International Scientific Journal


Calcium looping (CaL) is promising for large-scale CO2 capture in the power generation and industrial sectors due to the cheap sorbent used and the relatively low energy penalties achieved with this process. Because of the high operating temperatures the heat utilisation is a major advantage of the process, since a significant amount of power can be generated from it. However, this increases its complexity and capital costs. Therefore, not only the energy efficiency performance is important for these cycles, but also the capital costs must be taken into account, i.e. techno-economic analyses are required in order to determine which parameters and configurations are optimal to enhance technology viability in different integration scenarios. In this study the integration scenarios of CaL cycles and natural gas combined cycles (NGCC) are explored. The process models of the NGCC and CaL capture plant are developed to explore the most promising scenarios for NGCC-CaL integration with regards to efficiency penalties. Two scenarios are analysed in detail, and show that the system with heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) before and after the capture plant exhibited better performance of 49.1% efficiency compared with that of 45.7% when only one HRSG is located after the capture plant. However, the techno-economic analyses showed that the more energy efficient case, with two HRSGs, implies relatively higher cost of electricity (COE), 44.1€/MWh, when compared to that of the reference plant system (33.1€/MWh). The predicted cost of CO2 avoided for the case with two HRSGS is 29.3 €/ton CO2.
PAPER REVISED: 2015-10-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2015-10-15
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2016, VOLUME 20, ISSUE Supplement 1, PAGES [S59 - S67]
  1. IPCC, Climate change 2007: mitigation: contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, 2007.
  2. MacDowell, N., et al., An overview of CO2 capture technologies, Energy Environ. Sci., 3 (2010), 11, pp. 1645−1669.
  3. He, M. T., et al., Green carbon science: Scientific basis for integrating carbon resource processing, utilization, and recycling, Angew. Chem., Int., 52 (2013), 37, pp. 9620−9633
  4. IEA, Technology Roadmap: Carbon capture and storage, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2013.
  5. GCCSI, Boundary Dam integrated carbon capture and sequestration demonstration project, available at: (accessed 10/08/2015).
  6. Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies at MIT, Boundary Dam Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project, available at: (accessed 10/08//2015).
  7. Shimizu T., et al., A Twin Fluid-Bed Reactor for Removal of CO2 from Combustion Processes, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 77 (1999), 1, pp. 62-68, doi: 10.1205/026387699525882.
  8. Romano M. C., Modelling the carbonator of a Ca-looping process for CO2 capture from power plant flue gas, Chem. Eng. Sci., 69 (2012), 1, pp. 257-269, doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.10.041.
  9. MacKenzie, A, et al., Economics of CO2 capture using the calcium cycle with a pressurizedfluidized bed combustor, Energy Fuels, 21 (2007), 2, pp. 920− 926.
  10. Romeo, L. M., et al., Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants, Energy Conversion and Management, 49 (2008), 10, pp. 2809-2814.
  11. Boot-Handford, M. E., et al., Carbon capture and storage update, Energy Environ. Sci., 7 (2014), 1, pp. 130−189.
  12. Zhao, M., et al., A review of technoeconomic models for the retrofitting of conventional pulverised-coal power plants for post-combustion capture (PCC) of CO2. Energy Environ. Sci., 6 (2013), 1, pp. 25−40.
  13. Blamey J., et al., The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36 (2010), 2, pp. 260-279, doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.10.001.
  14. Martínez, I., et al., Integration of a Ca-looping system for CO2 capture in an existing power plant, AIChEJ, 57 (2011), 9, pp. 2599-2607.
  15. Abanades, J. C., et al., 2005, Fluidized Bed Combustion Systems Integrating CO2 Capture with CaO, Environ. Sci.and Tech., 39 (2005), 8, pp. 2861-2866.
  16. Romeo, L. M., et al., Optimizing make-up flow in a CO2 capture system using CaO, Chemical Engineering Journal, 147 (2009), 2-3, pp. 252-258.
  17. Vorrias, I., et al., Calcium looping for CO2 capture from a lignite fired power plant, Fuel, 113 (2013), pp. 826-836.
  18. Berstad, D., et al., NGCC post-combustion CO2 capture with Ca/carbonate looping: Efficiency dependency on sorbent properties, capture unit performance and process configuration, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 24 (2014), pp. 43-53 doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.02.015.
  19. Berstad, D., et al., Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle by CaO/CaCO3 looping, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 11 (2012), pp. 25-33. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.021.
  20. Manzolini, G., et al., CO2 capture in natural gas combined cycle with SEWGS. Part A: Economic assessment, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 12 (2013), 0, pp. 502-509.
  21. NPCC (Northwest Power Planning Council), Natural Gas Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plants. New Resource Characterization for the Fifth Power Plan, 2002.
  22. Rao, A.D., Combined Cycle Systems for Near-Zero Emission Power Generation, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2012.
  23. Farmer, R., De Biasi, B., Gas Turbine World Handbook, Gas Turbine World, Fairfield, CT,2010
  24. Lu, D. Y., et al., Ca-based sorbent looping combustion for CO2 capture in pilot-scale dual fluidized bed, Fuel Proc. Tech., 89 (2008), 12, pp. 1386-1395.
  25. Valverde, J. M., A model on the CaO multicyclic conversion in the Ca-looping process, Chem. Eng. Journal, 228 (2013), pp. 1195-1206.
  26. Valverde, J. M., et al., CO2 multicyclic capture of pretreated/doped CaO in the Ca-looping process. Theory and experiments, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 15 (2013), 28, pp. 11775-11793.
  27. Rodríguez, N., et al., Average activity of CaO particles in a calcium looping system", Chem. Eng. Journal, 156 (2010), 2, pp. 388-394.
  28. Hanak, D. P., et al., Modelling and comparison of calcium looping and chemical solvent scrubbing retrofits for CO2 capture from coal-fired power plant, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 42 (2015), pp. 226-236.
  29. Romano, M. C., Ultra-high CO2 capture efficiency in CFB oxyfuel power plants by calcium looping process for CO2 recovery from purification units vent gas, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18 (2013), pp. 57-67.
  30. Page, S. C., et al., Carbon capture and storage: Fundamental thermodynamics and current technology, Energy Policy, 37 (2009), 9, pp. 3314-3324.
  31. Versteeg, P., Rubin, E. S., Technical and economic assessment of ammonia-based post-combustion CO2 capture, Energy Procedia, 4 (2011), 0, pp. 1957-1964.
  32. Rao, A.B., Rubin, E.S., A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control, Environ. Sci. and Tech., 36 (2002), 20, pp. 4467-4475.
  33. Martínez, I., et al., Integrated combined cycle from natural gas with CO2 capture using a Ca-Cu chemical loop, AIChE Journal, 59 (2013), 8, pp. 2780- 2794.
  34. Manzolini, G., et al., CO2 capture in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle with SEWGS - Part B: Economic assessment, Fuel, 105 (2013), 0, pp. 220-227.
  35. Kehlhofer, R., et al., Combined-cycle gas & steam turbine power plants, Pennwell Books, Oklahoma, USA, 2009.
  36. Figueroa, J.D., et al., Advances in CO2 capture technology—The US Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2 (2008), 1, pp. 9-20.
  37. Peters, M.S., et al., Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (vol. 5), McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2002.
  38. IEA, Annual Energy Outlook, International Energy Agency, Washington DC, USA, 2015.
  39. Manzolini, G., et al., Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology Applied Energy, 138 (2015), pp. 546-558.

© 2019 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence