International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links


Turkey need for electricity increases constantly because of its developing economy. So it applies to incentives to find solution to the problem of scarcity of electricity. Building plants using coal gets the greatest support from the state in Turkey. Electricity production with coal in Turkey increases faster than the other sources due to the incentive policies at place. On the other hand, coal compared with other fossil fuel is also the most abundant and most widely used fossil fuel in the world. According to the International Energy Agency data, building plants using coal is in the lead. In addition, it is foreseen that building plants using coal will be the major way of producing electricity although many other materials started to be used in the production of electricity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incentive policies Turkey has in regards to coal plants and to offer policies.
PAPER REVISED: 2017-01-17
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2017-01-17
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2017, VOLUME 21, ISSUE Issue 5, PAGES [1917 - 1924]
  1. Bhanot, J., Jha, V., Moving towards tangible decision-making tools for policy makers: Measuring and monitoring energy access provision, Energy Policy, 47 (2012), pp. 64-70.
  2. Sharabaroff, A., Boyd, R., Chimeli, A., The environmental and efficiency effects of restructuring on the electric power sector in the United States: An empirical analysis, Energy Policy, 37 (2009), pp. 4884-4893.
  3. Javadi, S. F., Rismanchi, B., Sarraf, M., Afshar, O., Saidur, R., Ping, W. H., Rahim, A. N., Global policy of rural electrification, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19 (2013), pp. 402-416.
  4. Chen, F. F., Chou, C. S., Lu, K. T., Scenario analysis of the new energy policy for Taiwan's electricity sector until 2025, Energy Policy, 61 (2013), pp. 162-171.
  5. Allan, G., Eromenko, I., Gilmartin, M., Kockar, I., McGregor, P., The economics of distributed energy generation: A literature review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42 (2015), pp. 543-556.
  6. Ahn, J., Woo, J., Lee, J., Optimal allocation of energy sources for sustainable development in South Korea: Focus on the electric power generation industry, Energy Policy, 78 (2015), pp. 78-90.
  7. Osmani, A., Zhang, J., Gonela, V., Awudu, I., Electricity generation from renewables in the United States: Resource potential, current usage, technical status, challenges, strategies, policies, and future directions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24 (2013), pp. 454-472.
  8. IEA Statistics, Key Coal Trends Excerpt from: Coal Information, 2015.
  9. Coal-Energy for Sustainable Development, World Coal Association,, 2012 April, United Kingdom.
  10. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization
  11. Karakaya, E., Paris Climate Treaty: An Evaluation on Content and Turkey, Adnan Menderes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 3 (2016), 1, pp 1-12,
  12. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources
  13. Demirbaş, A., Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey, Energy Conversion and Management, 44 (2003), 1, pp. 203-213.
  14. Yüksel, I., Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey, Renewable Energy, 35 (2010), 7, pp. 1469-1476.
  15. Kaygusuz, K., Energy policy and climate change in Turkey, Energy Conversion and Management, 44 (2003), 10, pp. 1671-1688.
  16. Şahin, Ü., Aşıcı, A., A., Acar, S., Bal, G., P., Karababa, O., A., Kurnaz, L., Coal Report Turkey's Coal Polıcıes Related To Clımate Change, Economy And Health, Istanbul Policy Center, April 2016.
  17. International Energy Outlook, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013.
  18. Key World Energy Statistics, International Energy Agency, 2014.
  19. Valentine, V., S., The socio-political economy of electricity generation in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32 (2014), pp. 416-429.
  20. Zhang, M., Liu, X., Wang, W., Zhou, M., Decomposition Analysis of CO2 Emissions from Electricity Generation in China, Energy Policy, 52 (2013), pp. 159-165.
  21. Osmani, A., Zhang, J., Gonela, V., Awudu, I., Electricity Generation from Renewables in the United States: Resource Potential, Current Usage, Technical Status, Challenges, Strategies, Policies, and Future Directions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24 (2013), pp. 454-472.
  22. Lee, Y., C., Zhou, P., Directional Shadow Price Estimation of CO2, SO2 and NOx in the United States Coal Power Industry 1990-2010, Energy Economics, 51 (2015), pp. 493-502.
  23. Bildirici, E., M., Bakirtas, T., The Relationship Among Oil, Natural Gas and Coal Consumption and Economic Growth in BRICTS (Brazil, Russian, India, China, Turkey and South Africa) countries, Energy, 65 (2014), pp. 134-144.
  24. Pahle, M., Germany's Dash for Coal: Exploring Drivers and Factors, Energy Policy, 38 (2010), pp. 3431-3442.
  25. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources Strategy Development Presidency, World and Country Energy and Natural Resources View, Issue: 14, 1 October 2016,
  26. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company
  27. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration in Turkey, Turkey's Mine Reserves,
  28. Acar, S., Lucy Kitson L., Bridle, R., Coal and Renewable Energy Incentives in Turkey, Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, March 2015.
  29. Aktaş, M., Coal Mınıng In Turkey And Role In Energy
  30. Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry State Planning Organization, Electricity Market and Supply Security Strategy Document
  31. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources 2015-2019 Strategic Plan
  32. International agreement text between Turkey and Japan, Official Gazette, (Access date: 02.01.2017).
  33. International agreement text between Turkey and Russia, Official Gazette,, (Access date: 03.01.2017).
  34. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism
  35. Turkish Republic Prime Ministry Turkey Investment Support and Introduction Agency, Incentives
  36. Özsoy, E., C., Low Carbon Economy And Carbon Foot Lıst Of Turkey, International Journal of Labor and Society, 4 (2015), 9, pp. 15-31.
  37. ATIS, S., ONAT, N., GUNEY, K. R. I., Assessment of The Turkey's Electrıc Power Polıcıes In Terms of Sustaınabılıty, Thermal Science, 18 (2014), 3, pp. 695-707.

© 2022 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence