THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links

Suleyman Simsek

,

Funda Dogan

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF WIND POWER PLANTS FROM RENEWABLE ENERGY TYPES TO REDUCE ATMOSPHERE POLLUTION IN MARMARA REGION

ABSTRACT
Our need for energy is increasing every day with the advancement of technology. Energy plays a major role in the social and economic sphere of life. The need for RES is increasing day by day although the need for energy is produced from fossil fuels in many countries. In addition to this, while the harmful gases emitted to the environment as a result of using fossil fuel for energy production harm the nature, this is not possible in renewable wind energy. Renewable wind energy is an endless source of energy obtained from natural processes. Therefore, wind power stations get attention of many countries. The wind industry is the world's fastest-growing energy source. However, the main problem of the renewable wind energy sector is that the desired wind intensity cannot be sustained at the same rate and the installation costs are high. Many countries are aware of the importance of wind energy and make certain investments in renewable wind energy in the long term. Wind turbines can be in different shapes according to their location and intended use. One of the most important reasons for their different designs is the wind types in their geographies. In this study, wind power plants in five different regions in Marmara region were discussed. These plants were com-pared among themselves, the results were evaluated and the efficiency of the plants compared.
KEYWORDS
alternative energy, wind energy, wind turbine, renewable energy
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2022-12-19
PAPER REVISED: 2023-03-28
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2023-04-30
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2023-09-17
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI2304171S
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2023, VOLUME 27, ISSUE Issue 4, PAGES [3171 - 3177]
REFERENCES
  1. Simsek, S., B. Ozdalyan, Improvements to the Composition of Fusel Oil and Analysis of the Effects of Fusel Oil-Gasoline Blends on a Spark-Ignited (SI) Engine's Performance and Emissions, Energies, 11 (2018), 3, p. 625
  2. Simsek, S., et al., Improvement of the Properties of Sugar Factory Fusel Oil Waste and Investigation of its Effect on the Performance and Emissions of Spark Ignition Engine, BioResources, 14 (2019), 1, p. 440-452
  3. Dehghani-Sanij, A. R., et al., A New Design of Wind Tower for Passive Ventilation in Buildings to Reduce Energy Consumption in Windy Regions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42 (2015), Feb., pp. 182-195
  4. Roh, H., et al., Ultrathin Unified Harvesting Module Capable of Generating Electrical Energy during Rainy, Windy, and Sunny Conditions, Nano Energy, 70 (2020), Apr., p. 104515
  5. Longwell, J. P., et al., Coal: Energy for the Future, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 21 (1995), 4. pp. 269-360
  6. Simsek, S., et al., Experimental Study on the Ability of Different Biogas Level Dual Fuel Spark Ignition Engine: Emission Mitigation, Performance, and Combustion Analysis, Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue d'IFP Energies nouvelles 76 (2021), Dec., p. 74
  7. Wang, Q., Effective Policies for Renewable Energy - the Example of China's Wind Power - Lessons for China's Photovoltaic Power, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 14 (2010), 2, pp. 702-712
  8. Kabalci, E., Design and Analysis of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Plant with Solar and Wind Power, Energy Conversion and Management, 72 (2013), Aug., pp. 51-59
  9. Lund, H., Renewable Energy Strategies for Sustainable Development, Energy, 32 (2007), 6, pp. 912-919
  10. Nelson, V., K. Starcher, Wind Energy: Renewable Energy and the Environment, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., USA, 2018
  11. Amjith, L., B. Bavanish, A Review on Biomass and Wind as Renewable Energy for Sustainable Environment, Chemosphere, 293 (2022), Apr., p. 133579
  12. Moriarty, P., D. Honnery, Can Renewable Energy Power the Future? Energy policy, 93 (2016), June, pp 3-7
  13. Podesta, J., et al., Spectral Exponents of Kinetic and Magnetic Energy Spectra in Solar Wind Turbulence, The Astrophysical Journal, 664 (2007), 1, p. 543
  14. Kang, X., et al., Flexible Wearable Hybrid Nanogenerator to Harvest Solar Energy and Human Kinetic Energy, Nano Energy, 103 (2022), Part A, Dec., p. 107808
  15. Greenblatt, J. B., et al., Baseload Wind Energy: Modeling the Competition between Gas Turbines and Compressed Air Energy Storage for Supplemental Generation, Energy policy, 35 (2007), 3, pp. 1474-1492
  16. Bullough, C., et al., Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage for the Integration of Wind Energy, Proceedings, European wind energy conference, EWEC, 2004, Citeseer
  17. Hasan, N. S., et al., Review of Storage Schemes for Wind Energy Systems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21 (2013), May, pp. 237-247
  18. Broecker, H.-C., et al., The Influence of Wind on CO2-Exchange in a Wind-Wave Tunnel, Including the Effects of Monolayers, Journal of Marine Research 36 (1978), 4, p. 1445
  19. Lenzen, M., J. Munksgaard, Energy and CO2 Life-Cycle Analyses of Wind Turbines - Review and Applications, Renewable energy, 26 (2002), 3, pp. 339-362
  20. Dale, M., A Comparative Analysis of Energy Costs of Photovoltaic, Solar Thermal, and Wind Electricity Generation Technologies, Applied sciences, 3 (2013), 2, pp. 325-337
  21. Ajayi, O. O., et al., Wind Energy Study and Energy Cost of Wind Electricity Generation in Nigeria: Past and Recent Results and a Case Study for South West Nigeria, Energies, 7 (2014), 12, pp. 8508-8534
  22. Ajayi, O., et al., Assessment of Wind Power Potential and Wind Electricity Generation Using WECS of Two Sites in South West, Nigeria, International Journal of Energy Science, 1 (2011), 2, pp. 78-92
  23. Ilkilic, C., Wind Energy and Assessment of Wind Energy Potential in Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2012), 2, pp. 1165-1173
  24. Kose, R., et al., The Analysis of Wind Data and Wind Energy Potential in Kutahya, Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8 (2004), 3, pp. 277-288
  25. Ucar, A., F. Balo, Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential and Electricity Generation at Six Locations in Turkey, Applied Energy, 86 (2009), 10, pp. 1864-1872
  26. Arslan, H., et al., Wind Speed Variability and Wind Power Potential over Turkey: Case Studies for Çanakkale and İstanbul, Renewable Energy, 145 (2020), Jan., pp. 1020-1032
  27. Eryilmaz, S., Y. Devrim, Theoretical Derivation of Wind Plant Power Distribution with the Consideration of Wind Turbine Reliability, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185 (2019), May, pp. 192-197
  28. Petru, T., T. Thiringer, Modeling of Wind Turbines for Power System Studies, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17 (2002), 4, pp. 1132-1139
  29. Chen, Z., et al., A Review of the State of the Art of Power Electronics for Wind Turbines, IEEE Transactions on power electronics, 24 (2009), 8, pp. 1859-1875
  30. Jauch, C., et al., International Comparison of Requirements for Connection of Wind Turbines to Power Systems, Wind Energy, 8 (2005), 3, pp. 295-306
  31. Eriksson, S., et al., Evaluation of Different Turbine Concepts for Wind Power, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12 (2008), 5, pp. 1419-1434
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Comparison of the efficiency of wind power plants from renewable energy types to reduce atmosphere pollution in Marmara region

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence