THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links

EVALUATION OF THE SUITABILITY OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS IN QINGPU DISTRICT, SHANGHAI

ABSTRACT
In recent decades, people's attention to human settlements has been increasing. However, the research on the evaluation method of the suitability of human set-tlements is still in the exploratory stage, and there is no universally accepted evaluation method worldwide. Considering the uncertainty in the evaluation index system, this paper combines the set pair analysis theory and the Logistic model to construct a new evaluation model of the suitability of human settlements and applies the model to the dynamic evaluation of the suitability of human settlements in Qingpu district from 2007 to 2016. The evaluation results show that the overall suitability of human settlements in Qingpu district is on the rise. Based on the analysis of the evaluation results, this paper puts forward some opinions on the development plan of Qingpu District and verifies the validity of the constructed model.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2020-03-01
PAPER REVISED: 2021-08-10
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2021-08-10
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2021-12-18
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200301341L
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2022, VOLUME 26, ISSUE Issue 3, PAGES [2569 - 2576]
REFERENCES
  1. Sun, B.Y., Yang, X.H., The input and output relationship of water resource in Jilin from 2004 to 2017, Thermal Science, 24 (2020), 4, pp. 2337-2345.
  2. Wu, F.F., et al., Regional and seasonal variations of outdoor thermal comfort in China from 1966 to 2016, Science of the Total Environment, 665 (2019), pp. 1003-1016.
  3. Sun, B.Y., et al., Evaluation of water use efficiency of 31 provinces and Municipalities in China using multi-level entropy weight method synthesized indexes and data envelopment analysis, Sustainability, 11 (2019), 17, pp. 1-8.
  4. Chen, Y., et al., Review of Literatures on Human Settlements, World Regional Studies, 2 (2007), pp. 17-24.
  5. Register, R., et al., When Ecology Meets Economy — Interview with Richard Register, Urban Environment Design, 3 (2016), pp. 206-214.
  6. Li, Y.J., et al., Review of the Theories and Methods of Livable City, Progress in Geography, 3 (2008), pp. 101-109.
  7. Li, L., et al. Modelling and filtering for a stochastic uncertain system in a complex scenario, Thermal Science, 25(2021), No.2, pp. 1411-1424; DOI10.2298/TSCI191201041L
  8. Liu, L., et al. Distributed State Estimation for Dynamic Positioning Systems with Uncertain Disturbances and Transmission Time Delays, Complexity, 2020, Jul., 7698504; DOI10.1155/2020/7698504
  9. Zhang, ZW; et al. Evidence integration credal classification algorithm versus missing data distributions, Information Sciences, 569(2021), Aug., pp.39-54
  10. Zhao, K.Q., Set pair analysis and its preliminary application, Discovery of Nature, 1 (1994), pp. 67-72.
  11. Zhao, K.Q., Xuan, A.L., Set pair theory - a new theory method of non-define and its applications, Systems Engineering, 1 (1996), pp. 18-23.
  12. Yang, X.H., et al., Hierarchy evaluation of water resources vulnerability under climate change in Beijing, China, Natural Hazards, 84 (2016), pp. 63-76.
  13. Chen, L.Y., et al., Application of five-element connection number to the quality assessment of eutrophication in lakes, Research of Environmental Sciences, 21 (2008), 3, pp. 82-86.
  14. Meng, X.M., Hu, H.P., Application of set pair analysis model based on entropy weight to comprehensive evaluation of water quality, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 40 (2009), 3, pp. 257-262.
  15. Liu, T., et al., Logistic set pair analysis model for water resources carrying capacity assessment and its application, Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 40 (2019), 1, pp. 27-33.
  16. Han. J, et al., Evaluation and forecast of livability for the global city: A case study of Shanghai, Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 1(2017), pp. 80-90.
  17. Yigitcanlar, T., et al., Towards prosperous sustainable cities: a multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach, Habitat International, 45(2015), 1, pp. 36-46.
  18. Wang, K., Song, H.Z., Comparative analysis of three objective weighting methods, Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 6 (2003), pp. 48-49.
  19. Guo, X.J., et al., Application of subjective and objective methods in weights determination of synthetic evaluation of science and technology, Science and Technology Management Research, 32 (2012), 20, pp. 64-67.
  20. Xue, Q.R., et al., A three-stage hybrid model for the regional assessment, spatial pattern analysis and source apportionment of the land resources comprehensive supporting capacity in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, Science of the Total Environment, 711 (2020), pp. 1-18.
  21. Diakoulaki, D., et al., Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers and Operations Research, 22 (1995), 7, pp. 763-770.
  22. Li, L.J., et al., Application of combination weighing method in fuzzy synthetic evaluation of power quality, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 4 (2007), pp. 56-60.

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence