International Scientific Journal


The main goal of this paper is to develop and prioritize renewable energy scenarios for electricity production. The model proposed in the paper was applied on the example of the municipality of Štrpce, enclave in south Kosovo**. The model consists out of three phases, and the decision-making and planning process involves a group of decision makers, i.e. selected experts and stakeholders. In the first phase, a group of decision makers, using a collaborative planning method and Homer pro software, defined eight renewable energy scenarios based on renewable energy potentials and electricity demand in Štrpce. In the second phase, a group of decision makers, using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis, defined a total of 22 criteria to evaluate scenarios. Finally, in the third phase, a group of decision makers used fuzzy analytical network process methodology to prioritize scenarios. Results show that a scenario that includes installation of photovoltaic panels in Štrpce households to cover 50% of the electricity demand is first ranked. The proposed model has a universal character which means that it can be applied in other municipalities/cities and regions. Also, the model enables collaborative planning through the inclusion of different stakeholders whose number and type can be adjusted according to the subject/area of research.
PAPER REVISED: 2020-03-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-03-20
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2021, VOLUME 25, ISSUE Issue 3, PAGES [1731 - 1742]
  1. ***, United Nations, Sustainable Energy Decade for All 2014-2024, 2014
  2. ***, Energy Access Outlook 2017, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2017
  3. ***, International Energy Outlook-IEO, U. S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, USA, 2016
  4. ***, Energy strategy of Kosovo* 2017-2026, Government of Kosovo* (in Serbian),, 2017
  5. ***, Municipal Energy Efficiency Plan 2016-2021 - MEEP (in Serbian), USAID, 2016
  6. Stojčetović, B., et al., The SWOT-AHP Method Application Determine Current Energy Situation and Define Strategies for Energy Security Improvement, Thermal Science, 23 (2018), 2B, pp. 861-872
  7. ***, Brochure - Renewable Energy, Ministry of Economic Development of Kosovo*( in Serbian),, 2018
  8. ***, Kosovo* - Regulatory Framework for RES - Procedures and Methodology for RES Electricity Pricing, Task 1 Report, Mercados Energy Markets International, 2009
  9. ***, Assessment of the Energy Potential of Biomass in Kosovo*, Ministry of Economic Development of Kosovo* (in Albanian), Priština, 2014
  10. Ervural, B. C., et al., An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT Analysis for Turkey's Energy Planning, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82 (2018), Part 1, pp. 1538-1550
  11. ***, Strategy of Development Energy Sector in Serbia until 2025 with Projections up to 2030. (in Serbian), Government of Republic of Serbia, 2015, Official gazette RS, No. 101/2015-36
  12. Kazem, Z., et al., A SWOT Framework for Analyzing the Electricity Supply Chain Using an Integrated AHP Methodology Combined with Fuzzy-TOPSIS, International Strategic Management Review, 3 (2015), 1-2, pp. 66-80
  13. Bas, E., The Integrated Framework for Analysis of Electricity Supply Chain Using an Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology Combined with AHP: The Case of Turkey, International Journal od Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 44 (2013), 1, pp. 897-907
  14. Terrados, J., et al., Regional Energy Planning through SWOT Analysis and Strategic Planning Tools, Impact on Renewables Development, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11 (2007), 6, pp. 1275-1287
  15. Stojčetović B., et al., Application of Integrated Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methodology to Renewable Energy Project Selection in Serbia, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8 (2016), 035906
  16. Djaković, D. D., et al., Multi-Criteria Analysis as a Support for National Energy Policy Regarding the Use of Biomass - Case Study of Serbia, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), 2, pp. 371-380
  17. Vujanović, D., et al., A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for the Vehicle Service Center Selection with the Aim to Increase the Vehicle Fleet Energy Efficiency, Thermal Science, 22 (2018), 3, pp. 1549-1561
  18. Stein, E. W., A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Model to Rank Electric Energy Production Technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 22 (2013), June, pp. 640-654
  19. Colak, M., Kaya I., Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives by Using an Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model: A Real Case Application for Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80 (2017), Dec., pp. 840-853
  20. Tasri, A., Susilawati, A., Selection Among Renewable Energy Alternatives Based on a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Indonesia, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 7 (2014), Sept., pp. 34-44
  21. Tikkanen, J., Maunumaki, A., CoPack Toolkit for Training Collaborative Planning, Trainers Guide, OULU University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland, 2012
  22. West, J., et al., Open Innovation: The Next Decade, Research Policy, 43 (2014), 5, pp. 805-811
  23. Moore, M. L., et al., Studying the Complexity of Change: Toward an Analytical Framework for Understanding Deliberate Social-Ecological Transformations, Ecology and Society, 19 (2014), 4, 54
  24. Olsson, P., et al., Social-Ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management: The Development of Adaptive co-Management of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden, Ecology and Society, 9 (2004), 4, 2
  25. Lund, H., et al., Smart Energy Systems and 4th Generation District Heating, Energy, 110 (2016), Sept., pp. 1-4
  26. Lund, H., et al., Chapter 6 - Analysis: Smart Energy Systems and Infrastructures, in: Renewable Energy Systems, 2nd ed., (Ed. H. Lund), Academic Press, 2014, New York, USA, pp. 131-184
  27. Haralambopoulos, D. A., Polatidis, H., Renewable Energy Projects: Structuring a Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Framework, Renewable Energy, 28 (2003), 6, pp. 961-973
  28. Saaty, T. L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pitsburgh, Penn., USA, 1996
  29. Živković, Ž., Nikolić, Đ., Osnove Matematičke Škole Strategijskog Menadžmenta, (in Serbian), (Basics of Mathematical School of Strategic Management), Tercija, Bor, Serbia, 2016
  30. Gorener, A., et al., Application of Combined SWOT and AHP: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58 (2012), Oct., pp. 1525-1534
  31. Suganthi, L., et al., Applications of Fuzzy Logic in Renewable Energy Systems - A Review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48 (2015), Aug., pp. 585-607
  32. Kaya, I., et al., A Comprehensive Review of Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodologies for Energy Policy Making, Energy Strategy Reviews, 24 (2019), Oct., pp. 207-228
  33. ***, Internal Report on Electricity Consumption (in Serbian), Kosovo* Electricity Distribution and Supply Company, Priština, Kosovo*, 2019
  34. ***, Internal Report - Lepenac River (in Albanian), Matkos Group, Priština, Kosovo*, 2016
  35. Ghorabaee, M. K., et al., A New Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) Method for Multicriteria Decision-Making, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50 (2016), 3, pp. 25-44

© 2022 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence