THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

THE 3-D OPTIMIZATION OF AN AXIAL MIXER PROPELLER THROUGH HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATIONS

ABSTRACT
Homogeneous mixing is an important process quality indicator in biogas fermenters for introducing fresh organic feed material to certain bacteria groups such as methanogenic bacteria for anaerobic digestion. Energy consumption for mixing processes is one of the highest operational costs in biogas plants. Thus, it is crucial to carefully consider the energy expenditure per generated thrust (the first performance metric of an axial mixer) for a biogas mixer, since biogas plants are considered as a net carbon zero energy plant. There are several different types of mixers. Axial mixers both high speed and low speed together with paddle mixers are most common among various types of mixers used in fermenter tanks. In this study it is planned to improve conventional axial biogas mixer efficiency using computer aided engineering tools for design and optimization. This goal will be achieved by using a parametric design strategy for blade geometry together with the open source CFD analysis suite OpenFOAM for measuring performance metrics (i.e. power, torque, and thrust). The most efficient design will be chosen from a set of design candidates residing inside a reasonably large parametric state space, via maximizing the thrust to power ratio.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2023-01-26
PAPER REVISED: 2023-02-22
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2023-04-24
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2023-09-17
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI2304281K
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2023, VOLUME 27, ISSUE Issue 4, PAGES [3281 - 3289]
REFERENCES
  1. ***, World Energy Outlook 2019, Available online: www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019, (accessed on 15 March 2023)
  2. Ohnmacht, B., et al., Demand-oriented Biogas Production and Biogas Storage in Digestate by Flexibly Feeding a Full-scale Biogas Plant, Bioresource Technology, 332 (2021), July, 125077
  3. Rasi, S., et al., Trace Compounds of Biogas from Different Biogas Production Plants, Energy, 32 (2021), 8, pp. 1375-1380
  4. Chen, Y. R., et al., Rheological Properties of Sieved Beef-Cattle Manure Slurry: Rheological Model and Effects of Temperature and Solids Concentration, Agricultural Wastes, 15 (1986), 1, pp. 17-33
  5. Moeller, G., et al., Rheological Characterisation of Primary and Secondary Sludges Treated by Both Aerobic and Anaerobic Digestion, Bioresource Technology, 61 (1997), 3, pp. 207-211
  6. Naegele, H.-J, et al., Electric Energy Consumption of the Full-Scale Research Biogas Plant "Unterer Lindenhof": Results of Longterm and Full Detail Mesaruments, Energies, 5 (2012), 12, pp. 5198-5214
  7. Lemmer, A., et al., How Efficient are Agitators in Biogas Digesters? Determination of the Efficiency of Submersible Motor Mixers and Incline Agitators by Measuring Nutrient Distribution in Full-Scale Agricultural Biogas Digesters, Energies, 6 (2013), 12, pp. 6255-6273
  8. Reviol, T., et al., Investigation of Propeller Mixer for Agitation of Non-Newtonian Fluid Flow to Predict the Characteristics Within the Design Process, Chemical Engineering Science, 191 (2018), Dec., pp. 420-435
  9. Błonski, D., et al., Numerical Simulation and Experimental Investigation of Submersible Sewage Mixer Performance, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1741 (2021), Sept., pp. 1-11
  10. Karim, K., et al., Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Waste: Effect of Mode of Mixing, Bioresource Technology, 96 (2005), 15, pp. 1607-1612
  11. Kress, P., et al., Effect of Agitation Time on Nutrient Distribution in Full-scale CSTR Biogas Digesters, Bioresource Technology, 247 (2018), Jan., pp. 1-6
  12. Zlokarnik, M., Rührtechnik: Theorie und Praxis, Springer, Berlin, 1999
  13. Kraume, M., Mischen und Rühren: Grundlagen und moderne Verfahren, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003
  14. Reviol, T., et al., A New Design Method for Propeller Mixers Agitating Non-Newtonian Fluid Flow, Chemical Engineering Science, 190 (2018), Nov., pp. 320-332
  15. Stel, H., et al., Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Multistage Electric Submersible Pump, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 136 (2015), Dec., pp. 41-54
  16. Li, W., et al., Numerical Simulation and Performance Analysis of a Four-stage Centrifugal Pump, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8 (2016), 10, pp. 1-8
  17. Golcu, M., et al., Energy Saving in a Deep Well Pump with Splitter Blade, Energy Conversion and Management, 47 (2006), 5, pp. 638-651
  18. Zhou, L., et al., Performance Optimization in a Centrifugal Pump Impeller by Orthogonal Experiment and Numerical Simulation, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 5 (2013), Jan., pp. 1-7
  19. Berten, S., et al., Rotor-Stator Interaction Induced Pressure Fluctuations: CFD and Hydroacoustic Simulations in the Stationary Components of a Multistage Centrifugal Pump, Proceedings, ASME/JSME 2007 5th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Dijego, Cal., USA, 2007, pp. 963-970
  20. Zhou, L., et al., Numerical Investigations and Performance Experiments of a Deep-well Centrifugal Pump with Different Diffusers, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 134 (2012), 7, pp. 1-8
  21. ***, OpenFOAM Users Guide v10, openfoam.org

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence