THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

External Links

DOES AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROMOTE AGRO-ECOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY? EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

ABSTRACT
Given the background of the rural population ageing, the reduced agricultural non-point source pollution and the decreased agricultural carbon emission, agricultural producer services, as an important bridge between small farmers and modern agriculture, are an important path to ensure food security and the green development of agriculture. Based on panel data of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2020, this paper uses Slack-based measure model with undesirable outputs (SBM-undesirable model)to calculate the agricultural ecological efficiency of 31 provinces. Furthermore, the two-stage least squares, the panel threshold model and the spatial Durbin model are used to empirically analyze the influence mechanism and the spatial spillover effect of agricultural productive services on agricultural ecological efficiency. The results show that agricultural producer services have a significant non-linear impact on agricultural ecological efficiency. Rural residents' income and per capita cultivated land area can adjust the relationship between them. The two main ways for agricultural productive services to improve agricultural ecological efficiency are as follows: reducing undesirable outputs such as pesticides, chemical fertilizers and plastic sheeting for agricultural use and improving agricultural production efficiency. In addition, agricultural producer services have a significant positive spatial spillover effect on agricultural ecological efficiency, and the indirect impact elasticity of spatial spillover is higher than the direct impact elasticity. Therefore, to achieve food security and promote the sustainable development of agriculture, it is necessary to vigorously develop agricultural productive ser-vices through multiparty cooperation.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2021-10-10
PAPER REVISED: 2022-06-16
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2022-06-18
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2023-06-11
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI2303109L
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2023, VOLUME 27, ISSUE Issue 3, PAGES [2109 - 2118]
REFERENCES
  1. Ortiz, B. A., et al., Anthropogenic Climate Change Has Slowed Global Agricultural Productivity Growth, Nature Climate Change, 11 (2021), 4, pp. 306-328
  2. Abid, M., et al., Adaptation to Climate Change and its Impacts on Food Productivity and Crop Income: Perspectives of Farmers in Rural Pakistan, Journal of Rural Studies, 47 (2016), Oct., pp. 254-266
  3. Wang, Z. B., et al., Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Chemical Fertilizer Types in China's Crop Production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141 (2017), Jan., pp. 1267-1274
  4. Guo, H. P., et al., Analysis in the Influencing Factors of Climate-Responsive Behaviors of Maize Growers: Evidence from China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (2022), 7, pp. 1-17
  5. Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., How Has Microcredit Supported Agriculture? Evidence Using Panel Data from Bangladesh, Agricultural Economics, 47 (2016), 2, pp. 157-168
  6. Tang, L. Q. , et al., Do Agricultural Services Contribute to Cost Saving? Evidence from Chinese Rice Farmers, China Agricultural Economic Review, 10 (2018), 2, pp. 323-337
  7. Qiao, F. B., The Impact of Agricultural Service on Grain Production in China, Sustainability, 12 (2020), 15, pp. 1-18
  8. Chen, T., et al., Exploring the Role of Agricultural Services in Production Efficiency in Chinese Agriculture: A Case of the Socialized Agricultural Service System, Land, 11 (2022), 3, pp. 1-18
  9. Ehsan, E., et al., Agricultural Advisory and Financial Services; Farm Level Access, Outreach and Impact in a Mixed Cropping District of Punjab Pakistan, Land Use Policy, 71 (2018), Feb., pp. 249-260
  10. Akbar, U., et al., Nexus between Agro-Ecological Efficiency and Carbon Emission Transfer: Evidence from China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (2021), June, pp. 18995-19007
  11. Ji, T. G., et al., Marginal Trade-Offs for Improved Agro-Ecological Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Agronomy-Basel, 11 (2021), 2, pp. 1-29
  12. Xiao, J. Y., et al., Explaining Peasants' Intention and Behavior of Farmland Trusteeship in China: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Production, Sustainability, 12 (2020), 14, pp. 1-14
  13. Chen, Z., et al., Household Labor Migration and Farmers' Access to Productive Agricultural Services: A Case Study from Chinese Provinces, Agriculture, 11 (2021), 10, pp. 1-20
  14. Chi, M. J., et al., Spatial Distribution of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Agriculture High-Quality Development in China, Land, 11 (2022), 5, pp. 1-15
  15. Wu, G. Y., et al., China's Agricultural Ecological Efficiency and Spatial Spillover Effect, Environment Development and Sustainability, 25 (2022), Mar., pp. 3073-3098
  16. Li, H., et al., Regional Environmental Efficiency Evaluation in China: Analysis Based on the Super-SBM Model with Undesirable Outputs, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58 (2013), 5-6, pp. 1018-1031
  17. Cecchini, L., et al., Environmental Efficiency Analysis and Estimation of CO2 Abatement Costs in Dairy Cattle Farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA Model with Undesirable Output, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197 (2018), 1, pp. 895-907

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence