International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Development and prioritization of renewable energy scenarios using strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threat analysis and fuzzy analytical network process methodology

The main goal of this paper is to develop and prioritize renewable energy scenarios for electricity production. The model proposed in the paper was applied on the example of the municipality of Štrpce, enclave in south Kosovo
PAPER REVISED: 2020-03-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-03-20
  1. United Nations, "Sustainable energy decade for all 2014-2024," 2014.
  2. Energy access outlook 2017, International energy agency, Paris, 2017.
  3. International energy outlook-IEO, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, USA, 2016.
  4. ***, Energy strategy of Kosovo* 2017-2026, Government of Kosovo*, 2017,
  5. Municipal Energy Efficiency Plan 2016-2021 - MEEP (in Serbian language), USAID, 2016.
  6. Stojčetović, B., et al., SWOT-AHP method application to determine current energy situation and define strategies for energy security improvement, Thermal science, 23, (2018), 2B, pp. 861-872.
  7. ***, Brochure - Renewable Energy, Ministry of Economic Development of Kosovo*(in Serbian language), 2018,
  8. Kosovo* - Regulatory Framework for RES - Procedures and Methodology for RES Electricity Pricing, Task 1 Report, Mercados Energy Markets International, 2009.
  9. Assessment of the energy potential of biomass in Kosovo*, Ministry of Economic Development of Kosovo* (in Albanian language), Priština, 2014.
  10. Ervural, B.C., et al., An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, (2018), pp. 1538-1550.
  11. Strategy of development energy sector in R. Serbia until 2025. with projections up to 2030. (in Serbian language), Government of Republic of Serbia, 2015, Official gazette RS, no. 101/2015-36.
  12. Kazem, Z., et al., A SWOT framework for analyzing the electricity supply chain using an integrated AHP methodology combined with fuzzy-TOPSIS. International strategic management review, 3, (2015), 1-2, pp. 66-80.
  13. Bas, E., The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: the case of Turkey. International journal od electrical power & energy systems, 44, (2013), 1, pp. 897-907.
  14. Terrados, J., et al., Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools. Impact on renewables development. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 11, (2007), 6, pp. 1275-1287.
  15. Stojčetović B., et al., Application of integrated strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats and analytic hierarchy process methodology to renewable energy project selection in Serbia, Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 8, (2016), 035906.
  16. Djaković, D.D., et al., Multi-Criteria Analysis as a support for national energy policy regarding the use of biomass - Case study of Serbia, Thermal Science, 20(2), (2016), pp. 371-380.
  17. Vujanović, D., et al., A hybrid multi-criteria decision making model for the vehicle service center selection with the aim to increase the vehicle fleet energy efficiency. Thermal science, 22, (2018), pp. 1549-1561.
  18. Stein, EW., A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy review, 22, (2013), pp. 640-654.
  19. Çolak, M., Kaya I., Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 80, (2017), pp. 840-853.
  20. Tasri, A., Susilawati, A., Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Indonesia, Sustainable energy technologies and assessments, 7, (2014), pp. 34-44.
  21. Tikkanen, J., Maunumaki, A., CoPack Toolkit for training collaborative planning, Trainers guide, OULU university of applied sciences, 2012.
  22. West, J., et al., Open innovation: the next decade. Research policy, 43, (2014), 5, pp. 805-811.
  23. Moore, M.L., et al., Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations, Ecology and society, 19, (2014), 4, 54.
  24. Olsson, P., et al., Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden, Ecology and society 9(2004). (4): 2.
  25. Lund, H., et al., Smart energy systems and 4th generation district heating. Energy, 110 (2016), pp. 1-4.
  26. Lund, H., et al., Chapter 6 - Analysis: Smart Energy Systems and Infrastructures, In: Renewable Energy Systems (Second Edition), (Ed. H. Lund), Academic Press, (2014), pp. 131-184.
  27. Haralambopoulos, D. A., Polatidis, H. Renewable energy projects: structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework. Renewable energy, 28 (2003), 6, pp. 961-973.
  28. Saaty, T.L., Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pitsburgh, USA, 1996.
  29. Živković, Ž., Nikolić Đ., Osnove matematičke škole strategijskog menadžmenta, in Serbian language, (Basics of mathematical school of strategic management), Tercija, Bor, Serbia, 2016.
  30. Gorener, A., et al., Application of combined SWOT and AHP: A case study for a manufacturing firm, Procedia - social and behavioral sciences. 58 (2012), pp. 1525-1534.
  31. Suganthi, L., et al., Applications of fuzzy logic in renewable energy systems - A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 48 (2015), pp. 585-607.
  32. Kaya, İ., et al., A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making, Energy Strategy Reviews, 24 (2019), pp. 207-228.
  33. Internal report on electricity consumption (in Serbian language), Kosovo* Electricity Distribution and Supply Company, Priština, Kosovo*, 2019.
  34. Internal report - Lepenac river (in Albanian language), Matkos group, Priština, Kosovo*, 2016.
  35. Ghorabaee, M. K. et al., A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multicriteria decision-making, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50 (2016), 3, pp. 25-44.