THERMAL SCIENCE
International Scientific Journal
GREEN LIVING ROOF IMPLEMENTATION AND INFLUENCES OF THE SOIL LAYER ON ITS PROPERTIES
ABSTRACT
Affected by undeniable climatic change, the temperature of the urban areas rises continually, increasing rapidly the energy problem of cities and amplifying the pollution problems. The thermal stress is increased, thus both the indoor and the outdoor thermal comfort levels are decreased, enhancing the health problems. Green roof implementation in the building envelope is strategy that provides heat island amelioration, thermal comfort for occupants and reduces energy consump-tion of buildings. Green living roofs are a passive cooling technique, which can stop the incoming solar radiation from reaching the building structure below. In this paper, we assessed the importance of the green roofs in providing environ-mental and building energy benefits, and brief investigation on the different con-figuration of the soil layer in the green roof assembly influences to the tempera-ture of the roof surface was presented. Investigation was conducted for first phase of the living roof growth. Four cells were designed in SolidWorks software where the transient thermal study was performed in order to determine differences between the behavior of the conventional roof and three green roof types.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2016-04-21
PAPER REVISED: 2016-07-16
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2016-09-19
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2016-12-25
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR
2016, VOLUME
20, ISSUE
Supplement 5, PAGES [S1511 - S1520]
- Rose, L. S., et al., Characterizing the Fabric of the Urban Environment: a Case Study of Greater Hou-ston, Texas., Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-51448, Berkeley, Cal., USA, 2003
- Haemmerle, F., The Market for Green Roofs Continues to Grow (in German), in: Jahrbuch Dachbe-grunung, Roof-Greening Annual Report (Ed. K. Flubacher), Thalacker, Braunschweig, Germany, 2002, pp. 11-13
- Berardi, U., Ghaffarian, H. A., A Comprehensive Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Green Roofs, Applied Energy, 115 (2014), Feb., pp. 411-428
- Gettera, K. L., et al., Seasonal Heat Flux Properties of an Extensive Green Roof in a Midwestern U. S. Climate, Energy and Buildings, 43 (2011), 12, pp. 3548-3557
- Sailor, D. J., et al., Thermal Property Measurements for Ecoroof Soils Common in the Western U. S., Energy & Buildings, 40 (2008), 7, pp. 1246-1251
- Zhao, M., et al., Comparison of Green Roof Plants and Substrates Based on Simulated Green Roof Thermal Performance with Measured Material Properties, Proceedings, IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Chambery, France, 2013, pp. 817-823
- Yaghoobian, N., Srebrić, J., Influence of Plant Coverage on the Total Green Roof Energy Balance and Building Energy Consumption, Energy and Buildings, 103 (2015), Sep., pp. 1-13
- Yang X., et al., Temperature Decrease and Moisture Increase Effects of Parthenocissus Quinquefolia in Vertical Greening, Chinese Journal of Urban Environmental Ecology, 20 (2007), 6, pp. 1-3
- Wong N. H., et al., Investigation of Thermal Benefits of Rooftop Garden in the Tropical Environment, Building and Environment, 38 (2003), 2, pp. 261-270
- Zhao, H. L., et al., Effects of Three Different Green-Lands in Plantation Structure on the O2-Emitting, CO2-Fixing, Heat-Absorbing and Temperature-Decreasing in Residential Quarters, Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 20 (1999), 6, pp. 41-44
- Taib, N., et al., An Assessment of Thermal Comfort and Users' Perceptions of Landscape Gardens in a High-Rise Office Building, Journal of Sustainable Development, 3 (2010), 4, pp. 153-164
- Chalfoun, N., Patil, U., Thermal Comfort Assessment of a Green Roof at The College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture in Tucson, Arizona, International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 1 (2008), 4, pp. 55-70
- Teemusk, A., Mander, U., Green Roof Potential to Reduce Temperature fluctuations of a Roof Mem-brane: a case study from Estonia, Building and Environment, 44 (2009), 3, pp. 643-650
- Teemusk, A., Mander, U., Temperature Regime of Planted Roofs Compared with Conventional Roofing Systems, Ecological Engineering, 36 (2009), 1, pp. 91-95