Pedestrian Streets in Severe Cold Regions of China, Sustainability, 12(5), 2020, pp. 1876.
  3. Nikolopoulou, M., et al., Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Understanding the human parameter, Solar Energy, 70(3), (2001), pp. 227-235.
  4. Fanger, P.O., Thermal comfort, Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press, 1970.
  5. ASHRAE standard 55 „Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy", (2017), Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
  6. Kajtar, L., et al., Objective and subjective thermal comfort evaluation in Hungary, Thermal Science, 21(3), (2017), pp. 1409-1418.
  7. Taleghani, M., et al., Outdoor thermal comfort within five different urban forms in the Netherlands, Building, and Environment, 83 (2015), pp. 65-78.
  8. Chen, L., Ng, E., Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: A review of research in the past decade, Cities, 29 (2012), pp. 118-125.
  9. Kantor, N., et al., Human bioclimatological evaluation with an objective and subjective approaches on the thermal conditions of a square in the center of Szeged, Acta Climatologica et Chronologica, 40-41 (2007), pp. 47-58.
  10. Zhao, L., et al., Study on outdoor thermal comfort on campus in a subtropical urban area in summer, Sustainable Cities and Society, 22 (2016), pp. 164-170.
  11. Huang, J., et al., Outdoor thermal environments and activities in open space: An experiment study in humid subtropical climates, Building and Environment, 103 (2016), pp. 238-249.
  12. Yin, Q., et al., Research on outdoor thermal comfort of high-density urban center in severe cold area, Building and Environment, 200 (2021), pp. 107938.
  13. Cortesao, J., et al., Photographic comparison: a method for qualitative outdoor thermal perception surveys, International Journal of Biometeorology, 64 (2020), pp. 173-185.
  14. Tian, Y., et al., Factors influencing resident and tourist outdoor thermal comfort: A comparative study in China's cold region, Science of the Total Environment 808 (2022), pp. 152079.
  15. Lai, D., et al., Studies of outdoor thermal comfort in northern China, Building and Environment 77 (2014), pp. 110-118.
  16. Zhang, L., et al., Outdoor Thermal Comfort of Urban Park - A Case Study, Sustainability 12 (2020), pp. 1961.
  17. Wei, D., et al., Variations in outdoor thermal comfort in an urban park in the hot-summer and cold-winter region of China, Sustainable Cities and Society, 77 (2022), pp. 103535.
  18. Zhen, M., et al., Urban outdoor thermal comfort in western China, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 20, 2 (2021), doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1782210
  19. Xi, T., Li, Q., Mochida, A., Meng, Q. Study on outdoor thermal comfort on a campus in a subtropical urban area in summer, Building and Environment, 52 (2012),pp. 162-170.
  20. Adunola, A.O., Evaluation of urban residential thermal comfort in relation to indoor and outdoor air temperatures in Ibadan, Nigeria, Building and Environment, 75 (2014), pp. 190-205.
  21. Matallah, M.E., et al., Prediction of Climate Change Effect on Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Arid Region, Energies, 14 (2021), pp. 4710.
  22. Elshafei, G., et al., Green building outdoor thermal comfort in hot-desert climatic region, Cogent Engineering, 9, 1(2022), published online, doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2046681
  23. Brankov B., Stanojević A., Differentiation of the usability of common outdoor spaces in multi-family housing, Proceedings of the International Scientific-Professional Conference 16th Summer School of Urbanism, Prolom Banja, Serbia, 2020, pp. 143-152. (In Serbian).
  24. Lukić, M., et al., Assessment of Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Serbia's Urban Environments during Different Seasons, Atmosphere, 12 (2021), pp. 1084.
  25. Đekić, J., et al., Thermal comfort of pedestrian spaces and the influence of pavement materials on warming up during summer, Energy and Buildings, 159 (2018), pp. 474-485.
  26. Bogdanović-Protić, I.S., et al., Forecasting of outdoor thermal comfort index in urban open spaces: The Nis fortress case study, Thermal Science, vol. 20, no.5 (2016), pp. 1531-1539.
  27. Auliciems, A., Szokolay, S.V., Thermal comfort, 2nd edition, Brisbane: Department of Architecture, The University of Queensland, 2007.
  28. McIntyre, D.A., Indoor Climate, London: Applied Science Publishers, 1980.
  29. Matzarakis, A., et al., Modelling Radiation Fluxes in Simple and Complex Environments - Application of the RayMan Model, Int. J. Biometeorol., 51 (2007), 4, pp. 323-334.
  30. Guideline VDI 3789, Part 2, Environmental Meteorology - Interactions between Atmosphere and Surfaces, VDI-Handbuch Reinhaltung der Luft, Bd. 1, Beuth, Berlin, 1994.
  31. Guideline VDI 3787, Part 2, Environmental Meteorology - Methods for the Human Biometeorological Evaluation of Climate and Air Quality for Urban and Regional Planning at Regional Level, Part 1: Climate. Beuth, Berlin, 2008.
  32. Matzarakis, A., et al., Developments and applications of thermal indices in urban structures by RayMan and Sky Helios model, ICUC9 9th Inter. Conf. on Urban Climate, France, 2015., pp. 1-6.
  33. Bernard J., et al., Sky View Factor Calculation in Urban Context: Computational Performance and Accuracy Analysis of Two Open and Free GIS Tools, Climate, vol. 6, no.3, (2018), pp.60
  34. Höppe P., The physiological equivalent temperature: a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment, Intern. Jour. of Biometeor., 43 (1999), pp. 71-75.
  35. Matzarakis, A., Mayer, H., Another Kind of Environmental Stress: Thermal Stress. WHO Collaborating Centre for Air Quality Management and Air Pollution Control, NEWSLETTERS, 18 (1996), pp. 7-10.

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence