THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links

Kadir Mersin

,

Irşad Bayirhan

,

Cem Gazioğlu

REVIEW OF CO2 EMISSION AND REDUCING METHODS IN MARITIME TRANSPORTATION

ABSTRACT
Despite the lowest CO2 emission in terms of payload per unit mile, commercial marine fleet transport is responsible for approximately 1 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions per year and total global carbon dioxide. 2.7% emission. To keep the world's surface temperature below critical + 2°C, IMO works with alternative methods on a ton / mile basis to reduce existing CO2 emissions. In this study, these methods are analyzed and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The future of CO2 emissions was also investigated
KEYWORDS
ship emissions, beaufort scale, CO2Emission
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2019-07-22
PAPER REVISED: 2019-09-07
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2019-09-10
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2019-10-06
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI190722372M
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2019, VOLUME 23, ISSUE Supplement 6, PAGES [S2073 - S2079]
REFERENCES
  1. IMO, "WMD World Maritime Day 2009, Climate change: A challenge for IMO too!," International Maritime Organization, vol. Background, no. 3, London, pp. 21-25, 2009.
  2. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, K. Averyt, and M. Marquis, Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, vol. 4. Cambridge university press, 2007.
  3. N. M. Allen, M.R., O.P. Dube, W. Solecki, F. Aragón-Durand, W. Cramer, S. Humphreys, M. Kainuma, J. Kala and and K. Z. Y. Mulugetta, R. Perez, M. Wairiu, "Framing and Context. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming," in IPCC, 1st ed., P. R. S. Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, E. L. A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, and and T. W. T. Maycock, M. Tignor, Eds. Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018, pp. 51-83.
  4. ICS, "Shipping, World Trade and the Reduction of CO2 Emissions," in COP 18 DOHA 7 December 2012, 2012, pp. 1-6.
  5. IMO MEPC 59/4, "Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships - Second IMO GHG Study 2009," London, 2009.
  6. M. S. Eide and Ø. Endresen, "Assessment of measures to reduce future CO2 emissions from shipping," Res. Innov., 2010.
  7. IMO MEPC 63/23/10, "2012 Guidelines On Survey and Certificaiton Of The Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)," London, 2012.
  8. Ø. Endresen et al., "Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact," J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 108, no. D17, 2003.
  9. A. A. Talay, C. Deniz, and Y. Durmuşoğlu, "Analysis of Effects of Methods Applied to Increase the Efficiency on Ships for Reducing CO2 Emissions," J ETA Marit. Sci, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61-74, 2014.
  10. T. Chu Van, J. Ramirez, T. Rainey, Z. Ristovski, and R. J. Brown, "Global impacts of recent IMO regulations on marine fuel oil refining processes and ship emissions," Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., vol. 70, no. April, pp. 123-134, 2019.
  11. World Shipping Council, "Liner Shipping And Carbon Emissions Policy," 2009.
  12. T. Colman and P. Paster, "Red, white and'green': the cost of carbon in the global wine trade," 2007.
  13. IMO, "IMO World Maritime Day, IMO's Response To Current Environmental Challanges," London, 2007.
  14. Ø. Buhaug et al., "Updated study on greenhouse gas emissions from ships: phase I report," Int. Marit. Organ. London, UK, vol. 1, 2008.
  15. Ø. Buhaug et al., "Second imo ghg study 2009," Int. Marit. Organ. London, UK, vol. 20, 2009.
  16. IMO MEPC 61/5/16, "Reduction Of GHG Emissions From Ships, Further Details On The United States Proposal To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From International Shipping," London, 2010.
  17. IMO MEPC.1 / Circ.681, "Interim Guıdelines On The Method Of Calculation Of The Energy Efficiency Design Index For New Ships," London, 2009.
  18. R. L. Townsin and Y. J. Kwon, "Approximate formulae for the speed loss due to added resistance in wind and waves," 1983.
  19. M. R. Haddara and C. G. Soares, "Wind loads on marine structures," Mar. Struct., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 199-209, 1999.
  20. K. J. Rawson, Basic ship theory, vol. 1. Elsevier, 2001.
  21. J. Faber, M. Freund, M. Köpke, and D. Nelissen, "Going Slow to Reduce Emissions: can the current surplus of maritime transport capacity be turned into an opportunity to reduce GHG emissions?," Seas Risk, 2010.
  22. IMO MEPC, "MEPC 59 activities on control of GHG emissions from ships Engaged In International Trade," in The Conference Of The Parties Serving As The Meeting Of The Parties To The Kyoto Protocol 7-18 December 2009, Second IMO GHG Study 2009, 2009.
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Review of CO2 emission and reducing methods in maritime transportation

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence