THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

POSSIBILITIES FOR AFFORDABLE, LOW ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT PASSIVE HOUSE IMPLEMENTATION IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

ABSTRACT
Sustainable housing is a worldwide challenge, while the case of Serbia could be an example of how complex the circumstances can be and how difficult it is to see the path towards sustainability. This paper sets out to answer multiple challenges; can energy-efficient, low-impact housing enter the market and respond to the needs of its population, potentially contributing to a more affordable and future-proof housing reality in Serbia? And does this demand rather different measure than the ones conventionally explored in innovative housing approaches else-where? To answer these questions, the paper starts from the preview of circumstances, then the methodology is proposed and explained, after which the possible building materials and technical installations for pilot multi-apartment Passive House are selected, and in the end, results are given and conclusions are drawn. Since the building is intended for a housing co-operative, both the affordability of the proposed solution and the environmental footprint has been comprehended by the methodology proposed. In the end, by carefully balancing the benefits of individual measures – favouring those that are cost-effective and discouraging the implementation of measures that are not, a viable pilot project that could step into the market-oriented society is selected.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2020-03-26
PAPER REVISED: 2020-06-25
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-07-10
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2020-08-08
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200326224K
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2021, VOLUME 25, ISSUE Issue 3, PAGES [1809 - 1825]
REFERENCES
  1. ***, United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
  2. Albert, P. C. Chan, Adabre, M. C., Bridging the Gap Between Sustainable Housing and Affordable Housing: The Required Critical Success Criteria (CSC), Building and Environment, 151 (2019), Mar., pp. 112-125
  3. Adabre, M. C., Albert, P. C. Chan, Critical Success Factors (Csfs) for Sustainable Affordable Housing, Building and Environment, 156 (2019), June, pp. 203-214
  4. Gan, X., et al., How Affordable Housing Becomes More Sustainable? A Stakeholder Study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 162 (2017), Sept., pp. 427-437
  5. Forde, J., et. al., Temporal Optimization for Affordable and Resilient Passivhaus Dwellings in the Social Housing Sector, Applied Energy, 261 (2020), Mar., 114383
  6. Chegut, A., et. al., Energy Efficiency and Economic Value in Affordable Housing, Energy Policy, 97 (2016), Oct., pp. 39-49
  7. Copiello, S., Achieving Affordable Housing through Energy Efficiency Strategy, Energy Policy, 85 (2015), Oct., pp. 288-298
  8. Khalid, R., Sunikka-Blank, M., Housing and Household Practices: Practice-Based Sustainability Interventions for Low-Energy Houses in Lahore, Pakistan, Energy for Sustainable Development, 54 (2020), Feb., pp. 148-163
  9. Heffernan, E., de Wilde, P., Group Self-Build Housing: A Bottom-Up Approach to Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Housing, Journal of Cleaner Production, 243 (2020), Jan., 118657
  10. Coimbra, J., Almeida, M., Challenges and Benefits of Building Sustainable Co-Operative Housing, Building and Environment, 62 (2013), Apr., pp. 9-17
  11. de Sylva, S., Taking Back Control: Issues and Benefits of Bottom-Up Redevelopment, Procedia Engineering, 212 (2018), pp. 348-355
  12. Dan, D., et al., Passive House Design: An Efficient Solution for Residential Buildings in Romania, Energy for Sustainable Development, 32 (2016), June, pp. 99-109
  13. Galvin, R., Are Passive Houses Economically Viable? A Reality-Based, Subjectivist Approach to Cost-Benefit Analyses, Energy and Buildings, 80 (2014), Sept., pp. 149-157
  14. Dalbem, R., et al., Optimisation of a Social Housing for South of Brazil: From Basic Performance Standard to Passive House Concept, Energy, 167 (2019), Jan., pp. 1278-1296
  15. Fokaides, P. A., et al., Performance of a Passive House Under Subtropical Climatic Conditions, Energy and Buildings, 133 (2016), Dec., pp. 14-31
  16. Alalouch, C., et al., Energy-Efficient House in the GCC Region, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216 (2016), Jan., pp. 736-743
  17. Badea, A., et al., A Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of the Passive House "POLITEHNICA" From Bucharest, Energy and Buildings, 80 (2014), Sept., pp. 542-555
  18. Djukic, A., et al., Achieving the Basic Sustainable Qualities in New Housing in Postsocialist Serbia: Regulation vs. Case-Studies, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 38 (2017), pp. 696-703
  19. Zeković, S., et al., The Credibility of Illegal and Informal Construction: Assessing Legalization Policies in Serbia, Cities, 97 (2020), Feb., 102548
  20. ***, EUROSTAT, Young People - Social Inclusion, ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Young_people_-_social_inclusion#Living_with_parents
  21. ***, EUROSTAT, People in the EU - Statistics on Housing Conditions, ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=People_in_the_EU_-_statistics_on_housing_conditions
  22. Lux, M., Sunega, P., The Future of Housing Systems After the Transition - The Case of the Czech Re-public, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43 (2010), June, pp. 22-231
  23. ***, EUROSTAT, Electricity Prices for Household Consumers - Bi-Annual Data (from 2007 onwards), appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/setupDownloads.do
  24. ***, Passive House Institute (PHI), Certified Buildings Map, database.passivehouse.com/buildings/map/
  25. Aydin, E., Brounen, D., The Impact of Policy on Residential Energy Consumption, Energy, 169 (2019), Feb., pp. 115-129
  26. ***, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Electricity Emission Factors Review, MWH S.p.A., Milano, 2009
  27. Brander, M., et al., Electricity-Specific Emission Factors for Grid Electricity, Ecometrica, (2011), Aug., pp. 1-22
  28. ***, European Investment Bank, EIB Project Carbon Footprint Methodologies, EIB, Luxemburg, 2018
  29. Rubinfield, A., The World Bank Group Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Management Plan, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2014
  30. ***, European Commission, Electricity Price Statistics, 2019. ec.europa.eu/eurostat/
  31. Freeman, R., 6 Estimates of Passive House Cost, 2017. robfreeman.com/6-estimates-passive-house-cost/
  32. ***, Turner & Townsend, "International Construction Market Survey 2019, 2019
  33. Badescu, V., et al., Modeling, Validation and Time-Dependent Simulation of the First Large Passive Building in Romania, Renewable Energy, 36 (2011), 1, pp. 142-157
  34. Namsone, E., et al., The Environmental Impacts of Foamed Concrete Production and Exploatation, Proceedings, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Riga, Latvia, Vol. 251, 2017
  35. Guardigli, L., Comparing the Environmental Impact of Reinforced Concrete and Wooden Structures, in: Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials, Woodhead Pub. L., Sawston, UK, 2014, pp. 407-433
  36. Guo, H., et al., A Comparison of the Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Performance Between Rein-forced Concrete and Cross-Laminated Timber Structures in Residential Buildings in the Severe Cold Region Of China, Sustainability, 9 (2017), 8, 1426
  37. Gan, V. J. L., et al., A Comprehensive Approach to Mitigation of Embodied Carbon in Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Journal of Cleaner Production, 229 (2019), Aug., pp. 582-597
  38. Sartori, I., Hestnes, A. G., Energy Use in the Life Cycle of Conventional and Low-Energy Buildings: A Review Article, Energy and Buildings, 39 (2006), 3, pp. 249-257
  39. ***, Government of Republic of Serbia, Energy Certification and Method of Expressing Building Ener-gy Performance, in Serbian, (Pravilnik o Uslovima, Sadržini i Načinu Izdavanja Sertifikata o Ener-getskim Svojstvima Zgrada - in Serbian), 2012
  40. Winther, T., et al., Like Having an Electric Car on the Roof: Domesticating PV Solar Panels in Norway, Energy for Sustainable Development, 47 (2018), Dec., pp. 84-93
  41. Nicholas, D., et al., Preparatory Study for Solar Photovoltaic Modules, Inverters and Systems - Task 1 Product Scope, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2018
  42. ***, European Comission, Photovoltaic geographical information system, re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/tools.html
  43. Obrecht, T. P., et al., Influence of the Orientation on the Optimal Glazing Size for Passive Houses in Different European Climates (for Non-Cardinal Directions), Solar Energy, 189 (2019), Sept., pp. 15-25

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence