THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Projections of electricity energy mix changes towards nearly carbon neutrality by 2050

ABSTRACT
Global electricity consumption reached 28,197 TWh in 2022 and it is expected to rise to 64,513 TWh by 2050, reflecting estimated annual growth rate of 3%. This paper evaluates ten electricity generation technologies-coal, natural gas, hydro, solar photovoltaic, wind, nuclear, geothermal, biomass, biogas, and wave & tidal-each contributing uniquely to global energy production. Despite notable advancements in clean energy technologies, including renewables and nuclear power, global greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase. The focus of this paper is to propose strategies for constructing new power plants while decommissioning old ones to achieve near carbon neutrality by 2050. Various shares of renewable and nuclear energy in total electricity production are modeled. The analysis examines greenhouse gas emissions, required capacity for each technology, decommissioning costs of old infrastructure, investment requirements for new plants, and land requirements for their construction. Findings indicate that proposed scenarios are feasible but require more aggressive measures to limit global temperature rise to manageable levels. By simulating diverse strategies, policymakers can better understand potential impacts and make informed decisions regarding necessary changes. Increasing the share of renewable energy, supported by nuclear power, emerges as the primary pathway to achieve carbon neutrality target by 2050. This analysis adopts a global perspective with a transparent model design that allows easy adaptation to other contexts.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-10-15
PAPER REVISED: 2024-12-25
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2025-01-05
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2025-02-16
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI241015019G
REFERENCES
  1. ***, PARIS AGREEMENT, UNFCCC, 2015, unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  2. ***, COP28 DECLARATION ON CLIMATE, RELIEF, RECOVERY AND PEACE, United Nation Climate Chage, www.cop28.com/en/cop28 declaration on climate relief recovery and peace
  3. ***, EU Energy Roadmap 2050 (Impact Assessment and Scenario Analysis)," SEC, 15 Dec 2011. eur lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0885:FIN:EN:PDF
  4. Xu, G., et al., China can reach carbon neutrality before 2050 by improving economic development quality, Energy, 243 (2022), doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123087
  5. Gvozdenac Urošević, D. D., Optimization Model for Improvement of District Heating System by Integration of Cogeneration, Thermal Science, 25 (2021), 1A, pp. 307 320, doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200504207G
  6. Djaković, D. D., et al., Multi Criteria Analysis as a Support for National Energy Policy Regarding the Use of Biomass Case Study of Serbia -, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), 2, pp. 371 380, DOI: 10.2298/TSCI150602190D
  7. Zhou, Y., et al., A cross scale modelling and decarbonisation quantification approach for navigating Carbon Neutrality Pathways in China, Energy Conversion and Management, 297, (2023) 117733, doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117733
  8. Ritchie, H., Roser, M., CO₂ Emissions, Our World In Data, (2020), ourworldindata.org/co2 emissions
  9. Jovanović, M., et al., Scenarios for transitioning the electricity sector of the Republic of Serbia to sustainable climate neutrality by 2050, Utilities Policy, 85 (2023) 101681, doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101681
  10. ***, An Updated Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions by 2050, IEA, 2022, www.iea.org/reports/world energy outlook 2022/an updated roadmap to net zero emissions by 2050
  11. ***, International Energy Agency (IEA), www.iea.org/
  12. ***, Energy Information Administration (EIA), www.eia.gov/
  13. ***, World Energy Council (WEC), www.worldenergy.org/
  14. ***, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), www.irena.org/
  15. ***, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR), ceepr.mit.edu/
  16. ***, Carbon Capture and Storage Association (CCSA), www.ccsassociation.org/
  17. ***, STATISTA, www.statista.com/
  18. ***, EMBER, ember-climate.org/data/
  19. Wanga, Y., et al., A Review of Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Technologies from Coal-Fired Power Plants, Energy Procedia, 114 (2017), pp. 650-665, DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1209
  20. Ren, Z., et al., The feasibility and policy engagements in achieving net zero emission in China's power sector by 2050: A LEAP-REP model analysis, Energy Conversion and Management, 304, (2024) 118230, doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118230
  21. Biniek, K., et al., Global Energy Perspective - CCUS Outlook, McKinsey & Company, Jan 2023, www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/global-energy-perspective-2023-ccus-outlook
  22. Handayani, K., et al., Seeking for a climate change mitigation and adaptation nexus: Analysis of a long-term power system expansion, Applied Energy, 262 (2020), doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114485
  23. Steen, M., Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Fossil Fuel Fired Power Generation Systems, EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE, op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/221658dd-9556-4591-86ea-51544346a8f7
  24. Ritchie, H., et al., Energy Production and Consumption, Our World in Data, 2024. ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption
  25. Jin, H., et al., Long-term electricity demand forecasting under low-carbon energy transition: Based on the bidirectional feedback between power demand and generation mix, Energy, 286, (2024) 129435, doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129435
  26. Lindsey, R., Dahlman, L., Climate Change: Global Temperature," Climate.gov, 18 Jan 2024, www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
  27. Cameron, L., Carter, A., Why Carbon Capture and Storage Is Not a Net-Zero Solution for Canada's Oil and Gas Sector, International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2023, www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-02/bottom-line-carbon-capture-not-net-zero-solution.pdf
  28. ***, National Energy Technology Laboratory, www.netl. doe.gov/
  29. ***, Average Capacity Factor for Utility-Scale Solar PV Systems Worldwide from 2010 to 2022, STATISTA, 2024, www.statista.com/statistics/799330/global-solar-pv-installation-cost-per-kilowatt/
  30. ***, Life Cycle Emissions Factors for Electricity Generation Technologies, NREL Data Catalog, 2022, data.nrel.gov/submissions/171
  31. ***, Carbon dioxide emissions factors, Our World in Data, 2024, ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-dioxide-emissions-factor
  32. ***, K22: Full Chain Process Flow Diagrams, White Rose, Dec 2015, assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a758e31ed915d506ee7fbc3/K22_Process_Flow_Diagrams.pdf
  33. Baylin-Stern, A., Berghout, N., Is carbon capture too expensive? IEA50, 2021 www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive
  34. Fisher, J., Poynting, M., What is carbon capture and how does it fight climate change?, BBC News Climate & Science, 11 Dec 2023, www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-64723497
  35. Bamisile, O., et al., A 2030 and 2050 feasible/sustainable decarbonization perusal for China's Sichuan Province: A deep carbon neutrality analysis and EnergyPLAN, Energy Conversion and Management, 261 (2022) 115605, doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115605
  36. ***, Energy Technology Perspectives 2020, Special Report on Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions, IEA, 2022, iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/181b48b4-323f-454d-96fb-0bb1889d96a9/CCUS_in_clean_energy_transitions.pdf
  37. ***, GLOBAL STATUS OF CCS 2023 - SCALING UP THROUGH 2030, Global CCS Institute, www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/global-status-of-ccs-2023-executive-summary/
  38. Mahapatra, M., The Price Tag of Carbon Capture: Analysis of the Economics of CCUS, Aug 2023, www.linkedin.com/pulse/price-tag-carbon-capture-analysis-economics-ccus-mahapatra-pmp-/
  39. Mohd Amer, N., et al., Modification of biomass-derived biochar: A practical approach towards development of sustainable CO2 adsorbent, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14 (2022), 6, pp. 7401-7448, doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02905-3
  40. ***, Around the world in 22 carbon capture projects, Carbon Brief TECHNOLOGY, 7 Oct 2014, www.carbonbrief.org/around-the-world-in-22-carbon-capture-projects/
  41. ***, Energy Technology Perspectives 2020, Special Report on Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions), IEA, 2022, iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/181b48b4-323f-454d-96fb-0bb1889d96a9/CCUS_in_clean_energy_transitions.pdf
  42. ***, The world needs to capture, use, and store gigatons of CO2: Where and how? McKinsey, Apr 2023, www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/the-world-needs-to-capture-use-and-store-gigatons-of-co2-where-and-how#/
  43. Adebayo, T. S., et al., Role of Country Risks and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Quality: Evidence from MINT Countries, Journal of Environmental Management, 327 (2023) 116884, doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116884
  44. Stevens, L., THE FOOTPRINT OF ENERGY: LAND USE OF U.S. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION, STRATA, 2017, docs.wind-watch.org/US-footprints-Strata-2017.pdf
  45. ***, IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, www.ipcc.ch
  46. Battersby, S., How to Expand Solar Power without Using Precious Land, PNAS, 2023, Vol. 120 No. 9 e2301355120 doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301355120
  47. Morvay, Z. K., Gvozdenac, D. D., Applied Industrial Energy and Environmental Management, John Wiley, 2008
  48. Ritchie, H., How does the land use of different electricity sources compare? Our World in Data, 2022, ourworldindata.org/land-use-per-energy-source
  49. Meinshausen, M., et al., The Shared Socio-Economic Pathway (SSP) Greenhouse Gas Concentrations and their Extensions to 2500, Geoscientific Model Development, 13, (2020), 8, pp. 3517-3605, doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
  50. Yun Hong, W., A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future, Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 3, (2022), 100044 20 doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044
  51. Sievert, K., et al., Why the Cost of Carbon Capture and Storage Remains Persistently High, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Sep 2023, www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-09/bottom-line-why-carbon-capture-storage-cos
  52. Martin-Roberts, E., et al., Carbon Capture and Storage at the End of a Lost Decade, One Earth, 4, (2021), 11, pp. 1569-1584, doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.023