International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links


The object of this research work is the comparison of the annual primary energy consumption of different types of heating systems, using two different calculation methods. The TRNSYS 18 software makes use of dynamic simulation, while the WinWatt software calculates according to the Hungarian implementation of EPBD (Decree No. 7/2006). There were differences in results which could be caused by the more precise calculation of the TRNSYS software. Differences were shown also in the weather data used by the two computer tools that had one of the most important effects on the results according this investigation. The number of heating degree days used by TRNSYS is 10% less, than that the Hungarian decree provides. Using the yearly measured energy consumption data given by the inhabitant of the investigated family house, the validation of the developed dynamic building energy simulation model by TRNSYS could be also achieved with good agreement.
PAPER REVISED: 2019-01-29
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2019-02-12
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2020, VOLUME 24, ISSUE Issue 2, PAGES [893 - 902]
  1. 7/2006 (V. 24). 2016. Degree of Minister Without Portfolio About Determination of Energy Efficiency of Buildings. Available at:, (2018).
  2. Jozsef, N., et al., Investment-savings method for energy-economic optimization of external wall thermal insulation thickness, Energy and Buildings, 86 (2014), pp. 268-274.
  3. Seyed, A. G., et al., Heat Transfer Enhancement and Pressure Drop for Fin-and-Tube Compact Heat exchangers with Delta Winglet-Type Vortex Generators, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 16 (2018), 2, pp. 233 - 247
  4. Hossein, J., et al., A Comprehensive Review of Backfill Materials and Their Effects on Ground Heat Exchanger Performance, Sustainability, 10 (2018), 12, pp. 1-22
  5. Harmati, N., et al., Energy Performance Modelling and Heat Recovery Unit Efficiency Assessment of an Office Building, Thermal Science, 19 (2015), pp. 865-880
  6. Csoknyai, T., et al., Building stock characteristics and energy performance of residential buildings in Eastern-European countries, Energy and Buildings, 132 (2016), pp. 39-52
  7. Amir, A.S., et al., Performance of two-stage variable capacity air source heat pump: Field performance results and TRNSYS simulation, Energy and Buildings, 94 (2015), pp. 80-90
  8. Félix, R.C., et al., Development and Experimental Validation of a TRNSYS Dynamic Tool for Design and Energy Optimization of Ground Source Heat Pump Systems, Energies, 10 (2017), pp. 1510
  9. Buonomano, A., et al., A dynamic model of an innovative high-temperature solar heating and cooling system, Thermal Science, 20 (2015), pp. 1121-1133
  10. Turanjanin, V.M., et al., Different heating systems for single family house: Energy and economic analysis, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), pp. 309-320
  11. Anh-Tuan, N., et al., A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis, Applied Energy, 113 (2014), pp. 1043-1058
  12. Sébastien, T., et al., Numerical simulation and performance assessment of an absorption solar air-conditioning system coupled with an office building, Building Simulation, 5 (2012), pp. 243-255
  13. Paul, B., et al., Modelling and simulation of a heat pump for simultaneous heating and cooling, Building Simulation, 5 (2012), pp. 219-232
  14. Muhammad, W.A., et al., Computational intelligence techniques for HVAC systems: A review, Building Simulation, 9 (2016), pp. 359-398
  15. TRNSYS Tutorials (2017).

© 2022 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence