THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

REMOVAL PATTERN OF PARTICULATE MATTER FROM CONDENSING HEAT EXCHANGER AFTER WET DESULFURIZATION OF COAL-FIRED UNIT

ABSTRACT
The flue gas after wet desulfurization of coal-fired units still contains a large amount of particulate matter. Flue gas condensing heat exchangers are often used to further remove particulate matter. However, current research focuses on the overall removal effect of the heat exchangers, but ignores the difference of pollutant removal ability of the inner tube bundle along the flue gas-flow direction. This paper studied the correlation between pollutant removal and operating parameters of condensation heat exchanger, so as to make the removed amount of pollutants as large as possible. A field experimental platform was built on a 3 × 350 MW supercritical circulating fluidized bed coal-fired unit. The total amount of pollutants removed between the 3rd and 6th rows of tube bundles from the inlet of the heat exchanger was the largest. The removal of particulate matter near the outlet of the heat exchanger was the smallest. The highest removal rate of filterable particulate matter reached 76 %. The proportion of condensable particulate matter in the total removal of particulate matter reached around 90%. The mass ratio of both H2SO4 and SO3 to the removed condensable particulate matter were more than 9 %.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2023-04-22
PAPER REVISED: 2023-05-25
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2023-06-12
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2023-07-16
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI230422151D
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2024, VOLUME 28, ISSUE Issue 1, PAGES [489 - 498]
REFERENCES
  1. Xu, Y., et al., Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 3. Direct Comparison on the PM Removal Efficiency of Electrostatic Precipitators and Fabric Filters, Energy & Fuels, 30 (2016), 7, pp. 5930-5936
  2. Goodarzi, F., Sanei, H., Plerosphere and Its Role in Reduction of Emitted Fine Fly Ash Particles from Pulverized Coal-Fired Power Plants, Fuel, 88 (2009), 2, pp. 382-386
  3. Zhao, S., et al., Migration Behavior of Trace Elements at a Coal-Fired Power Plant with Different Boiler Loads, Energy & Fuels, 31 (2016), 1, pp. 747-754
  4. Hu, Z., et al., Emission Characteristics of Particulate Matters from a 30 MW Biomass-Fired Power Plant in China, Renewable Energy, 155 (2020), Aug., pp. 225-236
  5. Zhao, Y., et al., Establishment of a Database of Emission Factors for Atmospheric Pollutants from Chinese Coal-Fired Power Plants, Atmospheric Environment, 44 (2010), 12, pp. 1515-1523
  6. Kong, S., et al., Emission and Profile Characteristic of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in PM2.5 and PM10 from Stationary Sources Based on Dilution Sampling, Atm. Envir., 77 (2013), Oct., pp. 155-165
  7. Wang, X., et al., Experimental and Kinetics Study on SO3 Catalytic Formation by Fe2O3 in Oxy-Combustion, J. Environ Manage, 236 (2019), Apr., pp. 420-427
  8. Goodarzi, F., The Rates of Emissions of Fine Particles from Some Canadian Coal-Fired Power Plants, Fuel, 85 (2006), 4, pp. 425-433
  9. Nielsen, M. T., et al., Formation and Emission of Fine Particles from Two Coal-Fired Power Plants, Combustion Science and Technology, 174 (2002), 2, pp. 79-113
  10. Kazagic, A., et al., Selection of Sustainable Technologies for Combustion of Bosnian Coals, Thermal Science, 14 (2010), 3, pp. 715-727
  11. Lu, J., Ren, X., Analysis and Discussion on Formation and Control of Primary Particulate Matter Generated from Coal-Fired Power Plants, J. Air Waste Manag Assoc, 64 (2014), 12, pp. 1342-51
  12. Eric, M., et al., Results of the Modernization of the Electrostatic Precipitator at Unit B1 of the Thermal Power Plant Kostolac B, Thermal Science, 22 (2018), Suppl. 5, pp. S1623-S1634
  13. Yao, S., et al., Effect of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD) on Fine Particle (PM2.5) Emission from Coal-Fired Boilers, J. Environ Sci (China), 77 (2019), Mar., pp. 32-42
  14. Liu, X., et al., Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 1. Case Study for a 1000 MW Ultra supercritical Utility Boiler, Energy & Fuels, 30 (2016), 8, pp. 6547-6554
  15. Ruan, R., et al., Effects of APCDs on PM Emission: A Case Study of a 660 MW Coal-Fired Unit with Ultralow Pollutants Emission, Applied Thermal Engineering, 155 (2019), June, pp. 418-427
  16. Chen, D., et al., Experimental Investigation of Aerodynamic Agglomeration of Fine Ash Particles from a 330 MW PC-Fired Boiler, Fuel, 165 (2016), Feb., pp. 86-93
  17. Liu, H., et al., Experimental Investigation on a Novel Agglomeration Device Based on Charged Ultrasonic Spray and Vortex Generators for Improving the Removal of Fine Particles, Fuel, 287 (2021), 119549
  18. Lei, Z., et al., Improving the Removal of Fine Particles by Chemical Agglomeration During the Lime-stone-Gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Process, J. of Env. Science, 80 (2019), June, pp. 37-46
  19. Yang, F., et al., Effects of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization and Wet Electrostatic Precipitator on Particulate Matter and Sulfur Oxide Emission in Coal-Fired Power Plants, Energy & Fuels, 34 (2020), 12, pp. 16423-16432
  20. Wang, K., et al., Characteristics of Condensable Particulate Matter Before and After Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization and Wet Electrostatic Precipitator from Ultra-Low Emission Coal-Fired Power Plants in China, Fuel, 278 (2020), 118206
  21. Cao, R., et al., Condensational Growth Activated by Cooling Method for Multi-Objective Treatment of Desulfurized Flue Gas: A Full-Scale Study, Chemical Engineering Journal, 410 (2021), 128296
  22. Wang, W., et al., A Simple Moment Model to Study the Effect of Diffusion on the Coagulation of Nanoparticles Due to Brownian Motion in the Free Molecule Regime, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), 5, pp. 1331-1338
  23. Chen, Z., et al., The Synergetic Particles Collection in Three Different Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Towers: A Pilot-Scale Experimental Investigation, Fuel Pro. Tech., 179 (2018), Oct., pp. 344-350
  24. Darbandi, T., et al., CFD Modeling of the Forces in the Wet Scrubber Acting on Particulate Matter Released from Biomass Combustion, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 25 (2021), 100997
  25. Yang, Z., et al., Challenge of SO3 Removal by Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Under Simulated Flue Gas with High SO3 Concentration, Fuel, 217 (2018), Apr., pp. 597-604
  26. Zheng, C., et al., Formation, Transformation, Measurement, and Control of SO3 in Coal-Fired Power Plants, Fuel, 241 (2019), Apr., pp. 327-346
  27. Yang, Z., et al., A Combined Wet Electrostatic Precipitator for Efficiently Eliminating Fine Particle Penetration, Fuel Processing Technology, 180 (2018), Nov., pp. 122-129
  28. Kim, H. J., et al., Fine Particle Removal Performance of a Two-Stage Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Using a Nonmetallic Pre-Charger, J. Air Waste Manag Assoc, 61 (2011), 12, pp. 1334-43
  29. Anderlohr, C., et al., Collection and Generation of Sulfuric Acid Aerosols in a Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, Aerosol Science and Technology, 49 (2015), 3, pp. 144-151
  30. Tan, H., et al., Development of Wet Phase Transition Agglomerator for Multi-Pollutant Synergistic Removal, Applied Thermal Engineering, 130 (2018), Feb., pp. 1208-1214
  31. Cheng, T., et al., Emission Characteristics of Soluble Ions in Fine Particulates in Limestone-Gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System, Energy & Fuels, 34 (2020), 3, pp. 3836-3842
  32. Preining, O., et al., Heterogeneous Nucleation and Droplet Growth, Uni. of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 1981

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence