International Scientific Journal


Biogas represents a promising source for the production of clean energy. The objective of this paper was to quantify the potential for the reduction of emissions to the environment during the production of electricity from biogas in comparison with environmental effects of the production of the same amount of electricity from fossil resources (coal from Kolubara basin and natural gas). Basis for comparison of environmental impacts in this work was the annual production of electricity in biogas plants of the total capacity of 80 MW. This study has shown that the annual production of electricity from biogas power plants of 80 MW results in: substitution of up to 840 kt of coal from Kolubara basin and 123.2 million m3 of natural gas; reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases in the range of 491.16 kt - 604.97 kt CO2-eq, depending on the energy efficiency of the process of electricity production from biogas; reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases up to 92.37 kt CO2-eq compared to the use of natural gas for electricity generation.
PAPER REVISED: 2015-11-10
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2015-11-15
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2016, VOLUME 20, ISSUE Issue 4, PAGES [1333 - 1344]
  1. Second Environmental Performance Review for Republic of Serbia, Unece, 2007, available at the website, last access 24.10.2015.
  2. National program of environment protection up to 2020(In Serbian), available at the website, last access 24.10.2015.
  3. First (Initial) National Communication of the Republic of Serbia under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changes, published by Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, November 2010, Belgrade
  4. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources
  5. Report on the environmental situation in the Republic of Serbia for 2012 year (in Serbian), Serbian Environment Protection Agency, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia; 2013, available at the website, last access 22.10.2015.
  6. Regulation on requirements for obtaining the status of the privileged electric power producer(in Serbian), Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No.8/13;2013, available at the website, last access 21.10.2015.
  7. Regulation on incentive measures for the production of electricity by using renewable energy sources andcombined heat and power(in Serbian),,Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No.8/13;2013, available at website, last access 20.10.2015.
  8. Serbian National Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP) up to 2020(in Serbian), Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No.53/13;2013, available at the website, last access 20.10.2015.
  9. Cvetković, S., at al., Potentials and status of biogas as energy source in the Republic of Serbia., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31(2014), pp. 407-416
  10. Strategy of Energy Development in the Republic of Serbia until 2025 with projections up to 2030, available at the website, last access 19.10.2015
  11. Liebetrau, J.,at al., Methane emissions from biogas-producing facilities within the agricultural sector, Engineering in Life Sciences, 6 (2010), pp. 595-599
  12. Capponi, S.,at al., CO2 savings affect the break-even distance of feedstock supply and digestate placement in biogas production, Renewable Energy, 37(2012), pp. 45-52
  13. Laramee, J. , Davis J., Economic and environmental impacts of domestic bio-digesters: Evidence from Arusha Tanzania, Energy for Sustainable Development , 17(2013), pp. 296-304
  14. Pucker, J.,at al.,Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates -implications for greenhouse gas emissions, Animal,7(2013), pp.283-291
  15. Brynolf, S., at al., Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol, Journal of Cleaner Production, 74 (2014), pp. 86-95
  16. Akhgari, P.A., Kamalan, H.,Economical - environmental evaluation of natural gas and renewable energy systems, International Journal of Energy Research, 37(2013), pp.1550-1561
  17. Cuélar, A.D., Webber, M.E.,Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas, Environmental Research Letters, 3(2008), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034002
  18. Scholz, al., Greenhouse gas mitigation potential and mitigation costs of biogas production in Brandenburg Germany, AgBioForum, 14(2011), pp.133-141
  19. Kaparaju P., Rintala, J., Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland, Renewable Energy, 36(2011), pp. 31-41
  20. Aurich, M.A., at al., Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources, Renewable Energy, 37(2012),pp. 277-284
  21. Bachmaier , J., at al., Greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in agriculture, Engineering in Life Sciences, 6(2010), pp.560-569
  22. Aspect of climate change on development of the energy sector in Serbia, IPA EU SuDES project, Belgrade, 2012.
  23. V. Milisavljevći, V. Čokorilo , D. Zlatanović , J. Milenković. Consumption of coal in Serbia and CO2 emissions related to it's combustion. 14. Simpozijum Termičara Srbije, 13 - 16. oktobar 2009, Sokobanja.
  24. Efficiency in Electricity Generation,EURELECTRIC, July 2003. available at the website, last access 17.10.2015.
  25. Mancarella, P. and Chicco, C., Assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions from cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Part II: Analysis techniques and application cases, Energy, 33(2008), pp. 418-430
  26. Natural gas, Fuel Chemistry Division, Public Education and Outreach. available at website , last access 21.10.2015.
  27. Martinov M, Kovacs K, Đatkov Đ. Biogas technology, Faculty of Technical Science, Novi Sad; 2012.
  28. Lantz, M., The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produce from manure in Sweden - A comparison of different CHP technologies, Applied Energy, 98(2012), pp. 502-511
  29. EPA Combined Heat and Power Partnership, Biomass CHP Catalogue of Technologies, EPA, 2007.
  30. Somehsaraei, H.N., at al., Performance analysis of a biogas-fueled micro gas turbine using a validated thermodynamic model, Applied Thermal Engineering , 66(2014), pp. 181-190.
  31. Trogisch, S., at al., Operation of molten carbonate fuel cells with different biogas sources: a challenging approach for field trials, Journal of Power Sources , 145(2005), pp. 632-8.
  32. Trendewicz, A., and Braun, R.J., Techno-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell based combined heat and power systems for biogas utilization at waste water treatment facilities; Journal of Power Sources, 233(2013), pp. 380-393
  33. Road Map for Europe, AEBIOM , 2007, available at the website, last access 18.10.2015.
  34. Hennig, C. , Gawor M., Bioenergy production and use: Comparative analysis of the economic and environmental effects, Energy Conversion and Management, 63(2012), pp.130-137
  35. Liebetrau, J., Methane emissions from biogas-producing facilities within the agricultural sector. Engineering in Life Sciences, 6(2010), pp. 595-599
  36. Spielman M,Dinkel F, Schleiss K. 2007. Lifecycle Inventories of Bioenergy Report Number 17.Swiss Centre for Lifecycle Inventories, Dubendorf
  37. Berglund ,M., Borjesson, P., Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production, Biomass and Bioenergy, 30(2006), pp. 254-266
  38. Erić M, Marković Z, Spasojević V, Stefanović P, Cvetinović D, Škobalj P. Carbon Dioxide Emission From Thermal Power Plant Nikola Tesla A, International Conference On Power Plants, Power Plants 2012, 1303-1312
  40. Jovanovic, V.V. and Komatina, M.S., NOx and SO2 emission factors for serbian lignite Kolubara. Thermal Science, 16(2012), pp. 1213-1228
  41. Green book of Elektroprivreda Srbije. Belgrade 2009
  42. EPA−emission factor documentation for ap-42 section 1.4 natural gas combustion, available at the website
  43. Lectures (in Serbian), Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, available at the website, last access 16.10.2015.
  44. Frankiewicz ,T., Summary and Status of NAMAs in Solid Waste Sector, Global Methane Initiative, Florianopolis, Brazil, 13 March 2014.
  45. Biogas Renewable Energy, Information website on biogas. available at the website, last access 24.10.2015.
  46. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2006, available at the website, last access 24.10.2015
  47. Biomass for Heat and Power, IEA ETSAP - Technology Brief E05 - May 2010 available at the website , last access 24.10.2015

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence