THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

FINAL METHOD FOR SELECTION OF THE OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOR DEEP ENERGY RENOVATION OF A BUILDING

ABSTRACT
The great potential for reduction of CO2 emissions lies in the deep energy renovation of buildings that exploits the full potential of improving energy efficiency in buildings to maximize energy savings and minimize energy costs. However, in addition to the technical parameters, it is necessary to analyze the willingness of the client to pay for deep energy renovation. This paper presents a methodology applicable to all types of buildings that in a relatively short time provides an optimal solution that meets both parameters – technical and economic, while satisfying the legal requirements. The method was tested by simultaneous use of DESIGNBUILDER software package (which uses ENERGYPLUS as its dynamic simulation engine), PYTHON and SQL programming languages on an office building in the city of Zagreb, where a total of 720 combinations of building deep energy renovation were analyzed. In the analyzed case, it was proved that the application of this methodology results in obtaining the output values 20.51 times faster than the classical input of all combinations of deep energy renovation of the building in software tools. In addition, the probability of human error is much lower by applying this methodology given large amount of input data.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2023-04-10
PAPER REVISED: 2023-05-12
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2023-05-20
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2023-07-16
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI230410155J
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2023, VOLUME 27, ISSUE Issue 6, PAGES [4431 - 4445]
REFERENCES
  1. Economidou, M., et al., (2020). Review of 50 years of EU Energy Efficiency Policies for Buildings, Energy and Buildings, 225 (2020), Oct., 110322
  2. ***, European Parliament, Directive 2002/91/EC on the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD). Off J. Europ Union, 2002
  3. ***, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Energy Performance of Buildings (recast), Published 15.12.2021.
  4. Zhang, L., et al., Optimization Analysis of Thermal Insulation Layer Attributes of Building Envelope Exterior Wall Based on DeST and Life Cycle Economic Evaluation, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 14 (2019), Sept., 100410
  5. Gulotta, T. M., A Bottom-up Harmonized Energy-Environmental Models for Europe (BOHEEME): A Case Study on the Thermal Insulation of the EU-28 Building Stock, Energy and Buildings, 231 (2021), Jan., 110584
  6. Akram, M. W., et al., Global Technological Advancement and Challenges of Glazed Window, Facade System and Vertical Greenery-Based Energy Savings in Buildings: A Comprehensive Review, Energy and Built Environment, 4 (2023), 2, pp. 206-226
  7. Bac, U., et al., A Comprehensive Evaluation of the most Suitable HVAC System for an Industrial Building by Using a Hybrid Building Energy Simulation and Multi Criteria Decision Making Framework, Journal of Building Engineering, 37 (2021), May, 102153
  8. Shi, H., Chen, Q., Building Energy Management Decision-Making in the Real World: A Comparative Study of HVAC Cooling Strategies, Journal of Building Engineering, 33 (2020), Jan., 101869
  9. Elettra, A., et al., Deep Energy Renovation Strategies: A Real Option Approach for Add-Ons in a Social Housing Case Study, Energy and Buildings, 161 (2018), Feb., pp. 1-9
  10. Jradi, M., et al., Deep Energy Renovation of the Mærsk Office Building in Denmark Using a Holistic Design Approach, Energy and Buildings, 151 (2017), Sept., pp. 306-319
  11. Tettey, U. Y. A., et al., Energy Savings and Overheating Risk of Deep Energy Renovation of a Multi- Storey Residential Building in a Cold Climate Under Climate Change, Energy, 202 (2020), July, 117578
  12. Dodoo, A., et al., Final Energy Savings and Cost-Effectiveness of Deep Energy Renovation of a Multi- Storey Residential Building, Energy, 135 (2017), Sept., pp. 563-576
  13. Cholewa, T., et al., On Calculated and Actual Energy Savings from Thermal Building Renovations - Long Term Field Evaluation of Multifamily Buildings, Energy and Buildings, 223 (2020), Sept., 110145
  14. Economidou, M, et al., Europe's Buildings under the Microscope. A Country-by-Country Review of the Energy Performance of Buildings, Build Perform. Inst. Eur. (BPIE), Brussels, Belgian, 2011
  15. ***, IEA OECD Report, Transition to Sustainable Buildings. Strategies and Opportunities to 2050 OECD/IEA July 2013 (612013151P1), ISBN:978-92-64-20841-2
  16. Osterbring, M., et al., Prioritizing Deep Renovation for Housing Portfolios, Energy and Buildings, 202 (2019), Nov., 109361
  17. Semprini, G., et al., Deep Regeneration vs. Shallow Renovation to Achieve Nearly Zero Energy in Existing Buildings., Energy and Buildings, 156 (2017), Dec., pp. 327-342
  18. Osterbring, M., et al., Stakeholder Specific Multi-Scale Spatial Representation of Urban Building- Stocks, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7 (2018), 5, 173
  19. Sim, M., Suh, D., A Heuristic Solution and Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Solar PV/GSHP System: A Case Study of Campus Residential Building in Korea, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47 (2021), Oct., 101490
  20. Crawley, D. B., et al., EnergyPlus, a New-Generation Building Energy Simulation Program
  21. Klein, S A., et al., TRNSYS 17: A Transient System Simulation Program
  22. ***, Modelica® - A Unified Object-Oriented Language for Systems Modeling, Language Specification, Version 3.4
  23. ***, Technical Regulation on Rational Use of Energy and Thermal Protection in Buildings (OG 128/15, 70/18, 73/18, 86/18, 102/20)
  24. ***, Design Builder, 2015: www.designbuilder.co.uk
  25. Eskin, N., Turkmen, H., Analysis of Annual Heating and Cooling Energy Requirements for Office Buildings in Different Climates in Turkey, Energy and Buildings, 40 (2008), 5, pp. 763-773
  26. ***, Help v.06: designbuilder.co.uk/helpv6.0/#_Heating_design_simulation.htm
  27. ***, EnergyPlus™ Version 8.9.0 Documentation, Engineering Reference, U.S. Department of Energy,March 23, 2018.
  28. ***, EnergyPlus Testing with ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2001 (BESTEST), EnergyPlus Version 1.2.0.029, June 2004
  29. Slavković, B. P., Application of the Double Skin Facade in Rehabilitation of the Industrial Buildings in Serbia, Thermal Science, 21 (2017), 21, 6B, pp. 2945-2955
  30. Fathalian, A., Kargarsharifabad, H., Actual Validation of Energy Simulation and Investigation of Energy Management Strategies (Case Study: An Office Building in Semnan, Iran). Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 12 (2018), pp. 510-516
  31. Millman, K. J., Aivazis, M., Python for Scientists and Engineers, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13 (2011), 2, pp. 9-12

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence