THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Xiangyang Peng

,

Honglei Deng

,

Rui Wang

,

Zhao Liu

,

Shujian Luo

,

Deming Guo

,

Gang Liu

IMPROVEMENT AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF EQUIVALENT HEAT TRANSFER MODEL FOR DYNAMIC THERMAL RATING OF OVERHEAD LINES

ABSTRACT
With the rapid growth of power demand, the conductor ampacity calculation method based on the dynamic thermal rating (DTR) becomes more and more important. Based on the shortcomings of the current DTR models, a new DTR model that does not need to measure the wind speed and the operating state of conductor is proposed, which is called the equivalent heat transfer (EHT) model. However, there are still shortcomings in the accuracy of the EHT model in application. In this paper, the EHT model is improved at first according to the consideration of the effect of air physical parameters and the redetermination of the experimental parameters of the EHT equipment. Then, the operation of EHT equipment is simulated through the established experimental platform. The improved EHT model is verified by the IEEE standard. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of the improved EHT model is carried out. The results show that the improved EHT model is greatly improved on application accuracy compared to the original EHT model. Moreover, the improved EHT model can choose the steady-state temperature at any position on the surface of the aluminum ball to calculate the conductor ampacity, and the relative error does not exceed 6%. The improved EHT model is reliable and can meet the safe operation requirements of the power system in practical engineering applications.
KEYWORDS
Conductor ampacity, improved EHT model, sensitivity analysis, overhead lines, heat transfer
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2021-06-11
PAPER REVISED: 2021-10-11
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2021-11-08
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2022-03-05
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI210611020P
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2022, VOLUME 26, ISSUE Issue 6, PAGES [4669 - 4683]
REFERENCES
  1. Mbuli, N., et al., A Literature Review on Capacity Uprate of Transmission Lines: 2008 to 2018, Electric Power Systems Research, 170. (2019), pp. 215-221
  2. Teh, J., et al., Prospects of Using the Dynamic Thermal Rating System for Reliable Electrical Networks: A Review, IEEE Access, 6. (2018), pp. 26765-26778
  3. Uski, S., Estimation Method for Dynamic Line Rating Potential and Economic Benefits, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 65. (2015), pp. 76-82
  4. Silva, A.A.P., J.M.B. Bezerra, Applicability and Limitations of Ampacity Models for HTLS Conductors, Electric Power Systems Research, 93. (2012), pp. 61-66
  5. Thirumurugaveerakumar, S., et al., Prediction and Comparison of Size of the Copper and Aluminum Bus Duct System Based on Ampacity and Temperature Variations Using Matlab, Thermal Science, 22. (2018), 2, pp. 1049-1057
  6. House, K.E.,P.D. Tuttle, Current-Carrying Capacity of Acsr, Electrical Engineering, 77. (1958), 8, pp. 719-719
  7. Howington, B.S., Ramon, G. J. , Dynamic Thermal Line Rating Summary and Status of the State-of-the-Art Technology, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, PWRD-2. (1987), 3, pp. 851-8
  8. Kanálik, M., et al., Temperature calculation of overhead power line conductors based on CIGRE Technical Brochure 601 in Slovakia, Electrical Engineering, 101. (2019), pp. 921-933
  9. Ľubomír, B., et al., Calculation of the overhead transmission line conductor temperature in real operating conditions, Electrical Engineering, 103. (2021), pp. 769-780
  10. Hasan, M.K., et al., An Improved Dynamic Thermal Current Rating Model for PMU-Based Wide Area Measurement Framework for Reliability Analysis Utilizing Sensor Cloud System, IEEE Access, 9. (2021), pp. 14446-14458
  11. Castro, P., et al., Study of Different Mathematical Approaches in Determining the Dynamic Rating of Overhead Power Lines and A Comparison with Real Time Monitoring Data, Applied Thermal Engineering, 111. (2017), pp. 95-102
  12. Foss, S.D., R.A. Maraio, Dynamic Line Rating in the Operating Environment, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 5. (1990), 2, pp. 1095-1105
  13. Smolleck, H.A., J.P. Sims, Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Bare ACSR Conductors with Regard to Current-Carrying Capacity, Electric Power Systems Research, 5. (1982), 3, pp. 179-190
  14. Seppa, T.O., Accurate Ampacity Determination: Temperature-Sag Model for Operational Real Time Ratings, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 10. (1995), 3, pp. 1460-1470
  15. Bose, A., Smart Transmission Grid Applications and Their Supporting Infrastructure, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1. (2010), 1, pp. 11-19
  16. Polevoy, A., Impact of Data Errors on Sag Calculation Accuracy for Overhead Transmission Line, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29. (2014), 5, pp. 2040-2045
  17. Liu, Z., et al., An Equivalent Heat Transfer Model Instead of Wind Speed Measuring for Dynamic Thermal Rating of Transmission Lines, Energies, 13. (2020), 18, pp. 1-18
  18. IEEE 738-2012, IEEE Standard for Calculating the Current-Temperature Relationship of Bare Overhead Conductors, in:IEEE Standard Association, Washington, USA, 2013, pp. 1-72
  19. Hsissou, R., et al., Polymer Composite Materials: A Comprehensive Review, Composite Structures, 262. (2021), pp. 1-15
  20. Whitaker, S., Forced Convection Heat Transfer Correlations for Flow in Pipes, Past Flat Plates, Single Cylinders, Single Spheres, and for Flow in Packed Beds and Tube Bundles, AIChE Journal, 18. (1972), 2, pp. 361-371
  21. Hua, G.W., et al., Research on Identification of Model Predictive Control Parameters for Interline Power Flow Controller, GuangDong Electric Power, 34. (2021), 2, pp. 19-27
  22. Liu, K., et al., Study on Value of Wind Load Adjustment Coefficient for Foundation Design of Tangent Tower of Transmission Line, GuangDong Electric Power, 32. (2019), 8, pp. 141-149
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Improvement and sensitivity analysis of equivalent heat transfer model for dynamic thermal rating of overhead lines

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence