ABSTRACT
The CANMET Energy Technology Centre (CETC), sponsored by Luscar Ltd. and the Alberta provincial government, carried out a series of combustion trials on a number of washery rejects to determine whether they could be burned in an environmentally acceptable manner using both conventional and fluidized bed combustion (FBC). The paper presents details of tests using CETC 0.8 MWth circulating fluidized bed combustor (CFBC). The starting bed material (silica sand) and fuel ash have very distinctive SiO2 and Al2O3 contents, therefore, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of the bed material may be used as an indicator of the chemical
steady state. The three fuels burned in the reactor were: raw coal (Obed #4), Obed Jig Rejects (Obed #7) and Obed Jig Middlings (Obed #10). These fuels required an additive, Cadomin limestone, to achieve the
allowable SO2 emission levels recommended under the Canadian National Guidelines for Stationary Sources. However, NOx levels were always below the allowable emission levels for all three fuels. Other emissions such as CO and N2O appeared to be low and unlikely to pose problems.
The combustion efficiency associated with these fuels was high, as might have been expected with a very reactive fuel, and at 850 °C was typically about 99%. Therefore, the CFBC technology appeared to be an entirely satisfactory technology for burning these fuels.
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2001-08-29
PAPER REVISED: 2001-09-15
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2001-12-16
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2020-08-22
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR
2000, VOLUME
4, ISSUE
Issue 2, PAGES [69 - 87]
- *** Utilization of Coal Washery Tailings Fluidized Bed Combustion Technology Applied to the Co-Generation of Coal Drying and Electrical Power, a Cooperative Study with Luscar Ltd., TransAlta Utilities Corporation and CANMET Energy Technology Centre
- Desai, D. L., The 0.8 MWth Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion Research Facility at the Combustion and Carbonization Research Laboratory, CANMET: Its Design and Initial Operating Experience, Proceedings, 1991 CANMET CFBC Management Seminar (Eds. E. J. Anthony, F. Preto), Halifax, Nova Scotia, July 2-3, 1991
- Schouten, J. C., van den Bleck, C. M., Sulfur Retention and NO, Reduction: the Sure Model in Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Coal Combustion: Research, Development and Applications (Ed. M. Valk), Elsevier, 1995
- Hamer, C. A., Evaluation of SO, Sorbent Utilization in Fluidized Beds, CANMET Report 86-9E, December 1986
- Zhang, J. Q., Jones, W. E., Evaluation of SO2 and NOx Emissions in Fluidized Bed Combustion, Final Report to Energy, Mines and Resources Under Contract 007SQ-234400-8-9213, August 1990
- Grace, J. R., Brereton, C. M. H., Lim, C. J., Legros, R., Zhao, J., Senior, R. C., Wu, R. L., Muir, J. M., Engman, R., Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion of Western Canadian Fuels, Final Report to Energy, Mines and Resources Canada under contract 52.8823440-7-9 136, August 1989
- Becker, H. A., Code, R. .K.. Stephenson, J. R., Pilot Scale Trials on Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustion of a Western Canadian Sub-Bituminous Coal (Highvale), Final Report to Energy, Mines and Resources Canada OQFBC.TR.87.3, March 1987
- Raymant, A. P., Sulphur Capture by Coal and Freeboard Processes During Fluidized Bed Combustion, Proceedings, Tenth International Conference on FBC (Ed. A. Manakcer), San Francisco, CA, April 30-May 3, 1989, pp. 597-602
- Goblirsch, G., Vander Molen, R. H., Wilson, K., Hajicek, D., Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustion Testing of North Dakota Lignite, Proceeding, Sixth International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, April 1980, pp. 850-862
- Stover, N.S. H., Anthony, E. J., Desai, D. L., Friedrich, F. D., Combustion Performance and Sulphur Capture During Fluid Bed Combustion of a Western Sub-Bituminous Coal and an Eastern Bituminous Coal, Winter Annual Meeting, ASME, 81-WA/Fu-5, November 15-20, 1981!
- La Nauze, R. D., Fundamentals of Coal Combustion in Fluidized Beds, Chemical Engineering Research & Design, Transaction of the Institute of Chemical Engineers, 63 (1985), 1, pp. 3-33
- Anthony, L. J., Fluidized Bed Combustion of Alternative Solid Fuels; Status, Successes and Problems of the Technology, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 21 (1995), pp. 239-268
- Kulaots, I., Ots, A., Sulphation of Estonian and Israel Oil Shale Ashes Under Atmospheric and Pressurized Combustion Systems, Oil Shale, 4 (1997), pp. 265-283
- Anthony, E. J., Granatstein, D. L., Sulphur Capture in Fluidized Bed Combustion", Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 27 (2001), pp. 215—-236
- Lyngfelt, A.. Leckner, B.. The Effect of Reductive Decomposition of CaSOy on Sulphur Capture in Fluidized Bed Boilers, Proceedings, 10'" International Conference on FBC (Ed. A. Manakcer), San Francisco, CA, April 30 — May 3, 1989, pp. 675-68
- Gavin, D.G., Dorrington, M. A., Factors in the Conversion of Fuel Nitrogen to Nitric and Nitrous Oxide During Fluidized Bed Combustion, Fuel, 72 (1993), pp. 381-388
- Preto, F., Anthony, E.J., Jia, L., Nitrous Oxide Formation in Power Plant Plumes, in: Clean Combustion Technology, Part A, Graga Carvalho, (Eds. M. Fivelands, W. A. Lockwood, P. Papadopoulos, C.), Gordon and Beach Science Publishers, 1999, pp. 233-246
- Leckner, B., Karlsson, M., Mjornell, M., Hagman, U., Emissions from a 165 MWth Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler". J. Inst. of Energy, pp. 122-130