International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links


2011 is the international year of chemistry, and it is exactly 100 years past after the P. Langevin promotion of “twin paradox” problem. The hundred year old problem still demands its solution. Twin paradox, established by a physicist, has been representing a nightmare for philosophers, physicists, chemists, and biologists until these days. After a hundred years, it is time to try to close this page in long history of misunderstanding of the special relativity. This analysis has three main assumptions. First, biological systems are a part of physical world and therefore they behave in accordance to the physical laws according to Schrödinger. Second, according to Von Bertalanffy the biological systems are open thermodynamic systems. Because of that the approach of non-equilibrium thermodynamics was used for analyzing the twin paradox. Third, rise of entropy is according to Hyflick strongly connected with aging. Entropy can be taken as a measure of cell age or even human age according to Silva et al. and Gladyshev. So entropy invariance strongly suggests that both twins should be the same age, so there is a potential problem for twin paradox with the second law. The only possible influence of relativity on the chemical reaction rate is time dilatation. However time flow does not cause the aging process, so time dilatation cannot have any influence on it. So, after detailed analysis, it is concluded that there is no twin paradox in reality. Both twins will be exactly in same thermodynamic state and bio-logical age. The traveler twin will notice time dilatation, but this relativistic effect has no influence on the aging process.
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2011-09-19
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
  1. Resnick, R., The Twin Paradox, Introduction to Special Relativity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA
  2. Langevin, P. L , The Evolution of Space and Time, Scientia, 19 (1911), 3, pp. 31-54
  3. Gron, O., The Twin Paradox in the Theory of Relativity, Eur. J. Phys., 27 (2006), 4, pp. 885-889
  4. Popović, M., Laying the Ghost of Twin Paradox, Thermal Science, 3 (2009), 2, pp. 217-224
  5. Bowen, R. L, Atwood, C. S.,Living and Dying for Sex, A Theory of Aging Based on the Modulation of Cell Cycle Signaling by Reproductive Hormones. Gerontology, 50 (2004), 5, pp. 265-290
  6. Izaks, G., Westendorp, R., Ill or Just Old? Towards a Conceptual Framework of the Relation between Ageing and Disease, BMC Geriatrics, 3 (2003), 7
  7. Hayflick, L, Entropy Explains Aging, Genetic Determinism Explains Longevity, and Undefined Terminology Explains Misunderstanding Both, PLoS Genet, 3 (2007), 12, e220
  8. Schrodinger, E.,What is Life?
  9. Bertalanffy, K. L. von, The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology, Science, 111 (1950), 2872, pp. 23-29
  10. Bertalanffy, K. L., Basic Concepts in Quantitative Biology of Metabolism, Helgolander wissenschaft-liche Meeresuntersuchungen, 9 (1964), 1-4, pp. 5-37
  11. Hayflick, L., Biological Aging is no Longer an Unsolved Problem, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1100 (2007), pp. 1-13
  12. Hayflick, L., How and Why We Age, Experimental Gerontology, 33 (1998), 7-8, pp. 639-653
  13. Silva, C., Annamalai, K., Entropy Generation and Human Aging, Lifespan Enropy and Effect of Physical Activity Level, Entropy, 10 (2008), 2, pp. 100-123
  14. Gladyshev, G. P., Thermodynamics of Aging, Biology Bulletin, 5 (1998), 5, pp. 533-543
  15. Gladyshev, G. P., On Thermodynamics, Entropy and Evolution of Biological Systems, What is Life from a Physical Chemist's Viewpoint, Entropy, 1 (1999), 2, pp. 9-20
  16. Ho, M.-W., The Rainbow and the Worm, The Physics of Organisms, 3rd ed., World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 2008,
  17. Hayflick, L., Mortality and Immortality at the Cellular Level, Biochemistry, 62 (1997), 11, pp. 1180-1190
  18. Prigogine, I., Lefever, R., Stability and Self-Organization in Open Systems, in: Advances in Chemical Physics: Membranes, Dissipative Structures and Evolution, Vol. 29 (Eds. G. Nicolis, R. Lefever), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New York, USA, 2007
  19. Tolman, R., Relativity Thermodynamics and Cosmology, University Press, Oxford, UK, 1949, pp. 152-162
  20. Planck, M., The Dynamics of the Moving System (in German), Annalen der Physik, 26 (1908), 6, pp. 1-34
  21. Penrose, R., The Apparent Shape of a Relativistically Moving Sphere. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 55 (1959), 1, pp. 137-139
  22. Moore, T. A., Six Ideas that Shaped Physics, Unit R: The Laws of Physics Are Frame-Independent, WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass, USA, 1998
  23. Alonso, M., Finn, E. J., Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Penn., USA, 1996, pp. 492-493
  24. Terrel, J., Invisibility of Lorentz Contraction, Physical Review, 116 (1950), 4, pp. 1041-1045
  25. Rohrlich, F., True and Apparent Transformations, Classical Electrons and Relativistic Thermodynamics, Il Nuovo Cimento B, 45, (1966), 1, pp. 76-83
  26. Ives, H. E., Apparent Length and Times in System Experiencing the Fitzgerald-Larmor-Lorentz Contractions, JOSA, 27 (1937), 9, pp. 310-313
  27. Popović, M., Analysis of Relativistic Compression Process, International Review of Chemical Thermodynamics, 1 (2011), 3, pp. 61-67
  28. Popović, M., Equation of State in Form which Relates Mol Fraction and Molarity of Two (or more) Component Thermodynamic System Consisted of Ideal Gases, and its Applications, Thermal Science, 14 (2010), 3, pp. 859-863
  29. Bomarshenko, E., Measurable Values, Numbers and Fundamental Physical Constants: Is the Boltzmann Constant kB a Fundamental Physical Constant?, Thermal Science, 13 (2009), 4, pp. 253-258

© 2019 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence