International Scientific Journal


Sharkskin-inspired riblets are widely adopted as a passive method for drag reduc¬tion of flow over surfaces. In this research, large eddy simulation of turbulent flow over riblet-structured surface in a rectangular channel domain were performed at various Reynolds numbers, ranging from 4200-10000, to probe the resultant drag change, compared to smooth surface. The changes of mean streamwise velocity gradient in wall-normal direction at varied locations around riblet structures were also investigated to reduce mechanisms of streamlined riblet in reducing drag. The computational model is validated by comparing the simulation results against analytical and experimental data, for both smooth and riblet surfaces. Results in¬dicating that the performance of the proposed streamlined riblet shows 7% drag reduction, as maximum, which is higher than the performance of L-shaped riblet with higher wetted surface area. The mean velocity profile analysis indicates that the streamlined riblet structures help to reduce longitudinal averaged velocity component rate in the normal to surface direction of near-wall region which leads to laminarization process as fluid-flows over riblet structures.
PAPER REVISED: 2019-11-25
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-01-27
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
  1. Toms, B. A., Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers, in Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Rheology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1948. vol. 2, pp. 135-141
  2. Robinson, S. K., A Review of Vortex Structures and Associated Coherent Motions in Turbulent Boundary Layers. In: Gyr A. (eds) Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction. International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1990, pp. 23-50,
  3. Moin, P., Analysis of turbulence data generated by numerical simulations, 25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1987, Reno, NV, U.S.A.,
  4. Smith, C. R. et al., Hairpin Vortices in Turbulent Boundary Layers: The Implications for Reducing Surface Drag, in Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction, IUTAM Symposium Zurich/Switzerland ,1990, pp. 51-58,
  5. Goldstein, D. et al. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a modeled riblet covered surface, J. Fluid Mech. 302 (1995), pp. 333-376,
  6. Dean, B., Bhushan, B., Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 368, no. 1929, October 2010, pp. 4775-4806,
  7. Liu, K. N., et al., Drag reduction in pipes lined with riblets. AIAA J., vol. 28 (1990), 10, pp 545-551,
  8. Chu D. C., Karniadakis, G. E., A direct numerical simulation of laminar and turbulent flow over riblet-mounted surfaces, J. Fluid Mech., 250 (1993), 1
  9. Jung, Y. C., Bhushan, B., Biomimetic structures for fluid drag reduction in laminar and turbulent flows, J. Phys. Condens. Matter Inst. Phys. J., 22, (2010), 3, p. 035104,
  10. Walsh, M. J., Weinstein, L. M., Drag and heat transfer on surfaces with small longitudinal fins, in 11th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, July 10-12, 1978,
  11. Walsh, M. J., Drag characteristics of V-groove and transverse curvature riblets, Viscose Drag Reduction, AIAA, pp. 168-184, 1980,
  12. Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin, Exp. Fluids, 28 (2000), 5, pp. 403-412,
  13. Martin S., Bhushan, B., Fluid flow analysis of continuous and segmented riblet structures, RSC Adv., 6 (2016), 13, pp. 10962-10978,
  14. Bokhorst, E. V., et al., Feather roughness reduces flow separation during low Reynolds number glides of swifts, J. Exp. Biol., 218 (2015), 20, pp. 3179-3191,
  15. Stankovic et al., Specific Aspects of Turbulent Flow in Rectangular Ducts. Thermal Science, 21 (2017), 3, pp. S663-S678,
  16. Smagorinsky, J., General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 91 (1963), p. 99,<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2
  17. Lilly, D. K., A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid‐scale closure method, Phys. Fluids Fluid Dyn., 4 (1992) 3, pp. 633-635,
  18. Patel V. C, Head, M. R., Some observations on skin friction and velocity profiles in fully developed pipe and channel flows, J. Fluid Mech., 38 (1969), 1, pp. 181-201,
  19. Jiménez J., Moin, P., The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 225 (1991), pp. 213-240,
  20. Choi, H., et al., Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets, J. Fluid Mech., 255 (1993), pp. 503-539,
  21. Russo F., Basse, N. T., Scaling of turbulence intensity for low-speed flow in smooth pipes, Flow Meas. Instrum., 52 (2016), pp. 101-114,
  22. S. Martin S., Bhushan, B., Fluid flow analysis of a shark-inspired microstructure, J. Fluid Mech., 756 (2014), pp. 5-29,
  23. Reichardt, H., Vollständige Darstellung der turbulenten Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in glatten Leitungen, ZAMM - J. Appl. Math. Mech. Z. Für Angew. Math. Mech., 31 (1951), 7, pp. 208-219
  24. Bechert, D., et al., Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry, J. Fluid Mech., 338 (1997), pp. 59-87,
  25. Lee S.-J., Jang Y.-G., Control of flow around a NACA 0012 airfoil with a micro-riblet film, J. Fluids Struct., 20 (2005), 5, pp. 659-672,
  26. Krieger, V., et al., Toward design of the antiturbulence surface exhibiting maximum drag reduction effect, J. Fluid Mech., 850 (2018), pp. 262-303,

© 2020 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence