International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Computation of monthly runoff coefficients for Istanbul (Turkey)

Water demand for Istanbul is supplied both by impounded reservoirs located within its provincial boundaries and by water transfer from Western and Eastern regions in peripheral areas, located in South-West Black Sea region. The runoff coefficient defined as the ratio of the streamflow to the precipitation, plays a key role in the calculation of the surface water yield of water catchment areas. In this paper, we present the computation of monthly runoff coefficients for an accurate estimation of the yield of the catchment areas. We obtain statistical parameters for monthly temperatures and precipitation, based on 105-year data recorded at Istanbul Kandilli Observatory, modeled as Gaussian and Rayleigh distributed random variables, respectively. We run simulations to predict temperatures and precipitation over a horizon extending to 2100. We apply Turc's formula and Thornthwaite method to obtain monthly runoff coefficients based on long-term data. The results are compared and discussed with the findings of previous researches
PAPER REVISED: 2020-03-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-03-04
  1. Ezber, Y., et al., Climatic Effects of Urbanization in Istanbul: A Statistical and Modeling Analysis, Int J Climatol., 27(2007), 5, pp. 667-679. doi: 10.1002/joc.1420
  2. Burak, S., et al., A network model simulation proposal for river basin management plans (RBMPs) in Turkey.Proceedings, 10th World Congr. on Water Resources and Environment. "Panta Rhei", Athens, Greece, 2017, Vol. 57, p. 231-236.
  3. Toros, H., et al., Long-Term Variations of Temperature And Precipitation in The Megacity Of Istanbul for the Development of Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change, Adv Meteorol., 2017(2017), pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1155/2017/6519856
  4. IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer), IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  5. Trigo R.M., et al., The Record Winter Drought of 2011-12 in the Iberian Peninsula, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94(2013),9, pp. 41-45.
  6. Miller J.D., et al., Assessing the Impact of Urbanization on Storm Runoff in A Peri-Urban Catchment Using Historical Change in Impervious Cover, J Hydrol., 515(2014), pp. 59-70.
  7. Turoğlu, H., Detection of Changes on Temperature and Precipitation Features in Istanbul (Turkey), Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 2014(2014), pp. 549-562.
  8. UNEP/MAP, Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development-MSSD 2016-2025, Valbonne, Plan Bleu, Regional Activity Centre, 2016.
  9. BOUN-KOERI (The Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute). Temperature and Precipitation Data,
  10. Turc, L., Calculation of water balance assessment according to rainfall and temperature, IAHS Publ, 37 (1954), pp. 188-200 (in French)
  11. Thornthwaite, C.W., et al., Instructions and Tables for Computing Potential Evapotranspiration and Water Balance, 1957.
  12. Kadioglu, M., Şen, Z., Monthly Precipitation-Runoff Polygons and Mean Runoff Coefficients. Hydrol Sci J, 46(2001),1, 3-11. doi:10.1080/02626660109492796
  13. Jones, P.D., Hulme, M., Calculating Regional Climatic Time Series for Temperature and Precipitation: Methods and Illustrations, Int J Climatol., 16(1996), 361-77.<361::AID-JOC53>3.0.CO;2-F.
  14. Turkes, M., Observed and Predicted Climate Change, Drought and Desertification in Turkey, Journal of Environmental Sciences of Ankara University, 4(2012), 1-32. (in Turkish)
  15. Turkes M., et al., Impacts of Climate Change on Precipitation Climatology and Variability in Turkey, In Water Resources of Turkey, World Water Resources, (Eds. N. Harmancioglu, D. Altinbilek D.), Cham, Springer, 2020, pp. 467-491. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11729-0_14
  16. Svensson, C., et al., Statistical Distributions for Monthly Aggregations of Precipitation and Streamflow in Drought Indicator Applications. Water Resour Res., 53(2017), pp. 999-1018. doi:10.1002/2016WR019276
  17. Gudulas, K., et al.,Comparison of Different Methods to Estimate Actual Evapotranspiration and Hydrologic Balance. Desalin Water Treat.,51(2013), 2945-54. doi:10.1080/19443994.2012.748443
  18. Küçük, İ., An Evaluation on Hydroelectric Potential of Turkey, Proceedings, UCTEA 1st Energy Symposium, Turkey, 1996, 12-14. (in Turkish)
  19. Yiğitbaşıoğlu, H., The Dams in Turkey, Journal of Ankara University Research Center of Turkish Geography, 5 (1996), pp.171-181. (in Turkish)
  20. Bayazıt, M., Hydrology, Rectorate of Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 1999.
  21. Jacobson, C.R., Identification and Quantification of the Hydrological Impacts of Imperviousness in Urban Catchments: A review. J Environ Manage., 92(2011), 6, pp. 1438-1448. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.018.
  22. Raymond, F., et al., Extreme Dry Spell Detection and Climatology Over the Mediterranean Basin during the wet season. Geophys Res Lett., 43(2016), 13, 7196-7204. doi:10.1002/2016GL069758.
  23. Koleva, E., Alexandrov, V., Drought in the Bulgarian Low Regions During the 20th Century, Theor Appl Climatol., 92 (2008), pp. 113-120. doi: 10.1007/s00704-007-0297-1
  24. Croitoru, A.E., et al., Dry Spells on the Romanian Black Sea Coast. Proceedings, Air Water Components Environ. Conf. Cluj, Romania, Vol. 3, 2012.
  25. IPCC., Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (Eds. T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.