International Scientific Journal


Cavitation is a common phenomenon in components of fluid machinery and it may induce material damage and vibration. A more accurate and commercial turbulence model is required to predict cavitation. In this paper, we make a combination of filter-based model (FBM) and density correction method (DCM) to propose a new DCM FBM. Firstly, the new DCM FBM and the homogeneous cavitation model are validated by comparing the simulation result with the experiment of cavitation shedding flow around the Clark-y hydrofoil and the filter size is determined as well. Then, the cavitation pattern cycle and shedding vortex structure of the twist hydrofoil experimented by Delft University of Technology were predicted using the DCM FBM. The predicted 3-D cavitation structures and development cycle of twist hydrofoil as well as the collapsing features show a good qualitative agreement with the high speed photography results. Numerical results show that the improved turbulence model could predict the cloud cavity evolution well, including the cloud cavity generation, shedding and dissipation. It is found that the re-entrant jet induced by the by adverse pressure gradient is the main reason to generate the cloud cavity shedding. The secondary shedding is al-so observed which is result from the combination of the radially advancing re-entrant jet and side-entrant jet simulated by the DCM FBM turbulence method.
PAPER REVISED: 2017-05-18
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2017-10-17
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2018, VOLUME 22, ISSUE Issue 4, PAGES [1629 - 1636]
  1. Launder, B., Sharma, B., Application of the Energy-Dissipation Model of Turbulence to the Calculation of Flow Near a Spinning Disc, Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1 (1974), 2, pp. 131-137
  2. Menter, F., et al., Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model, Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 4 (2003), 1, pp. 625-632
  3. Coutier-Delgosha, O., et al., Simulation of Unsteady Cavitation with a Two-Equation Turbulence Model Including Compressibility Effects*, Journal of Turbulence, 3 (2002), 1, pp. 58-65
  4. Coutier]Delgosha, O., et al., Numerical Simulation of the Unsteady Behaviour of Cavitating Flows, In-ternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 42 (2003), 5, pp. 527-548
  5. Coutier-Delgosha, O., et al., Analysis of Cavitating Flow Structure by Experimental and Numerical In-vestigations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 578 (2007), May, pp. 171-222
  6. Leroux, J. B., et al., A Joint Experimental and Numerical Study of Mechanisms Associated to Instability of Partial Cavitation on Two-Dimensional Hydrofoil, Physics of Fluids, 17 (2005), 5, 052101
  7. Ji, B.,et al., Three-Dimensional Large Eddy Simulation and Vorticity Analysis of Unsteady Cavitating Flow around a Twisted Hydrofoil, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 4 (2013), 25, pp. 510-519
  8. Luo, X., et al., Numerical Simulation of Cavity Shedding from a Three-Dimensional Twisted Hydrofoil and Induced Pressure Fluctuation by LES, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 4 (2012), 134, 041202
  9. Johansen, S. T., et al., Filter-Based Unsteady RANS Computations, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 1 (2004), 25, pp. 10-21
  10. Schumann, U., Subgrid Scale Model for Finite Difference Simulations of Turbulent Flows in Plane Channels and Annuli, Journal of Computational Physics, 4 (1975), 18, pp. 376-404
  11. Reboud, J., et al., Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Cavitating Flows: Some Applications and Open Problems, Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Cavitation, Osaka, Japan, 2003, pp. 1-10
  12. Foeth, E., et al., Time Resolved PIV and Flow Visualization of 3D Sheet Cavitation, Experiments in Flu-ids, 4 (2006), 40, pp. 503-513
  13. Foeth, E.-J., van Terwisga, T., An Attached Cavity on a Three-Dimensional Hydrofoil, Procedings, CAV2006, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2006
  14. Li, Z., Assessment of Cavitation Erosion with a Multiphase Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Method, Ph. D. thesis,, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Nederland, 2012
  15. Ji, B.,et al., Unsteady Cavitating Flow around a Hydrofoil Simulated Using the Partially-Averaged Na-vier-Stokes Model, Chinese Physics Letters, 29 (2012), 7, 076401
  16. Coutier-Delgosha, O., et al., Evaluation of the Turbulence Model Influence on the Numerical Simula-tions of Unsteady Cavitation, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1 (2003), 125, pp. 38-45
  17. Foeth, E. J., The Structure of Three-Dimensional Sheet Cavitation, Mechanical Maritime & Materials Engineering, 4 (2008), 24, pp. 125-137
  18. Bensow, R. E., Simulation of the Unsteady Cavitation on the the Delft Twist 11 foil using RANS, DES and LES, Proceedings, 2nd Int. Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, 2011
  19. Li, D. Q., et al., Towards Numerical Prediction of Unsteady Sheet Cavitation on Hydrofoils, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 5 (2010), 22, pp. 741-746
  20. Ji, B., et al., Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Cavitating Turbulent Flow and Shedding Horse-Shoe Vor-tex Structure Around a Twisted Hydrofoil, Int. Journal of Multiphase Flow, 51 (2013), May, pp. 33-43
  21. Kubota, A., et al., Unsteady Structure Measurement of Cloud Cavitation on a Foil Section Using Condi-tional Sampling Technique, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2 (1989), 112, pp. 204-210

© 2023 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence