THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

ANALYSIS OF THE ESTIMATED REMAINING SERVICE LIFE OF GAS RECTIFICATION COLUMNS

ABSTRACT
Gas rectification columns are process apparatuses which are very important part of each onshore plant. Sudden failure of these types of columns causes huge daily losses, while fluid leakage can be very dangerous for the people and hazardous for the environment. For that reason, a regular and correct examination of the column is of great importance for the continual process of leading. Together with the detailed examination of the column, a risk-based inspection was applied to maximize savings, both material, time, and costs. The expected remaining service life of rectification columns was also analyzed, while the corrosion rates were calculated according to the various international standards. The minimum required column wall thickness was calculated according to the most commonly used international standard and the obtained difference was analyzed. Detailed analysis of the total risks of the column due to potential failure is presented.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2020-12-14
PAPER REVISED: 2021-01-26
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2021-01-29
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2021-03-13
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI201214083J
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2021, VOLUME 25, ISSUE Issue 5, PAGES [3813 - 3823]
REFERENCES
  1. Mokhatab, S. S., Poe, W. A., Mak, J. Y., Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing - Principles and Practices, 4th ed, Elsevier, Cambridge, 2019
  2. Devold, H., Oil and Gas Production Handbook - An introduction to oil and gas production, transport, refining and petrochemical industry, 3rd ed, ABB Industries, Oslo, 2013
  3. Jarić, M. S., et al., Total Costs of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers with Concentric Helical Tube Coils, Thermal Science, 23 (2019), 6A, pp. 3661-3673
  4. Budimir, N. J., et al., Rectified Ethanol Production Cost Analysis 282, Thermal Science, 15 (2011), 2, pp. 281-292
  5. ***, API PR 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry, 3rd ed, American Petroleum Institute, 2020
  6. Wang, X., Duan, Q., Improved AHP-TOPSIS model for the comprehensive risk evaluation of oil and gas pipelines, Petroleum Science, 16 (2019), pp.1479-1492, doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-00365-5
  7. Bertolini, M., et al., Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance procedures for an oil refinery, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (2009) pp. 244-253, doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.01.003
  8. Kamsu-Foguem, B., Information structuring and risk-based inspection for the marineoil pipelines, Applied Ocean Research, 56 (2016), pp. 132-142, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.01.009
  9. Chang, M.G., et al., Application of risk based inspection in refinery and processing piping, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18 (2005) pp. 397-402, doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.036
  10. ***, API 581, Risk-Based Inspection Methodology, American Petroleum Institute, 2016
  11. Li, Z.X., et al., Study of evaluation method for the overseas oil and gas investment based on risk compensation, Petroleum Science, 17 (2020), pp. 858-871, doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00457-7
  12. Martic, I., et al., Remaining life determination for pressure vessel in a refinery, Structural Integrity and Life, 16 (2016), pp. 49-52
  13. Ishizaki, Y., et al., Remaining life assessment of an external pressure vessel in creep range and inspection findings, Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2017, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, 2017, doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65194
  14. Dedov, A., et al., Corrosion and life assessment of IntrexTM superheater tubes in a CFB oil shale boiler, Applied Thermal Engineering (2016), dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.061.
  15. Jayanto, S.T., et al., Estimating corrosion rate and remaining life of a pressure vessel of H2S absorber, AIP Conference Proceedings 2097, 2019, doi.org/10.1063/1.5098182
  16. Majstorović, M., Repairment of the Main Column DA-2301 in FCC, Structural Integrity and Life, 1 (2001) pp. 47-50
  17. ***, ISO 9224, Corrosion of metals and alloys. Corrosivity of atmospheres. Guiding values for the corrosivity categories, CEN, 2012
  18. ***, ASME SEC VIII, Division 1, 2019 ASME Boiler &Pressure Vessel Code 2019, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019
  19. ***, ASME SEC VIII, Division 2: Alternative Rules, 2017 ASME Boiler &Pressure Vessel Code 2017, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017
  20. ***, ISO 9223, Corrosion of metals and alloys. Corrosivity of atmospheres. Classification, determination and estimation, CEN, 2012
  21. ***, ISO 9226, Corrosion of metals and alloys. Corrosivity of atmospheres. Determination of corrosion rate of standard specimens for the evaluation of corrosivity, CEN, 2012
  22. ***, API 510, Pressure Vessel Inspector, American Petroleum Institute, 2020
  23. ***, API 572, Inspection of Pressure Vessels, American Petroleum Institute, 2020.
  24. Vianello, C., et al., A Risk-Based Tool to support the Inspection Management in Chemical Plants, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.005.
  25. Kirin, S., at al., Risk based analysis of RHPP penstock structural integrity, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 14, (2020), 53, pp. 345-352, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.27.

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence