THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

PAHs emission from cigar burner combustion system and comparison of PAHs content in fly ashes

ABSTRACT
Agricultural biomass is considered a preferred renewable energy source in Serbia because of its availability and suitability to limit the use of fossil fuel resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, constant work has been done to develop technologies that enable its utilization for energy purposes. As an example of these efforts, in the Agricultural Corporation PKB, the soybean straw cigarette-type combustion system has been applied for greenhouse heating for over a decade. However, many volatile and semivolatile organic compounds are emitted directly into the atmosphere or concentrated in ash particles during agricultural biomass combustion. Since some of the emitted compounds, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), are toxic, monitoring their concentrations in fly ash is recommended. Literature data regarding PAHs content in agricultural biomass ashes are insubstantial, especially in Serbia. For that purpose, PAHs contents in the cyclone (CB) and stack (SB) fly ashes of soybean straw were investigated and compared. In addition, the emission factors, toxicity, carcinogenicity and benzo[a]pyrene equivalence concentrations were determined and used to estimate the potential environmental impact of these ashes. As a result, SB ash has been shown to have a higher potential environmental risk than CB ash. Hence, an assessment of using soybean straw as a feed fuel in a real cigarette-type combustion plant regarding PAHs emission is given. These results provide important information for optimizing combustion conditions and assisting the local entities in managing air pollution and control policies in Serbia.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2022-06-16
PAPER REVISED: 2022-08-08
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2022-08-17
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2022-09-10
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI220616138M
REFERENCES
  1. de Wit, M., Faaij, A., European biomass resource potential and costs, Biomass and Bioenergy, 34 (2010), 2, pp. 188-202, doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.011.
  2. Saidur, R., et al., A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (2011), 5, pp. 2262-2289, doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.015.
  3. Repić, B.S., et al., Investigation of the cigar burner combustion system for baled biomass, Biomass and Bioenergy, 58 (2013), pp. 10-19, doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.016.
  4. Zabaniotou Anastasia, A., et al., Investigation study for technological application of alternative methods for the energy exploitation of biomass/agricultural residues in Northern Greece, Thermal Science, 11 (2007), 3, pp. 115-123, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI0703115Z.
  5. Lalak-Kańczugowska, J., et al., Comparison of selected parameters of biomass and coal, International Agrophysics, 30 (2016), pp. 475-482, doi.org/10.1515/intag-2016-0021.
  6. Nielsen, O.-K., et al., EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Energy industries, Report No. 1.A.1., European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019.
  7. Nielsen, O.-K., et al., EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Small combustion, Report No. 1. A.4, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019.
  8. Nielsen, O.-K., et al., EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Manufacturing industries and construction (combustion), Report No. 1. A.2, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019.
  9. Ross, A., et al., Measurement and prediction of the emission of pollutant from the combustion of coal and biomass in a fixed bed furnace, Fuel, 81 (2002), 5, pp. 571-582, doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00157-0.
  10. Čepić, Z.M., Nakomčić-Smaragdakis, B.B., Experimental analysis of the influence of air-flow rate on wheat straw combustion in a fixed bed, Thermal Science, 21 (2017), 3, pp. 1443-1452, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160403261C.
  11. Lazaras, I.J., et al., Evaluation of boiler performance with using of bio-ethanol absorbed wood pellets, Thermal Science, 26 (2021), 2, pp. 931-936, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200906216J.
  12. Urošević, D.M., Gvozdenac-Urošević, B., Comprehensive analysis of a straw-fired power plant in Vojvodina, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), pp. 97-106, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI120205064U.
  13. Repic, B.S., et al., Soya straw bales combustion in high-efficient boiler, Thermal Science, 12 (2008), 4, pp. 51-60, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI0804051R.
  14. Mladenović, M.R., et al., The combustion of biomass - the impact of its types and combustion technologies on the emission of nitrogen oxide, Hemijska Industrija, 70 (2016), 3, pp. 287-298, doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND150409033M
  15. Mladenović, R., et al., The boiler concept for combustion of large soya straw bales, Energy, 34 (2009), 5, pp. 715-723, doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.02.003.
  16. Erić, A.M., et al., Experimental and numerical study on combustion of baled biomass in cigar burners and effects of flue gas re-circulation, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), pp. S151-S165, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI150827207E.
  17. Eriksson, A.C., et al., Particulate PAH emissions from residential biomass combustion: time-resolved analysis with aerosol mass spectrometry, Environmental Science and Technology, 48 (2014), 12, pp. 7143-7150, doi.org/10.1021/es500486j.
  18. Samburova, V., et al., Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biomass-burning emissions and their contribution to light absorption and aerosol toxicity, Science of The Total Environment, 568 (2016), pp. 391-401, doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.026.
  19. Bragato, M., et al., Combustion of coal, bagasse and blends thereof: Part II: Speciation of PAH emissions, Fuel, 96 (2012), pp. 51-58, doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.069.
  20. Verma, S.K., et al., Investigations on PAHs and trace elements in coal and its combustion residues from a power plant, Fuel, 162 (2015), pp. 138-147, doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.005.
  21. Mastral, A.M., Callén, M.S., A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from energy generation, Environmental Science and Technology, 34 (2000), 15, pp. 3051-3057, doi.org/10.1021/es001028d.
  22. Mastral, A., et al., Influence on PAH emissions of the air flow in AFB coal combustion, Fuel, 78 (1999), pp. 1553-1557, doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00079-4.
  23. Stout, S.A., Emsbo-Mattingly, S.D., Concentration and character of PAHs and other hydrocarbons in coals of varying rank - Implications for environmental studies of soils and sediments containing particulate coal, Organic Geochemistry, 39 (2008), 7, pp. 801-819, doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.04.017.
  24. Sadiku, N., et al., Analysis of the calorific and fuel value index of bamboo as a source of renewable biomass feedstock for energy generation in Nigeria, Lignocellulose, 5 (2016), 1, pp. 34-49, pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a908/26807733011ea327c70ba76736a6d8b5d3ce.pdf?_ga=2.59586990.2050072181.1597290679-1070517801.1531232607.
  25. Yang, B., et al., Risk assessment and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils of Huanghuai plain, China, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 84 (2012), pp. 304-310, doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.07.027.
  26. Mubeen, I., et al., Urban contamination assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons released from an oil refinery in Rawalpindi, Thermal Science, 26 (2022), 1, pp. 401-410, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200402055M.
  27. Tobiszewski, M., Namieśnik, J., PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources, Environmental Pollution, 162 (2012), pp. 110-119, doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.10.025.
  28. IARC, IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans; Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds, Part I, Chemical, Environmental and Experimental Data, IARC Working Group, Lyon, France, 1983.
  29. Ribeiro, J., et al., Fly ash from coal combustion - an environmental source of organic compounds, Applied Geochemistry, 44 (2014), pp. 103-110, doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.06.014.
  30. Křůmal, K., et al., Comparison of emissions of gaseous and particulate pollutants from the combustion of biomass and coal in modern and old-type boilers used for residential heating in the Czech Republic, Central Europe, Chemosphere, 229 (2019), pp. 51-59, doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.137.
  31. Wielgosiński, G., et al., Emission of some pollutants from biomass combustion in comparison to hard coal combustion, Journal of the Energy Institute, 90 (2017), 5, pp. 787-796, doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.06.005.
  32. Hsu, W.T., et al., PAH emissions from coal combustion and waste incineration, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 318 (2016), pp. 32-40, doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.038.
  33. Leskinen, J., et al., Fine particle emissions in three different combustion conditions of a wood chip-fired appliance - particulate physico-chemical properties and induced cell death, Atmospheric Environment, 86 (2014), pp. 129-139, doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.012.
  34. ISO 1953:2015 Hard Coals - Size Analysis, 1994, International Organization for Standardization, www.iso.org/standard/63664.html.
  35. ISO 1822:2015, Solid biofuels - Determination of ash content, 2015, International Organization for Standardization, www.iso.org/standard/61515.html.
  36. ISO 18134-1:2015, Solid biofuels - Determination of moisture content - Oven dry method - Total moisture - Reference method, 2015, International Organization for Standardization www.iso.org/standard/61538.html.
  37. ISO 16948: 2015 Solid biofuels - Determination of total content of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen, 2015, International Organization for Standardization, www.iso.org/standard/58004.html.
  38. ASTM D3176-09, Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and Coke, 2009, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org/d3176-09.html.
  39. Bignal, K.L., et al., Release of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter from biomass combustion in a wood-fired boiler under varying boiler conditions, Atmospheric Environment, 42 (2008), 39, pp. 8863-8871, doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.013.
  40. Scurlock, J.M.O., et al., Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource?, Biomass and Bioenergy, 19 (2000), 4, pp. 229-244, doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00038-6.
  41. Thy, P., et al., High temperature elemental losses and mineralogical changes in common biomass ashes, Fuel, 85 (2006), 5-6, pp. 783-795, doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.020.
  42. Werther, J., et al., Combustion of agricultural residues, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26 (2000), 1, pp. 1-27, doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00005-2.
  43. Miles, T.R., et al., Alkali deposits found in biomass power plants. A preliminary investigation of their extent and nature. Report No. NREL/ TZ-2-11226-1; TP-433-8142, Report of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA, 1995.
  44. Demirbaş, A., Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30 (2004), 2, pp. 219-230, doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004.
  45. Dong, J., et al., PAHs emission from the pyrolysis of Western Chinese coal, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 104 (2013), pp. 502-507, doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.05.020.
  46. Vassilev, S.V., et al., An overview of the chemical composition of biomass, Fuel, 89 (2010), 5, pp. 913-933, doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022.
  47. Zhou, C., et al., Co-combustion of bituminous coal and biomass fuel blends: thermochemical characterization, potential utilization and environmental advantage, Bioresource Technology, 218 (2016), pp. 418-427, doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.134.
  48. Rajamma, R., et al., Characterisation and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172 (2009), 2-3, pp. 1049-1060, doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.109.
  49. Karlfeldt Fedje, K., et al., Removal of hazardous metals from MSW fly ash—an evaluation of ash leaching methods, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173 (2010), 1-3, pp. 310-317, doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.094.
  50. Mushtaq, F., et al., Possible applications of coal fly ash in wastewater treatment, Journal of Environmental Management, 240 (2019), pp. 27-46, doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.054.
  51. Saez, F., et al., Cascade impactor sampling to measure polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from biomass combustion processes, Biosystems Engineering, 86 (2003), 1, pp. 103-111, doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00094-1.
  52. Masto, R.E., et al., PAHs and potentially toxic elements in the fly ash and bed ash of biomass fired power plants, Fuel Processing Technology, 132 (2015), pp. 139-152, doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.036.
  53. Zhao, Z.-B., et al., Soluble polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in raw coals, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 73 (2000), 1, pp. 77-85, doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00178-8.
  54. Zhang, J., et al., Predication of the sources of particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in China with distinctive characteristics based on multivariate analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 185 (2018), pp. 841-851, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.091.
  55. Lu, H., et al., Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission from straw burning and the influence of combustion parameters, Atmospheric Environment, 43 (2009), 4, pp. 978-983, doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.022.
  56. Sanchis, E., et al., Gaseous and particulate emission profiles during controlled rice straw burning, Atmospheric Environment, 98 (2014), pp. 25-31, doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.062.
  57. Atkins, A., et al., Profiles of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls from the combustion of biomass pellets, Chemosphere, 78 (2010), 11, pp. 1385-1392, doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.065.
  58. Iordanidis, A., et al., Fly ash-airborne particles from Ptolemais-Kozani area, northern Greece, as determined by ESEM-EDX, International Journal of Coal Geology, 73 (2008), 1, pp. 63-73, doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2007.02.007.
  59. Wang, F., et al., Study on the distribution pattern of PAHs in the coking dust from the coking environment, Procedia Engineering, 45 (2012), pp. 959-961, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.265.
  60. US EPA, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emissions Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources, Chapter 1: External Combustion Sources,1.6 Wood Residue Combustion in Boilers, Report No. AP- 42 Fifth Edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, USA, 2003.
  61. Haglund, N., Guideline for classification of ash from solid biofuels and peat utilised for recycling and fertilizing in forestry and agriculture, Report No. NT TR 613, Nordic Innovation Centre, Oslo, Norway, 2008.
  62. Košnář, Z., et al., Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in biomass fly ash by co-composting and co-vermicomposting, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 369 (2019), pp. 79-86, doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.037.
  63. Samburova, V., et al., Do 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons represent PAH air toxicity?, Toxics, 5 (2017), 3, pp. 1-16, doi.org/10.3390/toxics5030017.
  64. US EPA, Provisional Guidance for Quantitative Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Report No. EPA/ 600/R-93/089, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1993.
  65. Nisbet, I.C., LaGoy, P.K., Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 16 (1992), 3, pp. 290-300, doi.org/10.1016/0273-2300(92)90009-X.
  66. CCME, Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for Carcinogenic and Other Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Environmental and Human Health Effects). Scientific Criteria Document (revised). Report No. 1445, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada 2010.