THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

INFERENCES BASED ON TYPE-I CENSORING COMPETING RISKS DATA OF POWER HAZARD RATE MODELS IN THE PRESENCE OF PARTIALLY OBSERVED CAUSES OF FAILURE

ABSTRACT
When population units fail for several reasons, the competing risks model is triggered. The failure time and associated reason of failure are noted in this model. It is possible to partially observe the reasons why the competing risks model fails. In this work, where the failure time is distributed with the power hazard rate distribution, we utilize the competing risks model under partially observed reasons of failure. We develop maximum likelihood estimators of the model parameters with related estimated confidence intervals based on the independent type-I censoring competing risks data. Two distinct approaches are used to construct the bootstrap point estimate and associated bootstrap confidence ranges. Analysis is done using actual type-I competing risks data that has some failure causes missing at random.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-08-10
PAPER REVISED: 2024-10-13
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-10-30
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2025-01-25
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI2406011A
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2024, VOLUME 28, ISSUE Issue 6, PAGES [5011 - 5018]
REFERENCES
  1. Rinne, H., The Hazard Rate: Theory And Inference, Justus-Liebig University Press, Giessen, Germany, 2014
  2. Mugdadi, A. R., The Least Squares Type Estimation of the Parameters in the Power Hazard Function, Applied Mathematics Computation, 169 (2005), 2, pp. 737-748
  3. Han, D., Kundu, D., Inference for a Step-Stress Model with Competing Risks for Failure from the Generalized Exponential Distribution under Type-I Censoring, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 64 (2015), 1, pp. 31-43
  4. Koley, A, Kundu, D., On Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring in Presence of Competing Risks, Metrika, 80 (2017), Feb., pp. 401-426
  5. Abu-Zinadah, H. A., Neveen S. A., Competing Risks Model with Partially Step-Stress Accelerate Life Tests in Analyses Lifetime Chen Data under Type-II Censoring Scheme, Open Phys, 17 (2019), Apr., pp. 192-199
  6. Algarni, A., et al., Statistical Analysis of Competing Risks Lifetime Data from Nadarajaha and Abdullah M. Haghighi Distribution under Type-II Censoring, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38 (2019), 3, pp. 2591-2601
  7. Almarashi, et al., Inferences for Joint Hybrid Progressive Censored Exponential Lifetimes under Competing Risk Model, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021 (2021), Aug., pp. 1-12
  8. Abushal, T. A., et al., Statistical Inferences of Burr XII Lifetime Models under Joint Type-1 Competing risks Samples, Journal of Mathmetics, 2021 (2021), Dec., pp. 1-16
  9. Alghamdi, A. S., et al., Statistical Inference of Jointly Type-II Lifetime Samples under Weibull Competing Risks Models, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 4, pp. 1-17
  10. Abushal, T. A., et al., Inference of Partially Observed Causes for Failure of Lomax Competing Risks Model under Type-II generalized Hybrid Censoring Scheme, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61 (2021), 7, pp. 5427-5439
  11. Farghal A. A., et al., Analysis of Generalized Inverted Exponential Competing Risks Model in Presence of Partially Observed Failure Modes, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 78 (2023), Sept., pp. 74-87
  12. Xu, J. Long, J. S., Using the Delta Method Tonconstruct Confidence Intervals for Predicted Probabilities, Rates, and Discrete Changes, in: Lecture Notes, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind., USA, 2005
  13. Wang L., et al., Inference for Weibull Competing Risks Model with Partially Observed Failure Causes under Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 368 (2020), 112537
  14. Davison, A. C., Hinkley, D. V., Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications, 2nd, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997
  15. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R. J., An Introduction the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall, New York, USA, 1993
  16. Efron, B., The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, Proceedings, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Phiadelphia, Penn., USA, 1982, Vol. 38
  17. Hall P., Theoretical Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Intervals, Annals of Statistics, 16 (1988), 3, pp. 927-953
  18. Abed-Elmougod, G. A., El-Sayed M. A., Coefficient of Variation of Topp-Leone Distribution under Adaptive Type-II Progressive Censoring Scheme: Bayesian and non-Bayesian Approach, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 12 (2016), 11, pp. 4028-4035
  19. Hoel, D. G., A Representation of Mortality Data by Competing Risks, Biometrics, 28 (1972), 2, pp. 475-88
  20. Pareek, B., et al., On Progressively Censored Competing Risks Data for Weibull Distributions, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 53 (2009), 12, pp. 4083-4094
  21. Sarhan, A. M., et al., Statistical Analysis Of Competing Risks Models, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 95 (2010)., 9, pp. 953-962
  22. Cramer, E., Schmiedt, A. B., Progressively Type-II Censored Competing Risks Data from Lomax Distributions, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55 (2011), 3, pp. 1285-1303
  23. Al-Essa, L. A., et al., Comparative Study with Applications for Gompertz Models under Competing Risks and Generalized Hybrid Censoring Schemes, Aximos, 12 (2023), 4, 322
  24. Al-Essa, L. A., et al., Statistical Inference of Joint Competing Risks Models from Comparative Bathtub Shape Distributions with Hybrid Censoring, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 86 (2024), Jan., pp. 9-22

2025 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the VinĨa Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence