THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Influence of cerium oxide nanoparticles on methyl tertiary butyl ether-gasoline blend in spark ignition engine

ABSTRACT
The search for suitable alternative for fossil fuel has been a challenge to the research community for the past two decades. So many alternatives have been identified and tested. However, a complete replacement cannot be provided without any penalties of cost, excess emission, poor operation, etc. The alcohols gave a new opportunity and a solution for the above problem but had some setbacks of increased density and lower octane number. The present workfocuses on striking a balance between advantages and disadvantages by using oxygenated additive with gasoline fuel. The additive cerium oxide (CeO2) along with methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)offers many advantages. The seven samples, namely M10, M15, M20, M25, M20+50mg/l, M20+100mg/l, M20+150 mg/lhave been preparedand tested on Sprk Ignition (SI) engine. Here, 10, 15, 20,and 25 denote the MTBE volume in blends and 50 mg/l, 100mg/l, and 150mg/l indicate the CeO2 in blends. The results have shown that only MTBE has caused an increase of 4% in Brake Thermal Efficiency (BTE)with M15 and then BTE has improved by 3% with M15+100mg/l compared with pure gasoline. And, fuel consumption has also been reduced upto 9% with M20 and 11% with M15+150mg/l compared with pure gasoline. The maximum HC and CO reductions have also been observed from M20 and M20+150mg/l ; it was up to 19% and 22%, 23% ,and 25% of HC and CO with M20, M20+ 150mg/l. However, there has been an increase in CO2 emission level because of excessive unburnt hydrocarbon (HC) reduction. The MTBE with CeO2 has proved to be suited to all running conditions. The blends having more amounts of additive produce good combustion characteristics yet it should be restricted within 20 vol% of MTBE and 150mg/l of CeO2.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2021-11-30
PAPER REVISED: 2022-01-15
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2022-01-29
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2022-03-05
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI211130034D
REFERENCES
  1. Abhishek Singh., et al., Vibration Analysis of Variable Compression Ratio Engine using Virtual Instrumentation. Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) IIT Guwahati, Assam, India.
  2. Abu-Zaid M., et al., (2004) Effect of Methanol Addition on the Performance of Spark Ignition Engines. Energy Fuels, 18( 2004), 2, pp.312-315.
  3. Adnan Parlak., The effect of heat transfer on performance of the diesel cycle and energy of the exhaust gas stream in a LHR diesel engine at the optimum injection timing. Journal of Energy conservation management, 46 (2005), pp. 167-179.
  4. Agarwal AK., et al., Combustion, performance, emissions and particulate characterization of a methanol-gasoline blend (gasohol) fueled medium duty spark ignition transportation engine. Fuel Process Technology, 121 (2014), pp.16-24.
  5. Agarwal, AK., Biofuels (Alcohols and Biodiesel) Applications as Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 33 (2007),3, pp.233-271.
  6. Akhilesh Kumar Choudhary.,et al., Optimization of Combustion Performance of Bioethanol (Water Hyacinth) Diesel Blends on Diesel Engine using Response Surface Methodology. Arabian journalof science and engineering, 40 (2015),12, pp. 3675-3695.
  7. Akutsu, Y, Toyoda., et al., Effect of Exhaust from Alcohol Fuel on Ozone Formation in the Atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 25 (1991), 7, pp.1383-1389.
  8. Alam, M., et al., Performance of NOx catalyst in a D. I diesel engine operated with neat dimethyl ether. SAE International, 1999-01-3599.
  9. Alessandro Goldaniga., et al., (1998) Oxidation of oxygenated octane improvers: MTBE, ETBE, DIPE, and TAME. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27, (1998),1, pp. 353-360.
  10. Alessia Arteconi., et al., Emissions from Ethers and Organic Carbonate Fuel Additives: A Review. Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 201, (2011),405.
  11. Alexandrian M., & SchwalmM., Comparison of Ethanol and Gasoline as Automotive Fuels. In Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, (1992), pp. 542-549.
  12. Al-HasanM., Effect of Ethanol-Unleaded Gasoline Blends on Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions. Energy Conversion and Management, 44 (2003),9, pp.1547-1561
  13. Ali OM., et al., Effect of diethyl ether additives on palm biodiesel fuel characteristics and low temperature flow properties. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 52 (2013), pp. 111-120.
  14. AlirezaBaheri& MohammadaminTajvidi., Simulation and analysis of an internal combustion engine with variable compression ratio. International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Research Technology, 4 (2015), 12.
  15. Alok Kumar., et al., Experimental Investigations on the Performance, Combustion and Emission characteristics of alcohol blended gasoline in a spark Ignition Engine. SAE Technical Paper. (2008) 2008-28-0068.
  16. AnishRaman. C., et al., Analysis of MTBE as an Oxygenate Additive to Gasoline. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 7 (2014), pp. 712-718.
  17. BabazadehShayanSoheil., et al., Effect of Oxygenates Blending with Gasoline to Improve Fuel Properties. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 25(2012),4.
  18. Christine Achten., Wilhelm Puttmann. Method for determination of methyl tert-butyl ether in gasoline by gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography, 910 (2001), pp. 377-383.
  19. Juhun Song.,et al., Effect of Oxygenated Fuel on Combustion and Emissions in a Light-Duty Turbo Diesel Engine. Energy Fuels, 16 (2002), 2, pp. 294-301.
  20. Mohammed Shamim., et al., Characterization on Gasoline Engine Using MTBE and DIE Additives. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology,4(2017), 3, pp.190-199.
  21. Sathishkumar P., et al., Performance analysis of diesel engine with diesel ,ehanol and vegetable oil blends. International Journal Chemical sciences, 13( 2015) 2, pp. 576-584.
  22. Syed Halim Hamid & Mohammed Ashraf Ali., Effect of MTBE Blending on the Properties of Gasoline. Fuel Science and Technology International, 13(5) (2010), 509-544.
  23. Trifa M. Ahmed, Christoffer Bergvall, Roger Westerholm. Emissions of particulate associated oxygenated and native polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from vehicles powered by ethanol and gasoline fuel blends. Fuel, 2(14) (2018), 381-385.
  24. Chinnappan, R., Chandran, M., Elavarasan, R.M. et al. Influence of hybrid SiO2 and CeO2 nanoparticles on diesel engine emission operated with distilled tire oil blend. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2022). doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17883-8
  25. Chandran Mohanraj, Tamilkolundu Senthilkumar, Murugesan Chandrasekar, Investigation of the performance, combustion parameters and emissions analysis on DI engine using two staged distilled waste plastic oil-diesel blends. Thermal Science, 22(3) (2018), 1469-1480.
  26. Dhanapal Balaji, Mani Varmaa, Pachamuthu Senthilkumar, Influence of diethyl ether blend in spark ignition engine performance and emissions operated with gasoline and ethanol, Thermal Science, 20(14) (2016), 1053-1060.