THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A MICROCOGENERATION SYSTEM USING THE THEORY OF EXERGETIC COST

ABSTRACT
Cogeneration and trigeneration systems have been broadly employed as part of the strategies oriented toward rational energy use. The assessment of these systems must include simultaneous considerations of costs, irreversibility, energy losses, and their causes. This work presents a step-by-step thermoeconomic analysis of a microcogeneration unit, composed of an internal combustion engine and an NH3-water single-effect absorption refrigeration chiller. The research employed the Theory of Exergetic Cost method to determine monetary and energy costs and the exergy efficiency of equipment. It is therefore, possible to identify which pieces of equipment present the highest impact and focus on these to improve the overall performance of the energy system. Although not part of the Theory of Exergetic cost, exergoeconomic parameters can be calculated to expand the assessment further. The highest specific exergy cost is associated with the endothermic reaction inside the absorber (282 $/GJ), while the lowest specific exergy cost is due to electricity consumed by the pump of the refrigeration system (2.16 $/GJ). The highest exergy efficiency was identified at the condenser (almost 90%, while values under 40% were obtained for the engine, pump, and absorber. The combined analysis of exergoeconomic results indicates that the lowest performances are related to the generator, the absorber, the evaporator, and the regenerator.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2022-08-06
PAPER REVISED: 2022-10-22
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2022-12-05
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2023-02-11
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI220806023M
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2023, VOLUME 27, ISSUE Issue 5, PAGES [3579 - 3589]
REFERENCES
  1. Melo, F. M., et al.. Optimization and Sensitivity Analyses of a Combined Cooling, Heat and Power System for a Residential Building, Thermal Science, 25 (2021), 5B, pp. 3969-3986
  2. Yucer, C. T., Hepbasli, A., Improving the Performance of a Heating System through Energy Management by Using Exergy Parameters, Thermal Science, 24 (2020), 6A, pp.3771-3780
  3. Lozano, M. A., Valero, A, Theory of the Exergetic Cost, Energy, 18 (1993), 9, pp. 939-960
  4. Valero, A., et al., On-Line Monitoring of Power-Plant Performance Using Exergetic Cost Techniques, Applied Thermal Engineering, 16 (1996), 12, pp. 933-948
  5. Ochoa, A. A., et al., Techno-Economic and Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Microcogeneration System for a Residential Use, Acta Sci Technol, 38 (2016), 3, pp. 327-338
  6. Uysal, C., A New Approach to Advanced Exergoeconomic Analysis: The Unit Cost of Entropy Generation, Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 39 (2020), 1, pp. 1-15
  7. Yilmaz, C., Thermoeconomic Cost Analysis and Comparison of Methodologies for Dora II Binary Geothermal Power Plant, Geothermics, 75 (2018), Sept., pp. 48-57
  8. Haydargil, D., Abusoglu A., A Comparative Thermoeconomic Cost Accounting Analysis and Evaluation of Biogas Engine-powered Cogeneration, Energy, 159 (2018), Sept., pp. 97-114
  9. Yu, M., et al., Advanced Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis of Cascade Absorption Refrigeration System Driven by Low-Grade Waste Heat, A C S Sustainable Chem. Eng., 7 (2019), 19, pp. 16843-16857
  10. Yildiz, A., Thermoeconomic Analysis of Diffusion Absorption Refrigeration Systems, Applied Thermal Engineering, 99 (2016), Apr., pp. 23-31
  11. Misra, R. D., et al., Application of the Exergetic Cost Theory to the LiBr/H2O Vapour Absorption System, Energy, 27 (2002), 11, pp.1009-1025
  12. Rangel-Hernandez, V. H., et al., The Exergy Costs of Electrical Power, Cooling, and Waste Heat from a Hybrid System Based on a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and an Absorption Refrigeration System, Energies, 12 (2019), 18, 3476
  13. Yang, K., et al., Thermoeconomic Analysis of an Integrated Combined Cooling Heating and Power System with Biomass Gasification, Energy Convers and Manag, 171 (2018), Sept., pp. 671-682
  14. Valero, A., et al., Theory of Exergy Cost and Thermo-Ecological Cost, Thermodyn Sustain Manag Nat Resour, 01 (2017), May, pp. 167-202
  15. Torres, C., Valero, A., The Exergy Cost Theory Revisited, Energies, 14 (2021), 6, 1594
  16. Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G., The SPECO: A Systematic and General Methodology for Calculating Efficiencies and Costs in Thermal Systems, Energy, 31(2006), 8-9, pp. 1257-1289
  17. Cavalcanti, E. J. C., Motta, H. P., Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Solar-Powered/Fuel Assisted Rankine Cycle for Power Generation, Energy, 88 (2015), Aug., pp. 555-562
  18. Cavalcanti, E. J. C., et al., Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Comparison of Diesel-Biodiesel Blends in a Direct Injection Engine at Variable Loads, Energy Convers Manag, 183 (2019), Mar., pp. 450-461
  19. Santos, R. G., et al., Thermoeconomic Modelling for CO2 Allocation in Steam and Gas Turbine Cogeneration Systems, Energy, 117 (2016), Part 2, pp. 590-603
  20. Aghbashlo, M., Rosen, M. A., Exergoecono Environmental Analysis as a New Concept for Developing Thermodynamically, Economically, and Environmentally Sound Energy Conversion Systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187 (2018), June, pp. 190-204
  21. Trindade, A. B., et al., Comparative Analysis of Different Cost Allocation Methodologies in LCA for Cogeneration Systems, Energy Convers Manag, 241 (2021), 114230
  22. Marques, A. S., et al., Exergoeconomic Assessment of a Compact Electricity-Cooling Cogeneration Unit, Energies, 13 (2020), 20, pp. 1-18
  23. ***, Ford Motor Company. Available at: www.ford.com.br/content/dam/Ford/website-assets/latam/br/servico-ao-cliente/manuais/2010/manuais-do-proprietario/Focus_2010.pdf (in Portuguese), 2022,
  24. ***, RoburCorp. Available at: www.robur.com, 2022
  25. Herold, K. E., et al., Absorption Chillers and Heat Pumps, CRC Press, Boca raton, Fla., USA, 2016
  26. Tsatsaronis, G., Definitions and Nomenclature in Exergy Analysis and Exergoeconomics, Energy, 32 (2007), 4, pp. 249-253
  27. Bejan A., et al.,. Thermal Design and Optimization, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N. J., USA,1996
  28. Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis G., Comparison Between SPECO and Functional Exergoeconomic Approaches, Proceedings, ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. IMECE/AES-23656, New York, USA, 2001, pp. 463-478

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence