THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

Snežana P. Marković

,

Ljubo P. Marković

,

Mirjana J. Miletić

,

Rada M. Radulović

,

Ružica T. Božović

online first only

Enhancing sustainable facade design: A Belgrade case study

ABSTRACT
This research examines the potential of widespread facade systems to improve energy performance and enhance user comfort in residential buildings. Utilizing Design Builder software (Version 5.0.3.7), the study specifically aimed to reduce heating energy consumption, a significant concern in the climatic conditions of Serbia. The methodology incorporated both technical performance assessments and economic analyses, evaluating the economic viability through metrics such as Return on Investment (ROI), Net present value (NPV), and Internal rate of return (IRR). The multi-criteria evaluation framework employed allowed for a comprehensive analysis, balancing technical performance with economic and qualitative factors to identify the most favorable facade systems. By addressing both the immediate economic returns and longer-term benefits, this research contributes to a more sustainable and economically feasible building practice.
KEYWORDS
glazing systems, façades, residential buildings, energy performance, cost benefit analysis
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-05-20
PAPER REVISED: 2024-09-03
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-09-05
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2024-10-12
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI240520218M
REFERENCES
  1. Azizi, S., Nair, G., & Olofsson, T., Adoption of energy efficiency measures in renovation of single-family houses: A comparative approach. Energies, 13(22) (2020), 6042. doi: 10.3390/EN13226042
  2. Kosanović, S., Miletić, M., & Marković, L., Energy refurbishment of family houses in Serbia in line with the principles of circular economy. Sustainability, 13(10) (2021), 5463. doi: 10.3390/SU13105463
  3. P. Sassi, "Strategies for sustainable architecture," Strateg. Sustain. Archit., pp. 1-305, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.4324/9780203480106/STRATEGIES-SUSTAINABLE-ARCHITECTURE-PAOLA-SASSI/ACCESSIBILITY-INFORMATION
  4. M. Keitsch, "Sustainable Architecture, Design and Housing," Sustain. Dev., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 141-145, May 2012, doi: 10.1002/SD.1530
  5. J. Pohl, "Sustainable Architecture Concepts and Principles," Build. Sci., pp. 225-258, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1002/9781444392333.CH12
  6. M. L. Maddaus, W. O. Maddaus, M. Torre, and R. Harris, "Innovative water conservation supports sustainable housing development," J. / Am. Water Work. Assoc., vol. 100, no. 5, 2008, doi: 10.1002/J.1551-8833.2008.TB09634.X
  7. J. Pohl, "Building Science: Concepts and Application," Build. Sci. Concepts Appl., May 2011, doi: 10.1002/9781444392333
  8. L. Mitchell and E. Burton, "Neighbourhoods for life: Designing dementia-friendly outdoor environments," Qual. Ageing Older Adults, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 26-33, 2006, doi: 10.1108/14717794200600005
  9. W. R. Moomaw, R. R. Bhandary, L. Kuhl, and P. Verkooijen, "Sustainable Development Diplomacy: Diagnostics for the Negotiation and Implementation of Sustainable Development," Glob. Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 73-81, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12350
  10. U. Schulz et al., "Some recent trends in research and technology of advanced thermal barrier coatings," Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73-80, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1270-9638(02)00003-2
  11. S. T. Nguyen, J. Feng, S. K. Ng, J. P. W. Wong, V. B. C. Tan, and H. M. Duong, "Advanced thermal insulation and absorption properties of recycled cellulose aerogels," Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 445, pp. 128-134, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2014.01.015
  12. F. Hu, S. Wu, and Y. Sun, "Hollow-Structured Materials for Thermal Insulation," Adv. Mater., vol. 31, no. 38, p. 1801001, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1002/ADMA.201801001
  13. E. Cuce and S. B. Riffat, "A state-of-the-art review on innovative glazing technologies," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 41, pp. 695-714, 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2014.08.084
  14. J. Huang, S. Wang, F. Teng, and W. Feng, "Thermal performance optimization of envelope in the energy-saving renovation of existing residential buildings," Energy Build., vol. 247, p. 111103, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2021.111103
  15. M. Brown, "Innovative energy-efficiency policies: An international review," Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-25, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1002/WENE.125
  16. L. M. López-Ochoa, J. Las-Heras-Casas, L. M. López-González, and C. García-Lozano, "Energy Renovation of Residential Buildings in Cold Mediterranean Zones Using Optimized Thermal Envelope Insulation Thicknesses: The Case of Spain," Sustain. 2020, Vol. 12, Page 2287, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 2287, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12062287
  17. M. Ferreira, M. Almeida, and A. Rodrigues, "Cost-optimal energy efficiency levels are the first step in achieving cost effective renovation in residential buildings with a nearly-zero energy target," Energy Build., vol. 133, pp. 724-737, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2016.10.017
  18. P. Bertoldi, M. Economidou, V. Palermo, B. Boza-Kiss, and V. Todeschi, "How to finance energy renovation of residential buildings: Review of current and emerging financing instruments in the EU," Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. e384, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/WENE.384
  19. M. Achintha, "Sustainability of glass in construction," Sustain. Constr. Mater., pp. 79-104, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100370-1.00005-6
  20. J. X. Lu and C. S. Poon, "Recycling of waste glass in construction materials," New Trends Eco-efficient Recycl. Concr., pp. 153-167, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102480-5.00006-3
  21. S. Stevanović, "Optimization of passive solar design strategies: A review," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 25, pp. 177-196, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2013.04.028
  22. K. S. Grewal, C. Hachem-Vermette, and S. Yadav, "Decision-making method to prioritize and implement solar strategies on neighborhood level," Energy Reports, vol. 12, pp. 2062-2076, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.EGYR.2024.08.009
  23. A. K. Athieniti and M. Santamouris, "Thermal analysis and design of passive solar buildings," Therm. Anal. Des. Passiv. Sol. Build., p. 296, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.4324/9781315074351/THERMAL-ANALYSIS-DESIGN-PASSIVE-SOLAR-BUILDINGS-AK-ATHIENITIS-SANTAMOURIS
  24. S. Ghazi and K. Ip, "The effect of weather conditions on the efficiency of PV panels in the southeast of UK," Renew. Energy, vol. 69, pp. 50-59, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2014.03.018
  25. Jovanović Popović, M., Ignjatović, D., Radivojević, A., Rajčić, A., Djukanović, Lj., Ćuković Ignjatović, N., & Nedić, M. Atlas porodičnih kuća Srbije. Beograd (2012), Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
  26. Pawar, B. S., & Kanade, G. N., Energy optimization of building using Design Builder software. International Journal of New Technology and Research, 4(1), (2018)
  27. Mouter, N., et al., Comparing cost-benefit analysis and multi-criteria analysis. In Advances in Transport Policy and Planning (2020), (Vol. 6, pp. 225-254). Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/BS.ATPP.2020.07.009
  28. Mishan, E. J., & Quah, E., Cost-Benefit Analysis (6th ed.). Routledge, (2020) doi: 10.4324/9781351029780
  29. Ekardt, F., Cost-benefit analysis without convincing theoretical basis. In Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics, Environmental Humanities: Transformation, Governance, Ethics, Law. Springer, Cham. (2022), doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99284-2_5
  30. Elariane, S. A., & Dubé, J., Is smart housing a good deal? An answer based on Monte Carlo net present value analysis. Sustainability, (2019), 11(15), 4193. doi: 10.3390/su11154193
  31. Kan, I., Pintelon, L., & Martin, H., The application of multicriteria decision analysis methods in health care: A literature review. Medical Decision Making, (2022), 42(2), 262-274. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211019040
  32. Todorović, M., & Rajčić, A., Priručnik za energetsku sertifikaciju zgrada - Vodič za investiture, izvođače i projektante. Beograd (2017), Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
  33. Мarković, Lj., Cvetković, M., Milić Marković, Lj. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making when Choosing Variant Solution of Highway Route at the Level of Preliminary Design, FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series Architecture and Civil Engineering, 11 (1), 71-87
  34. Opricović, S., Tzeng, G.,H. (2007): Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking, European Journal of Operational Research 178 (2), 514-529
  35. ***, Делпхи метода - шта је то, дефиниција и концепт | Речник 2024 (no date). Available at: sr.economy-pedia.com/11038201-delphi-method (Accessed: 26 August 2024)
  36. Harmathy, N., Analysis of smart building solutions for optimizing the energy. Thermal Science, (2022), 26(4A), 3119-3132
  37. "International Energy Outlook 2016 With Projections to 2040 (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOV." www.osti.gov/biblio/1296780 (accessed Sep. 03, 2024)
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Enhancing sustainable facade design: A Belgrade case study