THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Thermal management of methanol steam reforming reactor by back propagation neural network and particle swarm optimization algorithm

ABSTRACT
Methanol steam reforming (MSR) reactor is a device that converts the methanol into hydrogen. Since the MSR is an endothermic reaction, the methanol conversion is usually affected by the heating conditions. So, to improve the methanol conversion, the heating condition should be managed. This study aims to present a framework and methodology for studying the thermal management of a determined MSR reactor by controlling the heating conditions. Firstly, the characteristics of a three-dimensional MSR reactor are carried out, and the effects of the inlet condition parameters e.g. heating parameters and fuel supply parameters, on the methanol conversion are investigated. Then, the performance prediction of the MSR reactor is studied using several common intelligence algorithms and the corresponding surrogate models are obtained. The back propagation neural network (BPNN) surrogate model shows the best prediction accuracy than stepwise linear (SL), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), linear support vector machines (L-SVM), and random forest algorithms (RFA). Finally, the thermal management of the MSR reactor is carried out by combining the surrogate model and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to obtain better performance. The results show that hydrogen production of the MSR reactor can be generally guaranteed by the characteristic curves of the heating parameters and fuel supply parameters, and the methanol conversion can be maintained steadily above 93% within the whole period of the hydrogen production requirements.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-06-30
PAPER REVISED: 2024-09-04
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-09-06
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2024-10-12
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI240630224H
REFERENCES
  1. Ishaq, H., et. al., A review on hydrogen production and utilization: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, (62), 26238-26264
  2. Arsad, A. Z., et. al., Hydrogen energy storage integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: A review analysis for future research directions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, (39), 17285-17312
  3. Li, H., et. al., Safety of hydrogen storage and transportation: An overview on mechanisms, techniques, and challenges. Energy Reports 2022, 8, 6258-6269
  4. Sá, S., et. al., Catalysts for methanol steam reforming—A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2010, 99, (1-2), 43-57
  5. Palo, D. R., et. al., Methanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production. Chemical reviews 2007, 107, (10), 3992-4021
  6. Wang, J., et. al., Theoretical insight into methanol steam reforming on indium oxide with different coordination environments. Science China Chemistry 2017, 61, (3), 336-343
  7. Li, H., et. al., On-board methanol catalytic reforming for hydrogen Production-A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, (43), 22303-22327
  8. Jahnisch, K., et. al., Chemistry in microstructured reactors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2004, 43, (4), 406-46
  9. Srivastava, A., et. al., A numerical study on methanol steam reforming reactor utilizing engine exhaust heat for hydrogen generation. international journal o f hydrogen energy 2021, 46, 38073-33808
  10. Perng, S.-W., et. al., Numerical analysis of performance enhancement and non-isothermal reactant transport of a cylindrical methanol reformer wrapped with a porous sheath under steam reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, (38), 24372-24392
  11. Zheng, T., et. al., Methanol steam reforming performance optimisation of cylindrical microreactor for hydrogen production utilising error backpropagation and genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019, 357, 641-654
  12. Pajak., M., et. al., A multiobjective optimization of a catalyst distribution in a methane_steam reforming reactor using a genetic algorithm. international journal o f hydrogen energy 2021, 46, 20183-20197
  13. Na, J., et. al., Multi-objective optimization of microchannel reactor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017, 313, 1521-1534
  14. Chen, W. H., et. al., Reactor design of methanol steam reforming by evolutionary computation and hydrogen production maximization by machine learning. International Journal of Energy Research 2021, 46, (14), 20685-20703
  15. Qi, Y., et. al., System behavior prediction by artificial neural network algorithm of a methanol steam reformer for polymer electrolyte fuel cell stack use. Fuel Cells 2021, 21, (3), 279-289
  16. Vo, N. D., et. al., Sensitivity analysis and artificial neural network-based optimization for low-carbon H2 production via a sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming (SESMR) process integrated with separation process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, (2), 820-847
  17. Zhu, R., et. al., Performance enhancement of double-jacketed methanol steam reforming reactor. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology) 2022, 53, 4602−4616
  18. Purnama, H., et. al., CO formation/selectivity for steam reforming of methanol with a commercial CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst. Applied Catalysis A: General 2004, 259, (1), 83-94
  19. Karim, A., et. al., Comparison of wall-coated and packed-bed reactors for steam reforming of methanol. Catalysis Today 2005, 110, (1-2), 86-91
  20. Xu, G., et. al., Performance improvement of solid oxide fuel cells by combining three-dimensional CFD modeling, artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management 2022, 268
  21. H. Qi, et. al., Inversion of particle size distribution by spectral extinction technique using the attractive and repulsive particle swarm optimization algorithm, Thermal Science, 2015, 19(6), 2151-2160