THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TRIPLE FLAMES BY USING 2-D REACTION-DIFFUSION MANIFOLD TABULATION METHOD

ABSTRACT
The characteristics of partially-premixed flames is investigated by simulating a series of triple flames with different variations of chemical equivalent ratio. A 2-D reaction-diffusion manifold chemistry tabulation method is employed in the simulation and the results are compared with the CH4-air 19-step chemical reaction mechanism. The performance of these two mechanisms is then assessed by using direct numerical simulations coupled with GRI3.0 detailed mechanism. It is shown that both 2-D reaction-diffusion manifold table and 19-step simplified mechanism can describe the temperature and main products accurately, however, for some minor intermediary products, predictions from 2-D reaction-diffusion manifold table is observed to be better than 19-step simplified mechanism. Com-pared with the 19-step mechanism, 2-D reaction-diffusion manifold table only needs to solve only the transport equations for CO2 and N2 species, which greatly simplifies the solution process of chemical reaction and provides a reliable solution for the numerical simulation of turbulence with higher accuracy. This work indicates that as a relatively advanced kinetic simplified method, the reaction-diffusion manifold tabulation method can reduce the computational cost and at the same time retain the accuracy effectively.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2019-09-09
PAPER REVISED: 2020-06-17
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-06-19
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2020-07-11
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI190909198Z
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2021, VOLUME 25, ISSUE Issue 4, PAGES [2653 - 2664]
REFERENCES
  1. Fabienne, C., et al., Applications of Oxygen for NOx Control and CO2 Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants, Thermal Science, 10,3(2006):119-142.
  2. Kegl., et al., Influence of biodiesel on injection, fuel spray, and engine characteristics, Thermal Science, 12,2(2008):171-182.
  3. Nemoda., et al., Numerical simulation of porous burners and hole plate surface burners, Thermal Science, 8,1(2004):3-17.
  4. Jebamani, D., and Kumar, T., Studies on variable swirl intake system for DI diesel engine using computational fluid dynamics, Thermal Science, 12,1(2008):25-32.
  5. He, Z, X., et al., A numerical study of the effects of injection rate shape on combustion and emission of diesel engines, Thermal Science, 18,1(2014):67-78.
  6. Li, C., et al., Stabilization of Double Flames Interacting with the Intersecting Flow on a V-Shaped Burner, Combustion Science and Technology, 184,12(2012):2117-2135.
  7. Azzoni, et al., The structure of triple flames stabilized on a slot burner, Combustion & Flame, 119, 1-2(1998):23-40.
  8. Kurdyumov., et al., Dynamics of an edge flame in a mixing layer, Combustion and Flame, 139,4(2004):329-339.
  9. Aggarwal., Suresh, K., Extinction of laminar partially premixed flames, Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, 35,6(2009):528-570.
  10. Phillips, H., Flame in a buoyant methane layer, Symposium on Combustion, 10, 1(1965):1277-1283.
  11. Kim, M. K., et al., Effect of velocity gradient on propagation speed of tribrachial flames in laminar coflow jets, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31,1(2007):901-908.
  12. Qin, X., et al., Gravity, radiation, and coflow effects on partially premixed flames, Physics of Fluids, 16, 8(2004):2963.
  13. Kazuhiro, Y., et al., Behaviors of tribrachial edge flames and their interactions in a triple-port burner, Combustion and Flame, 162, 5(2015):1653-1659.
  14. Yuan, Ye., et al., Numerical study of the effects of the channel and nozzle wall on the transition behavior of a methane tribrachial flame in a confined flow, Fuel, 160(2015):366-374.
  15. Li, S. L., et al., The Generation of a Reduced Mechanism for Flame Inhibition by Phosphorus Containing Compounds Based on Path Flux Analysis Method, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 21, 4(2013):357-365.
  16. Lam, S. H., Using CSP to Understand Complex Chemical Kinetics, Combustion Science and Technology, 89, 5-6(1993):30.
  17. Lu, L. Y., et al., Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry in parallel PDF calculations, Journal of Computational Physics, 228, 15(2009):5490-5525.
  18. Maas, U., Pope, S.B., Implementation of simplified chemical kinetics based on intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds, Symposium on Combustion, 24, 1(1992):103-112.
  19. Oijen, J. A., et al., Modeling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds, Combustion and Flame, 127, 3(2001):2124-2134.
  20. Gicquel, O., et al., Laminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using Flame Prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 28, 2(2000):1901-1908.
  21. Fiorina, B., et al., Approximating the chemical structure of partially premixed and diffusion counterflow flames using FPI flamelet tabulation, Combustion and Flame, 140, 3(2005):147-160.
  22. Wu, H., et al., A Pareto-efficient combustion framework with submodel assignment for predicting complex flame configurations, Combustion and Flame, 162, 11(2015):4208-4230.
  23. S, Song., Large eddy simulation of multi-modal turbulent combustion based on FGM, MS. D. thesis, Zhejiang University, China,2014.
  24. Steinhilber, G, Maas. U., Reaction-diffusion manifolds for unconfined, lean premixed, piloted, turbulent methane/air systems, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34, 1(2013):217-224.
  25. Caijun, W., et al., Sub-grid scale combustion model based on REDIM method and its application, CIESC Journal (2015).
  26. Nguyen., et al., Multidimensional flamelet-generated manifolds for partially premixed combustion, Combustion and Flame, 157, 1(2010):43-61.
  27. Razus, D., et al., Experimental and computed burning velocities of propane-air mixtures, Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 12(2010):2979-2984.
  28. Kuznetsov, M., et al., Laminar burning velocities of hydrogen-oxygen-steam mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 1(2011):895-903.
  29. Szabó, T., et al., Parameterization of Laminar Burning Velocity Dependence on Pressure and Temperature in Hydrogen/Air/Steam Mixtures, Combustion Science and Technology, 184, 10-11(2012):1427-1444.
  30. Suresh, K., et al. Flame Structure Interactions and State Relationships in an Unsteady Partially Premixed Flame, AIAA Journal, 36, 7(1998): 1190-1199.
  31. Zhang, L., et al., Measurement and Analysis of 1-D OH Radicals Absolute Concentration in Flat Flame. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 23, 2(2017):161-165.
  32. Toshimitsu, K., et al., Numerical Simulations and Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence Imaging Results of Hypersonic Reactive Flow, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 16, 1(2000):16-21.

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence