International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links


Because it is a newer and unproven technique, ionospheric seismology is still accepted as a phenomenon by a lot of scientists. However, research in this subject is rapidly increasing in the last decade. According to the ionospheric seismology, the mechanical energy accumulated by the compression of the rocks before the big earthquakes is released from the ground by creating a positive hall. These processes at the ground-to-air interface can lead to the injection of massive amounts of air ions into the lower atmosphere.” [1]. As a result of the injection, the earthquake lights, temperature rising, the pressure in the troposphere, radio frequencies distortions and Total Electron Content perturbation in ionosphere occur. Therefore, even if it doesn't enough alone, this parameter can be contributing to earthquake predict. It has been supported with several instances of manuscript. In this study, ionospheric Total Electron Content was calculated for each station and satellite using Global Positioning System stations data in California for three last earthquakes. The earthquakes are named Hector Mine-1999, Baja-2009 and Napa-2014, and their magnitudes are 7.1, 7.2, and 6 respectively. After the processes, quite significant outcomes have been obtained.
PAPER REVISED: 2018-11-20
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2018-11-25
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2019, VOLUME 23, ISSUE Supplement 1, PAGES [S167 - S174]
  1. Freund F, Pilorz S (2012), Electric Currents in the Earth Crust and the Generation of Pre-Earthquake ULF Signals. The Frontier of Earthquake Prediction Studies. Nihon Senmontosho Publ. p. 468-508 (2012).
  2. NOAA, Space Weather and GPS Systems,
  3. Calais E and Minster J B (1995). GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following the January 1994, Northridge earthquake, Geophysics Res. Lett., 22, 1045-1048.
  4. Jovan B. BAJ^ETI], Aleksandra M. NINA , Vladimir M. ^ADEı , and Branislav M. TODOROVI] Ionospheric D-Region Temperatures Relaxation and Its Influences On Radio Signal Propagation After Solar X-Flares Occurrence, THERMAL SCIENCE: Year 2015, Vol. 19, Suppl. 2, pp. S299-S309. DOI: 10.2298/TSCI141223084B
  5. Zhang Xuedong, Kang Chunli, Ma Weiyu, Ren Jing, Wang Yong, 2018 Study on Thermal anomalies of earthquake process by using tidal-force and outgoing-longwave-radiation, 768 THERMAL SCIENCE: Year 2018, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 767 -776 DOI: 10.2298/TSCI161229153Z
  6. Heki K, (2011) Ionospheric Electron Enhancement Preceding the 2011 Thoku-Oki Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, L17312, 2011. doi:10.1029/2011GL047908.
  7. Pulinets S, Davidenko D (2013) Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes and Global Electric Circuit, Advances in Space Research, Elsevier, Accepted 25 December 2013.
  8. Urusan A U (2014), Relations between the GNSS, InSAR, and the other techniques for prediction of earthquakes Arabian Journal of Geosciences, ISSN 1866-7511, doi: 10.1007/s12517-014-1670-x.
  9. Ducic V, Artru J, Lognonné P (2003) Ionospheric remote sensing of the Denali Earthquake Rayleigh surface wave. Article first published online. doi: 10.1029/2003GL017812.
  10. Bleier T, Dunson C, Maniscalco M, Bryant N, Bambery R, and Freund F (2009). Investigation of ULF magnetic pulsations, air conductivity changes, infrared signatures associated with the 30 October 2007 Alum Rock M5.4 earthquake. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9:585-603, 2009.
  11. Fraser-Smith A C (2008), Ultralow-Frequency Magnetic Fields Preceding Large Earthquakes. Eos, 89:211, 2008.
  12. Heraud J, Centa V A, Bleier T, and Dunson C. Determining future epicenters by triangulation of magnetometer pulses in Peru. AGU Fall Meeting, section NH014, 2013.
  13. Bortnik J, Bleier T E, Dunson C, Freund F (2010), Estimating the seismotelluric current required for observable electromagnetic ground signals. Ann. Geophysics, 28:1615-1624, 2010.
  14. NOAA-1, Planetary K Indices,
  15. NOAA-2, Station K and A indices,
  16. Bartels J, Heck N H & Johnston, HF. (1939). The three-hour range index measuring geomagnetic activity. Geophysical Research, 44, 411-454.
  17. Afraimovich E L, Astafieva E I, Gokhberg M B, Lapshin V M, Permyakova V E, Steblov G M, and Shalimov S L (2004), Variations of the total electron content in the ionosphere from GPS data recorded during the Hector Mine earthquake of October 16, 1999, California, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 6, 339-354, doi:10.2205/2004ES000155.
  18. Thomas J N, Love J J, Komjathy A, Verkhoglyadova O P, Butala M, and Rivera N (2012), On the reported ionospheric precursor of the 1999 Hector Mine, California earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06302, doi:10.1029/2012GL051022.
  19. Pulinets S A, Kotsarenko A N, Ciraolo L, Pulinets I A (2007). Special case of ionospheric day-to-day variability associated with earthquake preparation, Elsevier, Science Direct, Advances in
  20. Su Y C, Liu J Y, Chen S P, Tsai H F, Chen M Q (2013), Temporal and spatial precursors in ionospheric total electron content of the 16 October 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 118, 6511-6517, Received 28 May 2013; revised 5 September 2013; accepted 20 September 2013; published 3 October 2013. doi:10.1002/jgra.50586, 2013.
  21. Wiemer S, Gerstenberger M, and Hauksson E (2002). Properties of the Aftershock Sequence of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake: Implications for Aftershock Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 92, No. 4, pp. 1227-1240.
  22. CALTECH, Significant Earthquakes and Faults,
  23. Scoville J, Heraud J, Freund F (2014), Pre-earthquake magnetic pulses, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2, 7367-7381, 2014, doi:10.5194/nhessd-2-7367-2014.

© 2020 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence