THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links

Zhenliang Wei

,

Hongtao Kao

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF CO-COMBUSTION OF BIOMASS AND PULVERIZED COAL IN A PRECALCINER

ABSTRACT
As high energy consumption and pollution increase in the cement industry, utilizing biomass as a substitute fuel has been deemed a promising energy-saving and emission reduction measure. Currently, research on the mixed burning of coal and biomass has mostly been done at the experimental level, providing limited guidance for actual production. Therefore, this paper investigates the mixed burning of coal fines and corn straw in a TTF-type precalciner by combining real production data and CFD numerical simulation methods. The influences of different corn straw blending ratios on the performance of precalciner are explored. The results show that, compared with non-corn straw, as the blending ratio of corn straw increases, the high temperature zone inside the precalciner significantly shrinks. The maximum temperature of the furnace decreases to 1370 K, the export raw material’s decomposition rate decreases to 83.92%, and the concentration of NO drops to 464 ppm when 40% corn straw is blended. After comprehensive consideration, it is found more suitable to mix 30% corn straw. Compared to experimental studies, this study has more practical guidance significance for cement enterprises seeking to utilize biomass alternative fuels.
KEYWORDS
biomass, alternative fuel, Mixed combustion, precalciner, numerical simulation
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2024-07-22
PAPER REVISED: 2024-09-18
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2024-11-01
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2024-12-07
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI240722263W
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2025, VOLUME 29, ISSUE Issue 2, PAGES [1643 - 1656]
REFERENCES
  1. Ali, M. B., et al., A Review on Emission Analysis in Cement Industries, Renewable and Sustainable En­ergy Reviews, 15 (2011), 5, pp. 2252-2261
  2. Andrew, R. M., Global CO2 Emissions from Cement Production, Earth System Science Data, 10 (2018), 1, pp. 195-217
  3. Zheng, C., et al., Characteristics of CO2 and Atmospheric Pollutant Emissions from China's Cement In­dustry: A Life-Cycle Perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 282 (2021), 124533
  4. Wu, H., et al., Experimental Investigation of Cutting Nitrogen Oxides Emission from Cement Kilns Using Coal Preheating Method, Journal of Thermal Science, 30 (2021), 4, pp. 1097-1107
  5. Kapitonov, I. A., et al., Development of Experience in the Application of Technologies in the Field of Al­ternative Energy: World Experience, Russian Practice, Renewable Energy, 165 (2021), Part 1, pp. 773-782
  6. Pedersen, M. N., et al., Imaging of Flames in Cement Kilns to Study the Influence of Different Fuel Types, Energy & Fuels, 31 (2017), 10, pp. 11424-11438
  7. Kanevce, G., et al., Optimal Usage of Biomass for Energy Purposes Toward Sustainable Development - A Case of Macedonia, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), Suppl. 1, pp. S77-S91
  8. Sotoude, M. Y., et al., Analysis of Steady and Oscillating Flames Fueled by Biomass Particles and Syn­gases Considering Two-Step Pyrolysis and Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Reactions, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47 (2022), 51, pp. 21841-21862
  9. Li, P., et al., Biological Pretreatment of Corn Straw for Enhancing Degradation Efficiency and Biogas Production, Bioengineered, 11 (2020), 1, pp. 251-260
  10. Ren, J., et al., Methanation of Syngas from Biomass Gasification: An Overview, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45 (2020), 7, pp. 4223-4243
  11. Galina, N. R., et al., Comparative Study on Combustion and Oxy-Fuel Combustion Environments Using Mixtures of Coal with Sugarcane Bagasse and Biomass Sorghum Bagasse by the Thermogravimetric Analysis, Journal of the Energy Institute, 92 (2019), 3, pp. 741-754
  12. Yi, B., et al., Investigation on the Co-Combustion Characteristics of Multiple Biomass and Coal under O2/CO2 Condition and the Interaction between Different Biomass, Journal of Environmental Management, 325 (2023), 116498
  13. Sun, J., et al., Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Biomass Co-Firing in a 300 MW Pulverized Coal Furnace, Thermal Science, 26 (2022), 5B, pp. 4179-4191
  14. Jeong, H. M., et al., Pyrolysis Kinetics of Coking Coal Mixed with Biomass under Non-Isothermal and Isothermal Conditions, Bioresource Technology, 155 (2014), Mar., pp. 442-445
  15. Li, L., et al., Release of Sulfur and Nitrogen during Co-Pyrolysis of Coal and Biomass under Inert Atmo­sphere, ACS Omega, 5 (2020), 46, pp. 30001-30010
  16. Yuan, Y., et al., Co-Combustion Behavior, Kinetic and Ash Melting Characteristics Analysis of Clean Coal and Biomass Pellet, Fuel, 324 (2022), Part C, 124727
  17. Mikulčić, H., et al., Numerical Study of Co-Firing Pulverized Coal and Biomass Inside A Cement Calcin­er, Waste Management & Research, 32 (2014), 7, pp. 661-669
  18. Ghenai, C., Janajreh, I., The CFD Analysis of the Effects of Co-Firing Biomass with Coal, Energy Con­version and Management, 51 (2010), 8, pp. 1694-1701
  19. Wang, X., et al., Numerical Study of Biomass co-Firing under Oxy-MILD mode, Renewable Energy, 146 (2020), Feb., pp. 2566-2576
  20. Jia, X., et al., Investigation of the Pollutant Emission Characteristics of Blends of Biomass and Coal Gangue in a Fluidized Bed, Thermal Science, 26 (2022), 5B, pp. 4333-4343
  21. Black, S., et al., Effects of Firing Coal and Biomass under Oxy-Fuel Conditions in a Power Plant Boiler Using CFD Modelling, Fuel, 113 (2013), Nov., pp. 780-786
  22. Kim, J., et al., Improvement in Reactivity and Pollutant Emission by Cofiring of Coal and Pretreated Biomass, Energy & Fuels, 33 (2019), 5, pp. 4331-4339
  23. Oladejo, J., et al., Biomass Constituents' Interactions with Coal during co-Firing, Energy Procedia, 158 (2019), Feb., pp. 1640-1645
  24. Chansa, O., et al., Study of the Kinetic Behaviour of Biomass and Coal during Oxyfuel co-Combustion, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28 (2020), 7, pp. 1796-1804
  25. Mei, S., et al., Numerical Simulation of the Complex Thermal Processes in a Vortexing Precalciner, Ap­plied Thermal Engineering, 125 (2017), Oct., pp. 652-661
  26. Cai, R., et al., Recent Advances in High-Fidelity Simulations of Pulverized Coal Combustion, Advanced Powder Technology, 31 (2020), 7, pp. 3062-3079
  27. Williams, J. J. R., Free-Surface Simulations Using an Interface-Tracking Finite-Volume Method with 3-D Mesh Movement, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 1 (2007), 1, pp. 49-56
  28. Corcoles, J. I., et al., Influence of Corrugation Shape on Heat Transfer Performance in Corrugated Tubes Using Numerical Simulations, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 137 (2019), Mar., pp. 262-275
  29. Ophoff, C., et al., A Numerical Study on Particle Tracking and Heat Transfer Enhancement in a Solar Cavity Receiver, Applied Thermal Engineering, 180 (2020), 115785
  30. Shuang, Y., et al., Heat Transfer Inside Particles and Devolatilization for Coal Pyrolysis to Acetylene at Ultrahigh Temperatures, Energy & Fuels, 24 (2010), 5, pp. 2991-2998
  31. Choi, C. R., Kim, C. N., Numerical Investigation on the Flow, Combustion and NOx Emission Character­istics in a 500 MWe Tangentially Fired Pulverized-Coal Boiler, Fuel, 88 (2009), 9, pp. 1720-1731
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Numerical simulation of co-combustion of biomass and pulverized coal in a precalciner

2025 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence