International Scientific Journal


Decision makers make decisions taking into account many different factors. That is why different experiences, living standard and other „non-technical“ conditions may lead to different decisions in different countries, or even regions of the same country. This paper deals with information gathered through a survey made among experts already dealing with different aspects of biomass use. Recognized factors influencing the wider use of biomass are arranged in a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) matrix. This matrix is used as a base to gather the opinions of the experts interviewed. Conclusions were made taking into account the most influential factors on the decision making process in biomass use according to the results. The questions of the survey were chosen according to existing results, as well as based on the authors’ own experience and estimated relevance to the situation of the country analyzed (Republic of Serbia). The survey analysis covered the responses of 62 national experts in this field. Based on the gathered data, a proper multi-criteria analysis was done using the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and ANP (Analytic Network Process) methods. Afterwards, recommendations and comments to the decision makers and developers of national energy strategies are presented.
PAPER REVISED: 2015-10-09
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2015-10-15
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2016, VOLUME 20, ISSUE Issue 2, PAGES [371 - 380]
  1. Brkić, M. J., et al., Assessment of Species and Quantity of Biomass in Serbia and Guidelines of Usage, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), Suppl. 1, pp. S79-S86
  2. Glavonjić, B. D., Oblak, L. Z., Consumption of Woody Biomass in Industry, Commercial, and Public Facilities in Serbia Present State and Possible Contribution to the Share of Renewable Sources in Final Energy Consumption, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), 1, pp. 7-19
  3. Radovanović, P. M., et al., Opportunities of Solid Renewable Fuels for (Co-)Combustion With Coal in Power Plants in Serbia, Thermal Science, 18 (2014), 2, pp. 631-644
  4. Vasiljević, A. Lj., Potentials for Forest Woody Biomass Production in Serbia, Thermal Science, 19 (2015), 2, pp. 397-410
  5. Gvozdenac, D., et al., Serbian Energy Efficiency Problems, Thermal Science, 18 (2014), 3, pp. 683-694
  6. Pusnik, M., et al., Role of the National Energy System Modeling in The Process of the Policy Development, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), 3, pp. 703-715
  7. Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Methods and Software, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, UK, 2003
  8. Miller, G. A., The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information, Psychological Review, 63 (1956), 2, pp. 81-97
  9. Saaty T. L., Vargas L. G., The Logic of Priorities, Springer-Science+Business Media, New York, USA, 1982
  10. Hill, T., Westbrook, R., SWOT Analysis: It's Time for a Product Recall, Long Range Planning, 30 (1997), 1, pp. 46-52
  11. Catron, et al., Bioenergy Development in Kentucky: A SWOT-ANP analysis, Forest Policy and Economics, 28 (2013), pp. 38-43
  12. Kurttila, M., et al., Utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in SWOT Analysis - a Hybrid Method and its Application to a Forest-Certification Case, Forest Policy and Economics, 1 (2000), pp. 41-52
  13. Saaty, T. L., A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, J. Math. Psychol., 15 (1977), pp. 234-281.
  14. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, Texas, USA, 1980
  15. Đaković, D., et al., Logistics of Supply of Energy Plant by Biomass (in Serbian), Proceedings, 27th International Congress on Process Engineering Procesing, Belgrade, Serbia, 2014
  16. Đaković, D., Gvozdenac Urošević, B., SWOT Analysis of Biomass Plant Supply Logistics, Proceedings (Ed. D. Gvozdenac),VIII Forum on Clean Energy Technologies, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2014
  17. Urošević, D., Gvozdenac Urošević, B., Comprehensive Analysis of a Straw-Fired Power Plant in the Province of Vojvodina, Thermal Science, 16 (2012), Suppl. 1, pp. S97-S106
  18. Hussain, D., et al., A Study of Textile & Clothing Supply Chain in Pakistan, Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010
  19. Yavuz, F., Baycan, T., Use of SWOT and Analytic Hierarchy Process Integration as a Participatory Decision Making Tool in Watershed Management, Procedia Technology, 8 (2013), pp. 134-143
  20. Hongshen, Z., Ming, C., Research on the Recycling Industry Development Model for Typical Exterior Plastic Components of End-of-Life Passenger Vehicle Based on the SWOT Method, Waste Management, 33 (2013), 11, pp. 2341-2353
  21. Kajanus, M., et al., Making Use of MCDS Methods in SWOT Analysis—Lessons learnt in Strategic Natural Resources Management, Forest Policy and Economics, 20 (2012), pp. 1-9
  22. Mehmood, F., et al., Analytical Investigation of Mobile NFC Adaption with SWOT-AHP Approach: A Case of Italian Telecom, Procedia Technology, 12 (2014), pp. 535-541
  23. Sevkli, M., et al., Development of a Fuzzy ANP Based SWOT Analysis for the Airline Industry in Turkey, Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (2012), 1, pp. 14-24
  24. Shariatmadari, M., et al., Using SWOT Analysis and SEM to Prioritize Strategies in Foreign Exchange Market in Iran, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99 (2013), pp. 886-892

© 2022 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence