THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MIXING SYNGAS FROM BIOMASS GASIFICATION ON THE COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT

ABSTRACT
A combined cycle power plant coupled with biomass gasification system is pro-posed in this present research. The thermodynamic analysis is performed by the impact factor of the mixing ratio and the equivalence ratio. The results show that, with the increase of the mixing ratio from 0% to 50%, the syngas flow from biomass gasification increases from 0 kg/s to 54.20 kg/s. The inlet airflow decreases from 654.6 kg/s to 576.3 kg/s. The temperature of the flue gas increases from 586.5°C to 591.4°C. Besides, the power output of the gas turbine increases from 260.51 MW to 264.61MW, while, the power output of the steam turbine drops from 131.05 MW to 126.89 MW. Additionally, with the equivalence ratio increasing from 0.20 to 0.40, the H2 composition decreases from 3.01% to 1.53% and the CO composition drops rapidly from 23.75% to 10.44%. The net calorific value of the syngas decreases from 6709.85 kJ/kg to 3369.03 kJ/kg, the mass-flow rate of both the syngas and the flue gas increase from 6.88 kg/s to 9.02 kg/s and from 575.17 kg/s to 601.00 kg/s, respectively. Besides, the power output of the gas turbine increases from 264.49 MW to 270.17 MW, while, the power output of the steam turbine drops from 127.01 MW to 121.28 MW.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-07-19
PAPER REVISED: 2024-11-20
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-11-29
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2025-02-16
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI240719005P
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2025, VOLUME 29, ISSUE Issue 4, PAGES [2701 - 2711]
REFERENCES
  1. Yan, Y., et al., Emission Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds from Coal-, Coal Gangue-, and Biomass-Fired Power Plants in China, Atmospheric Environment, 143 (2016), Oct., pp. 261-269
  2. Mun, T.-Y., et al., Performance Evaluation of Co-Firing Various Kinds of Biomass with Low Rank Coals in a 500 MWe Coal-Fired Power Plant, Energy, 115 (2016), Part 1, pp. 954-962
  3. Wei, X., et al., Techno-Economic Assessment of Coal- or Biomass-Fired Oxy-Combustion Power Plants with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle, Energy Conversion and Management, 221 (2020), 113143
  4. Chen, A., Liu, Y., Optimizing Sustainable Biomass-Coal Co-Firing Power Plant Location Problem Under Ambiguous Supply, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 182 (2023), 109401
  5. Roy, D., Multi-Objective Optimization of Biomass Gasification Based Combined Heat and Power System Employing Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell and Externally Fired Gas Turbine, Applied Energy, 348 (2023), 121486
  6. Vakkilainen, E., et al., Large Industrial Users of Energy Biomass, Report, IEA Bioenergy, 2013
  7. Fatiguso, M., et al., Comparative Energy Performance Analysis of Micro Gas Turbine and Internal Combustion Engine in a Cogeneration Plant Based on Biomass Gasification, Journal of Cleaner Production, 434 (2024), 139782
  8. Tan, Z., et al., How do Multiple Policy Incentives Influence Investors' Decisions on Biomass Co-Firing Combined with Carbon Capture and Storage Retrofit Projects for Coal-Fired Power Plants?, Energy, 278 (2023), 127822
  9. Chen, X., et al., Performance Analysis of a Novel Biomass Gasification System Coupled to a Coal-Fired Power Plant Based on Heat and Water Recovery, Energy Conversion and Management, 299 (2024), 117822
  10. Hariana, E., et al., A Comprehensive Evaluation of Cofiring Biomass with Coal and Slagging-Fouling Tendency in Pulverized Coal-Fired Boilers, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14 (2023), 7, 102001
  11. Zhang, Q., et al., Parametric Study and Optimization of MEA-Based Carbon Capture for a Coal and Bio-mass Co-Firing Power Plant, Renewable Energy, 205 (2023), Mar., pp. 838-850
  12. Nawaz, Z., Ali, U., Techno-Economic Evaluation of Different Operating Scenarios for Indigenous and Imported Coal Blends and Biomass Co-Firing on Supercritical Coal Fired Power Plant Performance, Energy, 212 (2020), 118721
  13. Li, J., et al., Unit-Level Cost-Benefit Analysis for Coal Power Plants Retrofitted with Biomass Co-Firing at a National Level by Combined GIS and Life Cycle Assessment, Applied Energy, 285 (2021), 116494
  14. Zhang, J., et al., A Novel Power, DME, and Ammonia Polygeneration System Using Aspen Plus Based on the Integration of Biomass Gasification and Syngas Chemical Looping, Energy Conversion and Management, 299 (2024), 117808
  15. Tian, H., et al., Blend of Flue Gas from a Methane-Fueled Gas Turbine Power Plant and Syngas from Biomass Gasification Process to Feed a Novel Trigeneration Application: Thermodynamic-Economic Study and Optimization, Energy, 285 (2023), 129425
  16. Moradi, R., et al., Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Micro-Scale Gas Turbine and Supercritical CO2 Systems with Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycles Fed by the Biomass Gasification for Decentralized Tri-generation, Energy, 266 (2023), 126491
  17. Jia, J., et al., Effect of Operating Parameters on Performance of an Integrated Biomass Gasifier, Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Micro Gas Turbine System, Biomass and Bioenergy, 75 (2015), Apr., pp. 35-45
  18. Soltani, S., et al., Advanced Exergy Analysis Applied to an Externally-Fired Combined-Cycle Power Plant Integrated with a Biomass Gasification Unit, Energy, 59 (2013), Sept., pp. 775-780
  19. Aguado, R., et al., Continuous Decentralized Hydrogen Production Through Alkaline Water Electrolysis Powered by an Oxygen-Enriched Air Integrated Biomass Gasification Combined Cycle, Energy Conversion and Management, 289 (2023), 117149
  20. Chang, Y., et al., Comprehensive Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of an Innovative Power Generation System Using Biomass Gasification and LNG Regasification Processes, Energy, 283 (2023), 128491
  21. Yin, K., et al., Thermodynamic Analysis of a Plasma Co-Gasification Process for Hydrogen Production Using Sludge and Food Waste as Mixed Raw Materials, Renewable Energy, 222 (2024), 119893
  22. De Padova, A., et al., Electrolysis-Boosted Substitute Natural Gas from Biomass: Kinetic Modeling of Fluidized Bed Gasification and System Integration, Renewable Energy, 223 (2024), 120071
  23. Gharibi, A., et al., Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Polyethylene Air-Gasification Considering Energy and Environmental Aspects, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 183 (2024), Mar., pp. 46-58
  24. Jancauskas, A., et al., Experimental Investigation of Sorted Municipal Solid Wastes Producer Gas Composition in an Updraft Fixed Bed Gasifier, Energy, 289 (2024), 130063
  25. Wang, S., Fu, Z., Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis of Solar Assisted CCHP-ORC System with DME as Fuel, Energy Conversion and Management, 186 (2019), Apr., pp. 535-545
  26. Lee, S., et al., Pressure Energy Recovery of LNG Integrated with Multi-Stage Feedwater Fuel Preheaters in a Combined Cycle Power Plant, Energy, 285 (2023), 128694
  27. Abdullaeva, B. S., et al., Mathematical Model of the Solar Combined Cycle Power Plant using Phase Change Materials in Thermal Energy Storage System (Thermodynamic Analysis), International Journal of Thermofluids, 22 (2024), 100579
  28. Kahe, S., et al., Water-Energy Nexus in the Combined Cycle Power Plant Using Energy, Exergy, Economic and Environmental Analyses, Energy Conversion and Management, 293 (2023), 117493
  29. ***, Steag Ebsilon, www.ebsilon.com/en/
  30. Ahrenfeldt, J., et al., Validation of a Continuous Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Operation of a Two-Stage Biomass Gasifier, Energy & Fuels, 20 (2006), 6, pp. 2672-2680

2025 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence