THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Thermodynamics analysis and optimization of a novel liquid carbon dioxide energy storage coupled with a coal-fired power plant

ABSTRACT
In order to improve the performance of the liquid carbon dioxide energy storage (LCES) system, a coupled system including a coal-fired power plant and a LCES system is proposed in this paper. In the energy storage process, the condensate from the coal-fired power plant is used to absorb the heat of compression generated. In the energy release process, the condensate and feedwater are used to step-heat the high-pressure carbon dioxide entering the turbine inlet. The performance of the LCES subsystem is evaluated by the energy analysis, the conventional exergy analysis, and the advanced exergy analysis. Results show that the round-trip efficiency of the LCES subsystem can reach 60.52%, with an improvement of 2.35% compared with the single LCES system. The exergy efficiency of the LCES subsystem under the real cycle is 68.55% and under the unavoidable cycle is 84.16%, which indicates that the LCES subsystem has a great potential for improvement. The conventional exergy analysis indicates that the cold energy storage tank is the biggest exergy destruction component, accounting for 23.58% of the LCES subsystem exergy destruction. The split of the exergy destruction is carried out during the advanced exergy analysis, and the results show that the avoidable endogenous exergy destruction accounts for 47.44 % of all exergy destruction. The first turbine has the greatest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction, with 24.71%, indicating that it has the highest improvement potential. This paper may provide new ideas for the LCES system performance improvement.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-03-30
PAPER REVISED: 2024-11-26
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-12-05
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2025-01-09
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI240330274L
REFERENCES
  1. Zhang S., et al., A review and outlook on cloud energy storage: An aggregated and shared utilizing method of energy storage system, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185 (2023), pp. 113-606
  2. Paraschiv S. Analysis of the variability of low-carbon energy sources, nuclear technology and renewable energy sources, in meeting electricity demand, Energy Reports, 9 (2023), pp. 276-283
  3. Ma B., et al., Adaptive energy management strategy based on a model predictive control with real-time tuning weight for hybrid energy storage system, Energy, 283 (2023), pp. 129-128
  4. Zhang Y., et al., Comparative analysis of compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system and compressed air energy storage system under low-temperature conditions based on conventional and advanced exergy methods, Journal of Energy Storage, 35 (2021), pp. 102-274
  5. Liu S., et al., Comparative analysis of air and CO2 as working fluids for compressed and liquefied gas energy storage technologies, Energy Conversion and Management, 181 (2019), pp. 608-620
  6. He Q., et al., Thermodynamic analysis of a novel supercritical compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system through advanced exergy analysis, Renewable Energy, 127 (2018), pp. 835-849
  7. Liu Z., et al., Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel liquid carbon dioxide energy storage system, Energy Conversion and Management, 205 (2020), pp. 112-391
  8. He T., et al., Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system coupled with a combined heating and power unit, Energy Conversion and Management, 277 (2023), pp. 116-618
  9. Liu Z., et al., Proposal and assessment of a novel carbon dioxide energy storage system with electrical thermal storage and ejector condensing cycle: Energy and exergy analysis, Applied Energy, 269 (2020), pp. 115-067
  10. Xu W., et al., Thermo-economic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on self-evaporating liquid carbon dioxide energy storage, Applied Energy, 326 (2022), pp. 120-032
  11. Ghorbani B., et al., Novel integrated structure of carbon dioxide liquefaction energy storage system using solar energy, Journal of Energy Storage, 31 (2020), pp. 101-641
  12. Xu M., et al., Thermodynamic analysis of a novel liquid carbon dioxide energy storage system and comparison to a liquid air energy storage system, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242 (2020), pp. 118-437
  13. Chen Q., et al., The water footprint of coal-fired electricity production and the virtual water flows associated with coal and electricity transportation in China, Energy Procedia, 158 (2019), pp. 3519-3527
  14. Yan X., et al., Study on the thermodynamic performance of a coupled compressed air energy storage system in a coal-fired power plant, Journal of Energy Storage, 68 (2023), pp. 107-727
  15. Wan Y., et al., A technical feasibility study of a liquid carbon dioxide energy storage system: Integrated component design and off-design performance analysis, Applied Energy , 350 (2023), pp. 121-797
  16. Kelly S., et al., Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts, Energy, 34 (2009), pp. 384-391
  17. Chen J., et al., Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of an ejector refrigeration system, Applied Energy, 144 (2015), pp. 139-151
  18. Wang Z., et al., Conventional and advanced exergy analyses of an underwater compressed air energy storage system, Applied Energy, 180 (2016), pp. 810-822
  19. Yang Y., et al., Comprehensive exergy-based evaluation and parametric study of a coal-fired ultra-supercritical power plant, Applied Energy, 122 (2013), pp. 1087-1099