THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Snežana P. Marković

,

Ljubo P. Marković

,

Mirjana J. Miletić

,

Rada M. Radulović

,

Ružica T. Božović

ENHANCING SUSTAINABLE FACADE DESIGN: A BELGRADE CASE STUDY

ABSTRACT
This research examines the potential of widespread façade systems to improve energy performance and enhance user comfort in residential buildings. Utilizing Design Builder software (Version 5.0.3.7), the study specifically aimed to reduce heating energy consumption, a significant concern in the climatic conditions of Serbia. The methodology incorporated both technical performance assessments and economic analyses, evaluating the economic viability through metrics such as return on investment, Net present value, and internal rate of return. The multi-criteria evaluation framework employed allowed for a comprehensive analysis, balancing technical performance with economic and qualitative factors to identify the most favorable façade systems. By addressing both the immediate economic returns and longer-term benefits, this research contributes to a more sustainable and economically feasible building practice.
KEYWORDS
glazing systems, façades, residential buildings, energy performance, cost benefit analysis
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-05-20
PAPER REVISED: 2024-09-03
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-09-05
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2024-10-12
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI240520218M
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2025, VOLUME 29, ISSUE Issue 2, PAGES [999 - 1014]
REFERENCES
  1. Azizi, S., et al., Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures in Renovation of Single-Family Houses: A Comparative Approach, Energies, 13 (2020), 22, 6042
  2. Kosanović, S., et al., Energy Refurbishment of Family Houses in Serbia in Line with the Principles of Circular Economy, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 10, 5463
  3. Sassi, P., Strategies for Sustainable Architecture, in: Strateg. Sustain. Archit., Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK, 2006, pp. 1-305
  4. Keitsch, M., Sustainable Architecture, Design and Housing, Sustain. Dev., 20 (2012), 3, pp. 141-145
  5. Pohl, J., Sustainable Architecture Concepts and Principles, in: Build. Sci., Wiley, New York, USA, 2011, pp. 225-258
  6. Maddaus, M. L.. et al., Innovative Water Conservation Supports Sustainable Housing Development, J. Am. Water Work. Assoc., 100 (2008), 5, 2008
  7. Pohl, J., Concepts and Applications, in: Build. Sci., Wiley, New York, USA, 2011
  8. Mitchell, L., Burton, M., Neighbourhoods for Life: Designing Dementia-Friendly Outdoor Environments, Qual. Ageing Older Adults, 7 (2006), 1, pp. 26-33
  9. Moomaw, W. R., et al., Sustainable Development Diplomacy: Diagnostics for the Negotiation and Implementation of Sustainable Development, Glob. Policy, 8 (2017), 1, pp. 73-81
  10. Schulz, U., et al., Some Recent Trends in Research and Technology of Advanced Thermal Barrier Coatings, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 7 (2003), 1, pp. 73-80
  11. Nguyen, S. T., et al., Advanced Thermal Insulation and Absorption Properties of Recycled Cellulose Aerogels, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 445 (2014), Mar., pp. 128-134
  12. Hu, F., et al., Hollow-Structured Materials for Thermal Insulation, Adv. Mater., 31 (2019), 38, 1801001
  13. Cuce, E., Riffat, S. B., A State-of-the-Art Review on Innovative Glazing Technologies, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 41 (2015), Jan., pp. 695-714
  14. Huang, J., et al., Thermal Performance Optimization of Envelope in the Energy-Saving Renovation of Existing Residential Buildings, Energy Build., 247 (2021), 111103
  15. Brown, M., Innovative Energy-Efficiency Policies: An International Review, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ., 4 (2015), 1, pp. 1-25
  16. Lopez-Ochoa, L. M., et al., Energy Renovation of Residential Buildings in Cold Mediterranean Zones Using Optimized Thermal Envelope Insulation Thicknesses: The Case of Spain, Sustain., 12 (2020), 6, 2287
  17. Ferreira, M., et al., Cost-Optimal Energy Efficiency Levels Are the First Step in Achieving Cost Effective Renovation in Residential Buildings with a Nearly-Zero Energy Target, Energy Build., 133 (2016), Dec., pp. 724-737
  18. Bertoldi, P., et al., How to Finance Energy Renovation of Residential Buildings: Review of Current and Emerging Financing Instruments in the EU, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ., 10 (2021), 1, e384
  19. Achintha, M., Sustainability of Glass in Construction, in: Sustain. Constr. Mater., Woodhead Publishing, Samston, UK, 2016, pp. 79-104
  20. Lu, J. X., Poon, C. S., Recycling of Waste Glass in Construction Materials, in: New Trends Eco-Efficient Recycl. Concr., Woodhead Publishing, Samston, UK, 2018, pp. 153-167
  21. Stevanović, S., Optimization of Passive Solar Design Strategies: A Review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 25 (2013), Sep., pp. 177-196
  22. Grewal, K. S., et al., Decision-Making Method to Prioritize and Implement Solar Strategies on Neighborhood Level, Energy Reports, 12 (2024), Dec., pp. 2062-2076
  23. Athieniti, A. K., Santamouris, M., Thermal Analysis and Design of Passive Solar Buildings, Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK, , 2013, 296
  24. Ghazi, S., Ip, K., The Effect oof Weather Conditions on the Efficiency of PV Panels in the Southeast of UK, Renew. Energy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020, Vol. 6, pp. 50-59
  25. Jovanović Popović, M., et al., Atlas porodičnih kuća Srbije (Atlas of Family Hosuseing in Serbia - in Serbian), Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Belgrade, Serbia, 2012
  26. Pawar, B. S., Kanade, G. N., Energy Optimization of Building Using Design Builder Software, International Journal of New Technology and Research, 4 (2018), 1
  27. Mouter, N., et al., Comparing Cost-Benefit Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis, in: Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020, Vol. 6, pp. 225-254
  28. Mishan, E. J., Quah, E., Cost-Benefit Analysis, 6th ed., Routledge, London, UK, 2020
  29. Ekardt, F., Cost-Benefit Analysis without Convincing Theoretical Basis, Part in: Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics, Part of: Environmental Humanities: Transformation, Governance, Ethics, Law, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2022
  30. Elariane, S. A., Dube, J., Is Smart Housing a Good Deal, An Answer Based on Monte Carlo Net Present Value Analysis, Sustainability, 11 (2019), 15, 4193
  31. Kan, I., et al., The Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis Methods in Health Care: A Literature Review, Medical Decision Making, 42 (2022), 2, pp. 262-274
  32. Todorović, M., Rajčić, A., Priručnik za energetsku sertifikaciju zgrada - Vodič za investiture, izvođače i projektante (Handbook for Energy Certification of Buildings - Guide to Investments, Coutractors, and Designers - in Serbian), Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Belgrade, Serbia, 2017
  33. Мarković, Lj., et al., Multi-Criteria Decision-Making when Choosing Variant Solution of Highway Route at the Level of Preliminary Design, FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series Architecture and Civil Engineering, 11 (2013), 1, pp. 71-87
  34. Opricović, S., Tzeng, G. H., Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking, European Journal of Operational Research, 178 (2007), 2, pp. 514-529
  35. +++, Делпхи метода - шта је то, дефиниција и концепт | Речник 2024 (no date). Available at: sr.economy-pedia.com/11038201-delphi-method, 2024
  36. Harmathy, N., Analysis of Smart Building Solutions for Optimizing the Energy, Thermal Science, 26 (2022), 4A, pp. 3119-3132
  37. +++, International Energy Outlook 2016 With Projections to 2040 (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOV, www.osti.gov/biblio/1296780, 2024
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Enhancing sustainable facade design: A Belgrade case study

2025 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence