International Scientific Journal


A cost-effectiveness of a specific waste treatment technique is very important factor when making the decision to invest in a waste treatment facility. Waste treatment can bring economic benefit through the value of product: recycled materials, the compost, the generated electricity, or heat. However, the expected economic benefits depend on many factors: the investment costs and operating costs of the waste treatment facility, revenues, the market price of the product obtained by waste treatment etc. The investment and operating costs and the revenue also depend on the amount of treated waste. This paper presents a mathematical model for evaluation of cost-effectiveness in the waste treatment technique with ener-gy recovery depending on the amount of waste, i. e. evaluation the minimum amount of waste to be treated for a cost-effective waste treatment technique with energy recovery. To develop the mathematical model, a socio-economic analysis was used. The model is applied to calculate the lower limit of cost-effectiveness in the waste treatment techniques with energy recovery: incineration and anaerobic digestion, in the city of Nis, Serbia, as a case study. The obtained results show that the amount of waste currently generated in the city of Nis is not sufficient for the cost-effective incineration treatment, but with the currently available amount of waste, anaerobic digestion is the waste treatment that can be operated without losses in the city of Nis.
PAPER REVISED: 2016-09-15
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2016-09-19
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2016, VOLUME 20, ISSUE Supplement 5, PAGES [S1573 - S1584]
  1. Schuebeler, P., et al., Conceptual Framework for Municipal Solid Waste Management in Low-Income Countries, in: Urban Management Programme Working Paper No. 9, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 1996
  2. Parthan, S. R., et al., Cost Estimation for Solid Waste Management in Industrializing Regions - Prece-dents, Problems and Prospects, Waste Manage., 32 (2012), 3, pp. 584-594
  3. Massarutto, A., et al., Material and Energy Recovery in Integrated Waste Management Systems: A Life-Cycle Costing Approach, Waste Manage., 31 (2011), 9-10, pp. 2102-2111
  4. Athanassiou, M., Zabatinotou, A., Techno-Economic Assessment of Recycling Practices of Municipal Solid Waste in Cyprus, J. Clean Prod., 16 (2008), 4, pp. 1474-1483
  5. Murphy, J. D., et al., Technical/Economic/Environmental Analysis of Biogas Utilization, Appl. Energ., 77 (2004), 4, pp. 407-427
  6. Tonjes, D. J., Mallikarjun, S., Cost Effectiveness of Recycling: A System Model, Waste Manage., 33 (2013), 11, pp. 2548-2556
  7. Aye, L., Widjaya, E. R., Environmental and Economic Analyses of Waste Disposal Options for Tradi-tional Markets in Indonesia, Waste Manage., 26 (2006), 10, pp. 1180-1191
  8. Economopoulos, A. P., Techno-Economic Aspects of Alternative Municipal Solid Wastes Treatment Methods, Waste Manage., 30 (2010), 4, pp. 707-715
  9. Tsilemou, K., Panagiotakopoulos, D., Approximate Cost Function for Solid Waste Treatment Facilities, Waste Manage. Res., 24 (2006), 4, pp. 310-322
  10. Jamasb, T., Nepal, R., Issues and Options in Waste Management: A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Waste-to-Energy in the UK, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 54 (2010), 12, pp. 1341-1352
  11. Murphy, J. D., Power, N. M., A Technical, Economic and Environmental Comparison of Composting and Anaerobic Digestion of Biodegradable Municipal Waste, J. Environ. Sci. Heal., A, 41 (2006), 5, pp. 865-879
  12. Parthan, S. R., et al., Cost Function Analysis for Solid Waste Management: a Developing Country Expe-rience, Waste Manage Res., 30 (2012), 5, pp. 485-491
  13. Tomić, T., et al., Influence of Legislative Conditioned Changes in Waste Management on Economic Vi-ability of MSW-Fuelled District Heating System ‒ Case Study, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), 4, pp. 1105-1120
  14. Christensen, T. H., Solid Waste Technology & Management, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Lyngby, Den-mark, 2011
  15. Hogg, D., Costs for Municipal Waste Management in the EU, Final Report to Directorate General Envi-ronment, European Commission, Eunomia, Bristol, UK, 2001
  16. Murphy, J. D., McKeogh, E., Technological, Economic and Environmental Analysis of Energy Produc-tion from Municipal Solid Waste, Renew. Energ., 29 (2004), 7, pp. 1043-1057
  17. Braber, K., Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste: a Modern Waste Disposal Option on the Verge of Breakthrough., Biomass Bioenerg., 9 (1995), 1-5, pp. 365-376
  18. Bolzonella, D., et al., Semi-Dry Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Focusing on the Start-up Phase, Bioresource Technol., 86 (2003), 2, pp. 123-132
  19. ***, The World Bank, Municipal Solid Waste Incineration, Technical Guidance Report, Washington, D. C. 1999
  20. Schwanecke, R., Formulas and Nomograms for Use of the Technical Guide for Air Pollution Control (in German), Wasser, Luft und Betrieb, 20 (1976), 11, p. 607
  21. Buswell, A. M., Mueller, H. F., Mechanisms of Methane Fermentation, Ind. Eng. Chem., 44 (1952), 3, pp. 550-552
  22. ***, Friends of the Earth, More Job, Less Waste - Report, 2010, downloads/jobs_recycling.pdf
  23. ***, 2011 Census of Population, Household and Dwellings in Republic of Serbia, Age and Sex, data by settlements (in Serbian), Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, pp. 464-472, Belgrade, 2012
  24. ***, Local Waste Management Plan of City of Nis for Period 2011-2021 (in Serbian), City of Nis,
  25. Tchobanoglous, G., et al., Integrated Solid Waste Management - Engineering Principles and Manage-ment Issues, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, USA, 1993
  26. ***, Waste Management Strategy for Period 2010-2019 (in Serbian), Republic of Serbia, Official Ga-zette of Serbia, Belgrade, 29/2010
  27. ***, Decree on Incentives for the Production of Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources and Com-bined Production of Electricity and Heat (in Serbian), Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of Serbia 8/13, Belgrade, 2013
  28. Stefanović, G., Marković, D., Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Case Study of Nis, Serbia, Proceedings, 24th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Systems, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2011, pp. 3930-3937
  29. ***, Global Environmental Exchange, EU Emission Allowances, 2016,!/2016/06/13

© 2023 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence