THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links

Caner Taniş

,

Buğra Saracoglu

COMPARISONS OF SIX DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR LOG-KUMARASWAMY DISTRIBUTION

ABSTRACT
In this paper, it is considered the problem of estimation of unknown parameters of log-Kumaraswamy distribution via Monte Carlo simulations. Firstly, it is described six different estimation methods such as maximum likelihood, approximate bayesian, least-squares, weighted least-squares, percentile and Crámer-von-Mises. Then, it is performed a Monte Carlo simulation study to evaluate the performances of these methods according to the biases and mean-squared errors (MSEs) of the estimators. Furthermore, two real data applications based on carbon fibers and the gauge lengths are presented to compare the fits of log-Kumaraswamy and other fitted statistical distributions.
KEYWORDS
log-Kumaraswamy distribution, Crámer-von-Mises estimation method, Least-squares estimation, Maximum likelihood estimation, Percentile estimation, Monte Carlo simulation
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2019-04-11
PAPER REVISED: 2019-07-25
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2019-08-01
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2019-09-15
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI190411344T
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2019, VOLUME 23, ISSUE Supplement 6, PAGES [S1839 - S1847]
REFERENCES
  1. Lemonte, A. J., et al., The exponentiated Kumaraswamy distribution and its log-transform, Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 27 (2013), 1, pp. 31-53
  2. Kumaraswamy, P., A generalized probability density function for double-bounded random processes. Journal of Hydrology, 46 (1980), 1-2, pp. 79-88
  3. Mohammed, H. F., Inference on the Log-Exponentiated Kumaraswamy Distribution. International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 12 (2017), 4, pp. 165-179
  4. Chacko, M., Mohan, R., Estimation of parameters of Kumaraswamy-exponential distribution under progressive type-II censoring. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87 (2017), 10, pp. 1951-1963
  5. Akinsete, A, et al., The Kumaraswamy-geometric distribution.Journal of Statistical Distributions and applications. (2014), pp.1-17
  6. Jose, K. K., Varghese, J., Wrapped Log Kumaraswamy Distribution and its Applications. International Journal Of Mathematics And Computer Research, 6 (2018), 10, pp. 1924-1930
  7. Korkmaz, M. Ç., Genç, A. İ.., Two-sided generalized exponential distribution. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 44, (2015), 23, pp.5049-5070
  8. Korkmaz, M. Ç., Genc, A. İ. A lifetime distribution based on a transformation of a two-sided power variate. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 14 (2015), 3, pp.265-280.
  9. Ramos, P. L., Louzada, F., The generalized weighted Lindley distribution: Properties, estimation, and applications. Cogent Mathematics, 3 (2016), 1, 1256022.
  10. Dey, S et al., Comparisons of Methods of Estimation for the NH Distribution. Annals of Data Science, 4 (2017), 4, pp. 441-455.
  11. Dey, S., et al., Kumaraswamy distribution: different methods of estimation. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 37 (2018), 2, pp. 2094-2111
  12. Dey, S., et al., Statistical properties and different methods of estimation of Gompertz distribution with application. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 21 (2018), 5, pp. 839-876.
  13. Ramos, P. et al., (2018). The Frechet distribution: Estimation and Application an Overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.05327.
  14. Balakrishnan, N., Kundu, D., Birnbaum‐Saunders distribution: A review of models, analysis, and applications. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 35 (2019), 1, pp.4-49
  15. Tierney, L., Kadane, J. B., Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. Journal of the american statistical association, 81 (1986), 393, pp. 82-86
  16. Danish, M. Y., Aslam, M., Bayesian estimation for randomly censored generalized exponential distribution under asymmetric loss functions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40 (2013), 5, pp. 1106-1119
  17. Gencer, G., Saracoglu, B., Comparison of approximate Bayes Estimators under different loss functions for parameters of Odd Weibull Distribution. Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science, 5 (2016), 1, pp. 18-32
  18. Kumar, K., Classical and Bayesian estimation in log-logistic distribution under random censoring. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9 (2018), 2, pp. 440-451
  19. Kınacı, et al., Kesikli Chen Dağılımı için Bayes Tahmini. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 42 (2016), 2, pp. 144-148
  20. Tanış, C., Saraçoğlu, B.,. Statistical Inference Based on Upper Record Values for the Transmuted Weibull Distribution, International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention, 5 (2017), 9, pp. 19-23
  21. Jung, M., Chung, Y., Bayesian inference of three-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 47 (2018), 17, pp. 4229-4241
  22. Kao JHK., Computer methods for estimatingWeibull parameters in reliability studies. Trans IRE Reliab Qual Control, 13 (1958), pp.15-22
  23. Kao JHK., A graphical estimation of mixed Weibull parameters in life testing electron tubes Technometrics, 1 (1959), pp. 389-407
  24. Gupta R. D., Kundu D., Generalized exponential distribution: different method of estimations. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 69 (2001), pp. 315-338
  25. Alkasabeh MR, Raqab MZ, Estimation of the generalized logistic distribution parameters: comparative study. Statistical Methodology, 6 (2009), 3, pp. 262-279
  26. Erisoglu, U., Erisoglu, M., Percentile Estimators for Two-Component Mixture Distribution Models. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 43 (2019) 2, pp. 601-619
  27. Luceño, A., Fitting the generalized pareto distribution to data using maximum goodness-of-fit estimators. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51 (2006), pp. 904-917
  28. Macdonald, P., An estimation procedure for mixtures of distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 33 (1971), pp.326-329
  29. Bader, M. G., & Priest, A. M., Statistical aspects of fibre and bundle strength in hybrid composites. Progress in science and engineering of composites, (1982), pp.1129-1136.
  30. Kundu, D., Raqab, M. Z., Estimation of R= P (Y< X) for three-parameter Weibull distribution. Statistics & Probability Letters, 79, (2009), 17, pp. 1839-1846
  31. Ghitany, M. E., et al., Power Lindley distribution and associated inference. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 64, (2013), pp. 20-33
  32. Nofal, Z. M., et al., The generalized transmuted-G family of distributions. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 46, (2017), 8, pp. 4119-4136
  33. Nichols, M. D., Padgett, W. J., A bootstrap control chart for Weibull percentiles. Quality and reliability engineering international, 22, (2006), 2, pp. 141-151
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Comparisons of six different estimation methods for log-Kumaraswamy distribution

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence