International Scientific Journal


A mathematical model approach was employed to simulate olive pomace gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. To validate the model a set of gasification experiments were performed in a 250 kWth quasi-industrial gasifier. The cold gas efficiency of the gasifier and tar production were evaluated to assess the energy potential of olive pomace while determining its most suitable end-use applications. A techno-economic analysis addressing the comparison of two different commercially manufactured gasifying unit sizes (100 kW and 1000 kW) and a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis were employed to assess both the feasibility of each application size and also foresee the main investment risks in conducting olive pomace gasification in small rural facilities. Olive pomace gasification showed to be more suitable for personal household purposes. The low cold gas efficiency (around 20%) makes this producer gas more appropriate for small cogeneration facilities applications. The use of olive pomace residues in gasification showed viable economic performance in small cogeneration solutions at a scale of 1000 kW for agriculture waste-to-energy recovery in olive oil agriculture cooperatives, while 100 kW showed to be unable to reach an economically sustainable scenario. Final remarks point out that despite the feasibility of the venture at a scale of 1000 kW special concerns must be considered regarding the study attractiveness to potential investors.
PAPER REVISED: 2019-10-10
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2019-10-21
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2019, VOLUME 23, ISSUE Supplement 5, PAGES [S1487 - S1498]
  1. GPP - Gabinete de Planeamento, Políticas e Administração Geral. Ficha de internacionalização, Azeite, 2017.
  2. Almeida, A., et al., Effect of temperature on the gasification of olive bagasse particles, Journal of the Energy Institute, In Press. (2017),
  3. Figueiredo, F., et al., Avaliação de Ciclo de Vida do Azeite e Óleos Vegetais, 2014.
  4. International Olive Council, Market Newsletter No 114 - March, 2017.
  5. Guizani, C., et al., Combustion characteristics and kinetics of torrefied olive pomace, Energy, 107. (2016), pp. 453-463
  6. Jeguirim, M., et al., Devolatilization behavior and pyrolysis kinetics of potential Tunisian biomass fuels, Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 33. (2014), 4, pp. 1452-1458
  7. Carvalho, T., Gaseificação Térmica de Resíduos Sólidos da Indústria do Azeite, Master Thesis, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 2012.
  8. Wang, Z., et al., Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Raw and Treated Olive Waste, Thermal Science. (2018),
  9. Hinge, J., Unexploited biomass sources, availability and combustion properties - D5.1 European Union, 2011.
  10. Jankes, G.G., et al., Biomass Gasification with CHP Production A Review of the State-of-the-Art Technology and Near Future Perspectives, Thermal Science, 16. (2012), pp. 115-130
  11. Venugopal, D., et al., Energy, Exergy and Sustainability Analysis of Rice Husk Air Gasification Process, Thermal Science. (2018),
  12. Kumar, A., et al., Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology, Energies, 2. (2009), 3, pp. 556-581
  13. Trninić, M., Modeling and Optimisation of corn cob Pyrolysis, PhD, Belgrade University Belgrade, 2015.
  14. Whitty, K.J., et al., Emissions from Syngas Combustion, Combustion Science and Technology, 180. (2008), 6, pp. 1117-1136, DOI No. 10.1080/00102200801963326
  15. Almeida, A., et al., Effect of temperature on the gasification of olive bagasse particles, Journal of the Energy Institute, In Press. (2017),
  16. Puig-Gamero, M., et al., Synergestic effect in the steam co-gasification of olive pomace, coal and petcoke: Thermogravimetric-mass spectrometric analysis, Energy Conversion and Management, 159. (2018), pp. 140-150
  17. Castro, C., et al., Potential of exhausted olive pomace for gasification, WASTES: Solutions, Treatments and Opportunities II, C. Vilarinho, et al., Editors. 2018, CRC Press. p. 437-442.
  18. Cardoso, J., et al., Techno-economic analysis of a biomass gasification power plant dealing with forestry residues blends for electricity production in Portugal, Journal of Cleaner Production, 212. (2019), pp. 741-753
  19. Silva, V., et al., Analysis of Syngas Quality from Portuguese Biomasses: An Experimental and Numerical Study, Energy & Fuels, 28. (2014), pp. 5766-77
  20. Zhou, C., et al., Selection of dolomite bed material for pressurized biomass gasification in BFB, Fuel Processing Technology, 159. (2017), pp. 460-473
  21. Cardoso, J., et al., Hydrodynamic Modelling of Municipal Solid Waste Residues in a Pilot Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor, Energies, 10. (2017), 11, p. 17773
  22. Cardoso, J., et al., Comparative scaling analysis of two different sized pilot-scale fluidized bed reactors operating with biomass substrates, Energy, 151. (2018), pp. 520-535
  23. Couto, N., et al., From laboratorial to pilot fluidized bed reactors: Analysis of the scale-up phenomenon, Energy Conversion and Management, 119. (2016), pp. 177-186
  24. Couto, N., et al., Municipal solid waste gasification in semi-industrial conditions using air-CO2 mixtures, Energy, 104. (2016), pp. 42-52
  25. Couto, N., et al., Assessment on steam gasification of municipal solid waste against biomass substrates, Energy Conversion and Management, 124. (2016), pp. 92-103
  26. Couto, N., et al., An experimental and numerical study on the Miscanthus gasification by using a pilot scale gasifier, Renewable Energy, 109. (2017), pp. 248-261
  27. Bermudez, J.M.,B. Fidalgo, Production of bio-syngas and bio-hydrogen via gasification, in: Handbook of Biofuels Production, Woodhead Publishing. 2016, pp. 431-494.
  28. Basu, P., Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction, 2018.
  29. Borello, D., et al., Thermo-Economic Assessment of a olive pomace Gasifier for Cogeneration Applications, Energy Procedia, 75. (2015), pp. 252-258
  30. Borello, D., et al., Modeling and Experimental Study of a Small Scale Olive Pomace Gasifier for Cogeneration: Energy and Profitability Analysis, Energies, 10. (2017), p. 1930
  31. Sara, H., et al., Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production using biomass gasification - A small scale power plant study, Energy Procedia, 101. (2016), pp. 806-813
  32. World Bank, International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group. Converting Biomass to Energy. A Guide for Developers and Investors, 2017.
  33. Bilek, E., et al., Fuel to Burn: Economics of Converting Forest Thinnings to Energy Using BioMax in Southern Oregon. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Services. Technical Report No.: FPL-GTR-157, 2005.
  34. Sadhukhan, J., et al., Heat Integration Strategy for Economic Production of Combined Heat and Power from Biomass Waste, Energy & Fuels, 23. (2009), 10, pp. 5106-5120
  35. Lamers, P., et al., Techno-economic analysis of decentralized biomass processing depots, Bioresources Technology, 194. (2015), pp. 205-213

© 2022 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence