THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

BIOMASS PRODUCTION AS RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCE AT RECLAIMED SERBIAN LIGNITE OPEN-CAST MINES

ABSTRACT
The main goal of this paper is the overview of the scope and dynamics of biomass production as a renewable energy source for substitution of coal in the production of electrical energy in the Kolubara coal basin. In order to successfully realize this goal, it was necessary to develop a dynamic model of the process of coal production, overburden dumping and re-cultivation of dumping sites by biomass planting. The results obtained by simulation of the dynamic model of biomass production in Kolubara mine basin until year 2045 show that 6870 hectares of overburden waste dumps will be re-cultivated by biomass plantations. Biomass production modeling point out the significant benefits of biomass production by planting the willow Salix viminalis cultivated for energy purposes. Under these conditions, a 0.6 % participation of biomass at the end of the period of intensive coal production, year 2037, is achieved. With the decrease of coal production to 15 million tons per year, this percentage steeply rises to 1.4 % in 2045. This amount of equivalent tons of coal from biomass can be used for coal substitution in the production of electrical energy. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. TR 33039]
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2014-06-26
PAPER REVISED: 2015-01-18
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2015-01-30
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2015-02-08
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI140626014J
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2015, VOLUME 19, ISSUE 3, PAGES [823 - 835]
REFERENCES
  1. Naill, R. F., The Discovery Life Cycle of a Finite Resource: A case study of U.S. natural gas, in Meadows, D. L. (Ed.) Toward Global Equilibrium: Collected Papers. Cambridge, 1973, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Naill, R., " Natural Gas Discovery Model", System Dynamic Society, 1977.
  3. Naill R. F., Managing the Energy Transition: A System Dynamics Search for Alternatives to Oil and Gas, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1977.
  4. Sterman, J., Economic vulnerability and the energy transition, Energy Systems and Policy, 7(4), (1983), pp. 259-301.
  5. Sterman, J. D., Richardson, G. P., An Experiment to Evaluate Methods for Estimating Fossil Fuel Resources. Presented at the Third International Symposium on Forecasting, Philadelphia, PA, 1983, June 5-8, Available at: dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/ 2046/1/SWP-1435-12141939.pdf, accessed in May 2007
  6. Pal, D., Sterman, J., Richarson, G., A Petroleum life cycle model for the United States with endogenous technology, exploration, recovery, and demand, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 6, no. 1, (1990).
  7. Fiddaman, T., Feedback Complexity in Integrated Climate-Economy Models, Massachusetts Institute Technology, Massachusetts, 1997.
  8. Rudianto, E., COAL IN EUROPE: WHAT FUTURE? Prospects of the coal industry and impacts study of the Kyoto Protocol, PhD thesis, Centre de Géosciences - Ecole des Mines de Paris, 2006.
  9. Davidsen, P., Sterman J., Richardson G., A petroleum life cycle model for the United States with endogenous technology, exploration, recovery and demand, System Dynamics Review 6, (1990), (1), pp. 66-73.
  10. Fiddaman, T., Exploring policy options with a behavioral climate-economy model, System Dynamic Review, Vol. 18, (2002), No.2.
  11. Forrester, J. W., Principles of Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1968.
  12. VENSIM software, vensim.com/vensim-software/
  13. Helfrich N., Schade W., Bringing distributed software development to SD modeling with vensim, the 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Athens, Greece, July 2008.
  14. Sterman J. D., Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
  15. Wu, M. and Yan, H., Simulation in software engineering with system dynamics: a case study, Journal of Software, vol. 4, (2009) no. 10, pp. 1127-1135.
  16. Babovic, N.V., Dražic, G.D., orevic, A.M., Mogucnosti koišcenja biomase poreklom od brzorastuce trske Miscanthus×giganteus, Hem. Ind., (2012) 66, pp. 223-233.
  17. Gonzales-Hernandez et al., A multiple species approach to biomass production from native herbaceous perennial feedstock, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol.-Plant, (2009) 45, pp. 267-281.
  18. Sarath, G., Baird, L.M., Mitchel, R.B., Senescence, dormancy and tillering in perennial C4 grasses. Plant Science, (2014), pp. 140-151.
  19. Sanderson MSMA, Owens V, Keyser P, Elbersen W. Crop menagment of switchgrass, in: Monti A (eds), Switchgrass, vol I, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2012: pp. 87-112.
  20. Sarath, G. et al., Opprtunities and roadblock in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels, J Ind Micrbiol Biotechnol, (2008), 35, pp. 343-354.
  21. Perrin, R., Vogel, K., Schmer M, Mitchell R., Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass, Bioenergy Res., (2008) 1, pp. 91-97.
  22. Jezowski, S., Yield traits of six clones of Miscanthus in the first 3 years following planning in Poland, Ind Crop Prod, (2008) 27, pp. 65-68.
  23. Miguez F.E., Villamil M.B., Long S.P., Bollero G.A., Meta-analysis of the effects of management factors on Miscanthus × giganteus growth and biomass production, Agric For Meteorol, (2008) 148, pp. 1280-1292.
  24. Mi, J.A., Liu, W.B., Yang, W.B., Yan, J.C., Li, J.C., Sang, T.A.B., Carbon sequestration by Miscanthus energy crops plantations in a broad range semi-arid marginal land in China, Science of the Total Environment, (2014) 496, pp. 373-380.
  25. Nsanganwiman, F.A., Pourru, B.A., Mench, B.A., Douay, B.A., Suitability of Miscanthus species for managing inorganic and organic contaminated land and restoring ecosystem services, Journal of Environmental Management, (2014) 143, pp. 123-134.
  26. Li, C.A., Xiao, B.A.B., Wang, Q.H.A., Yao, S.H.A., Wu, J.Y.A., Phytoremediation of Zn- and Crcontaminated soil using two promising energy grasses, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, (2014) 225, Article number 2027.
  27. Okiemen, F.E., Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecology, (2011), pp. 1-20.
  28. Rascio, N., Navari-Izzo, F., Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Science, (2011) 180 (2), pp. 169-181.
  29. Casler M.D., Switchgrass breeding, genetics and genomics, in: A. Monti (Ed.) Switchgrass. Green Energy and Technology, vol. I, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2012, pp: 29-53.
  30. Jung, H.J., Samad, D.A., Sarath, G., Modifying crops to increase cell wall digestibility, Plant Sci., (2012), pp. 65-77.
  31. Kim, J.Y., Oh, S., Hwang, H., Moon, Y.H., Choi, J.W., Assessment of miscanthus biomass (Miscanthus sacchariflorus) for conversion and utilization of bio-oil by fluidized bed type fast pyrolysis, Energy, (2014), pp. 1-8.
  32. Kim, K.H., Eom, I.Y., Lee, S.M., Choi, D., Yeo, H., Choi, I.G. et al., Investigation of physicochemical properties of bio-oils produced from yellow poplar wood (Liriodendron tulipifera) at various temperature and residence times, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, (2011) 92, pp. 2-9.
  33. The Faculty of Agriculture Belgrade-Zemun, Integral overview of realized measures, with the proposal of an up-to-date solution in re-cultivation of open-pits of Kostolac and Kolubara basins, Study, 2012
  34. Guliberg, U., Towards making willows pilot species for coppicing production, Forestry Chronicle, (1993) 69, pp. 721-726
  35. Zsuffa, L., Mosseler, A., Raj, Y., Prospectsforinterspecic hybridization in willow for biomass production. In: Perttu K, editor. Ecology and management of forest biomass production systems, Report 15. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology and Environmental, Research, 1984, pp. 261-81.
  36. Kopp, R.F., Abrahamson, L.P., White, E.H., Volk, T.A., Nowak, C.A., Fillhart, R.C., Willow biomass production during ten successive annual harvests, Biomass and Bioenergy, (2001) 20, pp. 1-7.
  37. Danilovic, M., Stojnic, D., Vasiljevic, V., Gacic, D., Biomass from Short Rotation Energy Plantations of Black Locuston Tailing Dump of »Field B« Open Pit in Kolubara Mining Basin, Nova meh. šumar. 34 (2013).
  38. Klašnja, B., Orlovic, S., Galic, Z., Comparison of Different Wood Species as Raw Materials for Bioenergy, South-East Eur, 4 (2), (2013), pp. 81-88.
  39. Report of mineral resources reserves of Kolubara mine basin, Baroševac, February 10, 2014.
  40. Stefanovic, P. et all, The emission factor of lignite in the Kolubara basin, Termotehnika, No. 4, (2010), pp 266-274. (in Serbian).

© 2019 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence