THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

BUILDING ENVELOPE INFLUENCE ON THE ANNUAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE IN OFFICE BUILDINGS

ABSTRACT
The objective of the research is to determine the quantitative influence of building envelope on the annual heating and cooling energy demand in office buildings demonstrated on a reference office-tower building located in Novi Sad, Serbia. The investigation intended to find preferable and applicable solutions for energy performance improvement in currently inefficient office buildings. A comparative and evaluative analysis was performed among the heating energy expenses and simulated values from the multi-zone model designed in EnergyPlus engine. The research determines an improved window to wall ratio using dynamic daylight simulation and presents the influence of glazing parameters (U-value, Solar heat gain coefficient - SHGC) on the annual energy performance. Findings presented window to wall ratio reduction down to 30% and point out the significance of the SHGC parameter on the overall energy performance of buildings with high internal loads. The calculation of the air-ventilation energy demand according to EN 15251 is included respectively. Results offer effective methods for energy performance improvement in temperate climate conditions.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2014-11-11
PAPER REVISED: 2015-07-27
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2015-07-29
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2015-08-08
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI141111109H
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2016, VOLUME 20, ISSUE Issue 2, PAGES [679 - 693]
REFERENCES
  1. Eskin, N., Türkmen, H., Analysis of annual heating and cooling energy requirements for office buildings in different climates in Turkey, Energy and Buildings, 40 (2008), pp. 763-773
  2. Harmati, N., et al., Energy performance modelling and heat recovery unit efficiency assessment of an office building, Thermal Science, (2014), DOI No. 10.2298/TSCI140311102H
  3. Gvozdenac, D. D., et al., Serbian Energy Efficiency Problems, Thermal Science, 18 (2014), 3, pp. 683-694
  4. ***, Directive 2012/27/EU of 25 October 2012 on Energy Efficiency (amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (1)), Official Journal of the European Union, No. L 315, Vol. 55, pp. 1-56
  5. ***, Official gazette RS, no. 61/2011, Rules on conditions for the contents and manner of certificate issuance of energy performance for buildings (in Serbian), 2011
  6. Sartori, I., Hestnes, A.G., Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article, Energy and Buildings, 39 (2007), pp. 249-257
  7. Fumo, N., et al., Methodology to estimate building energy consumption using EnergyPlus Benchmark Models, Energy and Buildings, 42 (2010), pp. 2331-2337
  8. Yua, Y., et al., Synergization of air handling units for high energy efficiency in office buildings: Implementation methodology and performance evaluation, Energy and Buildings, 54 (2012), pp. 426-435
  9. Roetzel, A., et al., Impact of building design and occupancy on office comfort and energy performance in different climates, Building and Environment, 71 (2014), pp. 165-175
  10. Vučićević, B., et al., Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Thermal Performance of a Residential Buildings in Belgrade, Thermal Science, 13 (2009), 4, pp. 245-252
  11. Andjelković, V. B., et al., Thermal Mass Impact on Energy Performance of a low, medium, and heavy mass building in Belgrade, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), 2, pp. S447-S459
  12. Schlueter, A., Thesseling, F. Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stage, Automation in Construction, 18 (2009), pp. 153-163
  13. Maile, T., et al., A method to compare simulated and measured data to assess building energy performance, Building and Environment, 56 (2012), pp. 241-251
  14. Ma, P., et al., Maximum window to wall ratio of a thermally autonomous building as a function of envelope U-value and ambient temperature amplitude, Applied Energy, 146 (2015), pp.84-91
  15. Goia, F., et al., Optimizing the configuration of a façade module for office buildings by means of integrated thermal and lighting simulations in a total energy perspective, Applied Energy, 108 (2013), pp. 515-527
  16. ***, Meteonorm: meteonorm.com/en/downloads
  17. ***, The Republic Hydrometeorology Service of Serbia, Database for Novi Sad, 2013: www.hidmet.gov.rs/ciril/meteorologija/klimatologija_godisnjaci.php
  18. Magyar, Z., Harmati, N. Building energy performance evaluation from the comfort aspect, Proceedings, E-nova International conference, Pinkafeld, Austria, 2014 nov. 13-14.
  19. ***, Autodesk Revit: www.autodesk.com/products/revit-family/overview
  20. ***, Ecotect Analysis: usa.autodesk.com/ecotect-analysis/
  21. ***, Desktop Radiance: radsite.lbl.gov/deskrad/download.htm
  22. ***, Sketchup Make, www.sketchup.com
  23. ***, Open Studio: openstudio.nrel.gov
  24. ***, Energy Plus: apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus
  25. ***, Glass Performance: www.allweatherwindows.com/windows.php?sid=131
  26. ***, Building Component Library (BCL): bcl.nrel.gov/
  27. ***, ASHRAE Standard 189.1-2009, Standard for design of high-performance green buildings: www.ashrae.org/standards-research--technology/standards--guidelines
  28. European Standards: EN 15251 2007 Annex B; Basis for the criteria for indoor air quality and ventilation rates; Recommended design ventilation rates in non-residential buildings, pp. 32-35

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence