International Scientific Journal


In this paper, the thermodynamic and economic efficiency of three different heat supply processes are compared, based on exergy flows and costs of heat. A gas turbine process with a heat recovery boiler, a gas and steam turbine combined cycle process and a high temperature heat pump system recovering waste heat are analysed. The aim is to provide heat as 4 bar(abs) saturated steam. The economic analysis bases on the comparison of the consumption-related costs of heat, the capital-related costs of heat, and the operation-related costs of heat. The results show that the heat pump system has higher exergetic efficiency than the gas turbine or the gas turbine combined cycle process. For the consumption related costs, the economic calculation shows that the operation of a heat pump, working with a coefficient of performance of four and for a natural gas price of 25 €/MWh, is the cheapest way of heat production as long as the electricity price is lower than 45 €/MWh. For the period from January 2013 until June 2016 the total costs of heat, based on real gas and electricity prices from the European Energy Exchange, are calculated and analysed. The results show that the share of heat provided by the heat pump system varies between 45% and 76%. Especially in 2013 and 2014, the economic conditions for operating heat pumps were very good. Since October 2015 the natural gas prices have seen a decrease which favours industrial heat supply with combined heat and power systems.
PAPER REVISED: 2018-03-23
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2018-03-27
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2018, VOLUME 22, ISSUE Issue 5, PAGES [2203 - 2213]
  1. Lambauer, J., et al., Industrial Large Heat Pumps ‒ Potentials, Barriers and Best Practice Examples (in German), Research Report, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2008
  2. IEA Heat Pump Centre, Annex 35, Application of Industrial Heat Pumps, Policy Paper, Sweden, 2014
  3. Wolf, S., et al., Analysis of the Potential of Industrial Heat Pumps in Germany (in German), Research Report, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2014
  4. Chamoun, M., et al., Dynamic Model of an Industrial Heat Pump Using Water as Refrigerant, Interna-tional Journal of Refrigeration, 35 (2012), 4, pp. 1080-1091
  5. Chamoun, M., et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigations of a New High Temperature Heat Pump for Industrial Heat Recovery Using Water as Refrigerant, International Journal of Refrigeration, 44 (2014), Aug., pp. 177-188
  6. Soltani, S., et al., A Comparative Exergoeconomic Analysis of Two Biomass and Co-firing Combined Power Plants, Energy Conversion and Management, 76 (2013), Dec., pp. 83-91
  7. Sahoo, P. K., et al., Exergoeconomic Optimisation of a Cogeneration System Using Exergy Splitting Method, Proceedings, 26th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, ECOS 2013, Guilin, China, 2013
  8. Kaviri, A. G., et al., Modelling and Exergoeconomic Based Design Optimisation of Combined Power Plants, International Journal of Exergy, 13 (2013), 2, pp. 141-158
  9. Atmaca, A., Yumrutas, R., Thermodynamic and Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Cement Plant: Part I ‒ Methodology, Energy Conversion and Management, 79 (2014), Mar., pp. 790-798
  10. Philipp, M., et al., Optimal Energy Supply Structures for Industrial Good Processing Sites in Different Countries Considering Energy Transitions, Energy, 146 (2018), Mar., pp. 112-123
  11. Härtel, P., Sandau, F., Aggregated Modelling Approach of Power and Heat Sector Coupling Technolo-gies in Power System Models, Conference Paper, 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Dresden, Germany, 2017
  12. Miah, J. H., et al., Maximising the Recovery of Low Grade Heat: An Integrated Heat Integration Framework Incorporating Heat Pump Intervention for Simple and Complex Factories, Applied Energy, 160 (2015), Dec., pp. 172-184
  13. Becker, H., et al., Process Integration and Opportunities for Heat Pumps in Industrial Processes, Inter-national Journal of Thermodynamics, 14 (2011), 2, pp. 59-70
  14. Staine, F., Favrat, D., Energy Integration of Industrial Processes Based on the Pinch Analysis Method Extended to Include Exergy Factors, Applied Thermal Engineering, 16 (1996), 6, pp. 497-507
  15. Schäfer, A., et al., Modeling Heat Pumps as Combined Heat and Power Plants in Energy Generation Planning, IEEE Energytech, Conference Paper, Cleveland: Ohio, United States of America, 2012
  16. Uran, V., Optimization System for Combined Heat and Electricity Production in the Wood-processing Industry, Energy, 31 (2006), 14, pp. 2996-3016
  17. Ahrendts, J., Reference States, Energy, 5 (1979), 8-9, pp. 667-677
  18. Baehr, H. D., Kabelac, S., Thermodynamik Grundlagen und Technische Anwendungen, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Germany, 2012
  19. ***, Siemens Gas Turbines,
  20. Bejan, A., Second Law Analysis in Heat Transfer, Energy, 5 (1979), 8-9, pp. 721-732
  21. ***, E-Control,
  22. ***, E-Control,
  23. Schneider, W., BWL-Crash-Kurs Kosten- und Leistungsrechnung, UVK-Verl.-Ges., Konstanz, Germany, 2006
  24. Association of German Engineers, Guideline VDI 2067 ‒ Efficiency of Building Services Systems (in German), Bauphysik, 25 (2003), 6, pp. 408-409
  25. Zhang, J., et al., A Comprehensive Review on Advances and Applications of Industrial Heat Pumps Based on the Practices in China, Applied Energy, 178 (2016), Sept., pp. 800-825

© 2021 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence