International Scientific Journal

Thermal Science - Online First

online first only

Nozzle flow gas-dynamical properties under dome deflector TVC system effect

The paper discusses the gas-dynamical disturbances in the nozzle jet flow, discovered by numerical simulations, caused by mechanical-shaped jet obstacles, immersed in the exit area of the nozzle flow for thrust vector control purposes. External profiled tab shaped as a dome deflector is used to disturb the flow in the exit area, which provides the comprehensive 3-D nozzle separated flow zones with different high gradients of flow stream parameters. Discovered complexity of the flow pattern in the 3-D nozzle separated zone is exploited by complex computational fluid dynamics simulations and used for the numerical calculations, implemented by FLUENT commercial code. Pressure and temperature distributions data along the nozzle walls, as well as on the deflector wall, are used to estimate induced lateral and thrust forces by pressure integral. Induced forces estimated by numerical simulations and hot gases nozzle tests are compared as relative efficiency values to prove the quality of numerical simulations. Numerical calculations are carried out in the nozzle, obstacle, and the gap flows showed good agreement to the calculated and measured induced forces. The main aim of the developed method is to establish an approved calculation tool to compare and choose thrust vector control possibilities based on tabs with different forms of immersion in the external jets.
PAPER REVISED: 2018-09-07
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2018-09-10
  1. Zivković, S., et al., Experimental research and numerical simulations of thrust vector control nozzle flow, The Aeronautical Journal 120.1229 (2016),pp.1153-1174.
  2. Davidović, Nikola, et al., Contribution to research of spoiler and dome deflector TVC systems in rocket propulsion, Tehnički vjesnik 22.4 (2015), pp.907-915.
  3. Živković, S., et al., Experimental and simulation testing of thermal loading in the jet tabs of a thrust vector control system, Thermal Science 20.suppl. 1 (2016), pp.275-286.
  4. Gal-Or, Benjamin., Fundamental concepts of vectored propulsion, Journal of Propulsion and Power 6.6 (1990), pp.747-757.
  5. Yu, Man Sun, et al., Hybrid method for jet vane thermal analysis in supersonic nozzle flow, Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer 20.3 (2006), pp.614-617.
  6. Rainville, Pierre-Antoine, et al., Unsteady CFD calculation for validation of a multi-vane thrust vector control system, 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 2004.
  7. ***, Fluent Inc., FLUENT 5 User's Guide, 1998
  8. Rainville, Pierre-Antoine, et al., CFD Validation with Measured Temperatures and Forces for Thrust Vector Control, 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2002.
  9. Danielson, A. O., and M. R. Driels., Testing and Analysis of Heat Transfer in Materials Exposed to Non-Metallized HTPB Propellant, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey. Cal., USA (1992).
  10. Spence, Timothy M. Applications of infrared thermography in convective heat transfer. Diss. 1986.
  11. Sutton, George P., and Oscar Biblarz, Rocket propulsion elements, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  12. Branislav, Jojic, et al., Pressure distribution in rocket nozzle with mechanical system for TVC, 23rd Joint Propulsion Conference, 1987
  13. Stefanović, Z., Research of fluid flow and pressure distribution in supersonic nozzle in connection with vector thrust control, PhD thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Belgrade, 1986.
  14. Zivkovic, S., Thrust calculation methods in optimization process for thrust vector system (in Serbian), Proceedings of the 22nd Jugoslovenski Komitet za Eksplozivne Materije, October 2004, Bar, Montenegro.
  15. Gligorijević, Nikola, et al., Side force determination in the rocket motor thrust vector control system, Scientific Technical Review 63.2 (2013), pp.27-38.
  16. Kozic, M., and S. Ristic., Capability of two-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations for two-dimensional thrust vectoring nozzles., Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 224.8 (2010), pp.905-910.
  17. Zivković, S., et al., Experimental research and numerical simulations of thrust vector control nozzle flow., The Aeronautical Journal 120.1229 (2016), pp.1153-1174.
  18. Spiegel, Martin, et al., Tetrahedral vs. polyhedral mesh size evaluation on flow velocity and wall shear stress for cerebral hemodynamic simulation, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 14.01 (2011), pp.9-22.
  19. Marković, Zoran J., et al., Assessment results of fluid-structure interaction numerical simulation using fuzzy logic., Thermal Science 20.suppl. 1 (2016), pp.235-250.
  20. Yaravintelimath, Allamaprabhu, B. N. Raghunandan, and Jose A. Morinigo., Numerical prediction of nozzle flow separation: Issue of turbulence modeling, Aerospace Science and Technology 50 (2016), pp.31-43.
  21. Cvetinovic, Dejan B., et al., Review of the research on the turbulence in the laboratory for thermal engineering and energy, Thermal science 20.6 (2016) , pp.S1.
  22. Chang, P. K., Control of the flow separation, Hemisphere, Washington, 1977.
  23. Nauparac, Dragan B., et al., Different modeling technologies of hydraulic load simulator for thrust vector control actuator., Tehnički vjesnik 22.3 (2015), pp.599-606.
  24. Abramovič, G. N. Прикладная газовая динамика, Наука, Moscow, 1976.
  25. Krasnov, N. F. Метод аеродинамическог рашцота, Moskva, Machinostroenie, 1984.