International Scientific Journal


The object of this research is the new concept of the original universal system for air quality and energy control in laboratory conditions (wet scrubbing system) based on the „clean air in/out“ principle. Namely, the process involves a partial or complete exchange of recirculated treated air. From the aspect of water, as a pure medium, the system is characterized by broad application in the open, semi-open, and closed air treatment systems: primarily in the breeding and accompanying agricultural facilities, industrial, cultural, sports, tourist, medical and other controlled spaces. The analysis showed that the system at its inlet unit and with the block structure and logical phase development, proved energy, environ-mental and qualitative efficiency in the removal of PM10 and PM2.5 particles from the controlled dust doses in laboratory air. The measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were performed with two Alphasense OPC-N3 optical counters at the inlet and outlet of the system. Five operating regimes with frequency regulated number of revolutions of the turbo elements that was taken as an independent variable, achieved different degrees of removal of PM10 and PM2.5 from the treated laboratory air: 97.70-98.53% and 62.19-75.75%, respectively. The assessment of system energy use was done by parallel measuring of electric power and comparative deviations of its absolute values in the first decimal. Energy consumption for the treatment of 1m3 of air ranged from 0.00011- 0.00016 kWm–3. Statistical analysis of qualitative indicators revealed significant differences between the operating regimes and the obtained values.
PAPER REVISED: 2022-05-10
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2022-05-23
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2022, VOLUME 26, ISSUE Issue 6, PAGES [4819 - 4829]
  1. Takai, H., et al., Concentrations and Emissions of Airborne Dust in Livestock Buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 70 (1998) 59-77.
  2. Wathes, C. M., Ventilation in stables. Farm Buildings and Engineering, 6 (1989), 21-25.
  3. Banhazi, T. M., et al., Identification of the risk factors for high airborne particle concentrations in broiler buildings using statistical modeling. Biosystems Engineering 101 (2008), 100-110.
  4. Donham, al., Environmental and health studies of farm workers in Swedish swine confinement buildings. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(1989)1, 31-37.
  5. Harry, E.G., Air pollution in farm buildings and methods of control - review. Avian Pathology 7(1978) 4, 441-454.
  6. Carpenter. G, A., Dust in Livestock Buildings - Review of Some Aspects. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research. 33 (1986), 227-241.
  7. Takai, H., et al., Ammoniacontents and desorption from dusts collected in livestock buildings. Agric. Eng. International: CIGR J. Scientific Res. and Development 4, (2002).
  8. Banhazi, T. M., et al., Identification of Risk Factors for Sub-Optimal Housing Conditions in Australian Piggeries: Part 2. Airborne Pollutants. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 14(2008) 1, 21-39.
  9. Bottcher, R. W., An environmental nuisance: Odor concentrated and transported by dust.Chem. Senses 26(2001)3: 327‐331.
  10. Takai, H., et al., Dust Concentrations in Animal Indoor Environments in Northern Europe. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Livestock Environment; 1997; Bloomington, MN, pp 504-511.
  11. Tan, Z., Zhang, Y., A Review of Effects and Control Methods of Particulate Matter in Animal Indoor Environments. Air & Waste Management Association, 54 (2004): 845-854.
  12. Cermak, J.P., Ross, P.A., Airborne Dust Concentrations Associated with Animal Housing Tasks; Farm Build. Prog. 51(1978), 11-15.
  13. Pearson, C.G., Air Cleaning for Livestock Production Buildings; Farm Build. Environ. 5(1988), 13-17.
  14. Pearson, C. C., Sharples, T. J., Airborne Dust Concentrations in Livestock Buildings and the Effect of Feed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 60(1995) 3, 145-154.
  15. Dawson, J. R., Minimizing Dust in Livestock Buildings: Possible Alternatives to Mechanical Separation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. Vol. 47 (1990), 235-248.
  16. Nowak, D., Health effects of airborne pollutants, particularly in swine confinement stalls, from the viewpoint of occupational medicine]. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1998 Jun; 105(6):225-34.
  17. Hoek, G., et al., Daily mortality and air pollution in The Netherlands. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 50(2000)8, 1380-1389.
  18. Pope, C.A., et al., Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. The Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (2002) 9, 1132-1141
  19. Andersen, C.I., et al., Respiratory symptoms and airway obstruction in swine veterinarians: a persistent problem. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 46 (2004) 4, 386-392.
  20. Davis, M. L., Cornwell, D.A., Introduction to Environmental Engineering; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
  21. Zavaleta, D., Wilson, W.O., Poultry House Dust, Odours and Feathers A Review; World's Poultry Sci. J., 32 (1976)4, 333-338.
  22. Rosentrater, K.A. Performance of an Electrostatic Dust Collection System in Swine Facilities; Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGR J. Sci. Res. Dev. Manuscript BC 03 003, 2003.
  23. Phillips, V.R., et al., The development of robust methods for measuring concentrations and emission rates of gaseous and particulate air pollutants in livestock buildings. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 70 (1998) 1, 11-24.
  24. Grantz, D.A., Ecological effects of particulate matter. Environment International 29 (2003)2-3, 213-239.
  25. Cambra-López María., Control of particulate matter emissions from poultry and pig houses. Ph.D. thesis University of Valencia, Spain, 2010.
  26. Amuhanna, E., Dust control in livestock buildings with electrostatically charged water spray. PhD thesis, Kansas State University, 236 pp, 2007.
  27. Ogink, N.W.M., Aarnink, A.J.A., Removal of PM10 and PM2.5 by combined air scrubbers in livestock operations. In: Proceedings of Dust Conf 2007. How to Improve Air Quality. International Conference, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  28. Ogink, N.W.M., et al., Multi-pollutant and one-stage scrubbers for removal of ammonia, odor and particulate matter from animal house exhaust air. In: Proceedings of International Symposium Livestock and Environment. ILES VIII, Iguassu, Brazil, 2008.
  29. Zhao, Y., et al., Removal efficiency of dust and bacteria by multi-stage air scrubbers in a pig house. In: Proceedings of International Symposium Livestock and Environment. ILES VIII, Iguassu, Brazil, 2008.
  30. Cambra-López, Maria.,. Airborne particulate matter from livestock production systems: A review of an air pollution problem. Environmental Pollution, 158(2010)1, 1-17.
  31. OECD. (2008). Environmental performance of agriculture in OECD countries since 1990. Paris, France: OECD
  32. Costantino, A., et al., Energy use for climate control of animal houses: The state of the art in Europe. Energy Proc. 101(2016), 184-191.
  33. Jerez S. B., et al., Quantification of ventilation effectiveness for air quality control in animal buildings. In ASHRAE Transactions - ASHRAE Winter Conference (PART 1 ed., pp. 460-468). (ASHRAE Transactions; Vol. 120, No. PART 1). Amer. Soc. Heating, Ref. Air-Conditioning Eng. Inc, 2014.
  34. St-Pierre, N. R., et al., Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J. Dairy Sci. 86(2003), E52-E77.
  35. Zhao, Y., Effectiveness of multi-stage scrubbers in reducing emission of air pollutants from pig houses. ASABE Vol. 54(2011) 1: 285-293.

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence