THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Authors of this Paper

External Links

INVESTIGATION OF DECARBONIZATION POTENTIAL IN GREEN BUILDING DESIGN TO ACCELERATE THE UTILIZATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

ABSTRACT
The construction sector as one of the highest carbon emitters in the World has an international initiative for GHG reduction. Green building certifications demonstrate performance, efficiency and economy in the construction sector. The motivation of the research was to investigate whether Green certified buildings which fulfill the minimum energy standards do demonstrate high energy performance compared to energy efficient buildings and renewable systems. The hypothesis was to investigate that RES application could contribute to higher performance, against a typical efficient HVAC system (usually applied in commercial buildings) and a building aiming for Green certification, concerning mandatory energy efficiency requirement. The research scope was to investigate and evaluate various HVAC solutions using triple-criteria evaluation method for decarbonization: energy performance, carbon footprint, and operation cost to formulate systematic solutions in the design phase of projects for wide audience with preferable and applicable results.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2020-03-24
PAPER REVISED: 2020-05-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2020-05-07
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2020-06-07
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200324195H
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2021, VOLUME 25, ISSUE Issue 6, PAGES [4269 - 4282]
REFERENCES
  1. World Energy Council, www.worldenergy.org/data/resources/country/hungary/geothermal/
  2. National Office for Research and Technology , Hungarian National Environment Protection and Energy Center, nkfih.gov.hu/strategy/archive/in-hungary/research-and-development# accessed 2019
  3. ***, ASHRAE 90.1 2010 Standard. www.ashrae.org/resources Accessed 2017.
  4. ***, DOE EnergyPlus. energyplus.net/ Accessed 2018.
  5. ***, OpenStudio. www.openstudio.net/ Accessed 2018.
  6. ***, ASHRAE Climate Design Conditions, ashrae-meteo.info/index.php Accessed 2018.
  7. ***, EnergyPlus Weather Data by Region, energyplus.net/weather-region/europe_wmo_region_6
  8. ***, Hungarian 7/2006 TNM energy efficiency regulation for buildings, net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=A0600007.TNM accessed 2019.
  9. Kmekováa, J., Energy efficient retrofit and life cycle assessment of an apartment building, Energy Procedia, 78 (2015), pp. 3186-3191, DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.778
  10. Sacht, H., et al., Glazing daylighting performance and trombe wall thermal performanceof a modular facade system in four different Portuguese cities, Indoor and Built Environment, 24 (2015), 4, pp. 544-563, DOI: 10.1177/1420326X14525976
  11. Huang, W., et al., A novel single-well geothermal system for hot dry rock geothermal energy exploitation, Energy, 162 (2018), pp. 630-644
  12. Jiangjiang W., et al., Adjustable performance analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with ground source heat pump, Energy, 163 (2018), pp. 475-489
  13. Zhang, J., et al., A successful delivery process of green buildings: The project owners' view, motivation and commitment, Renewable Energy, 138 (2019), pp. 651-658
  14. Gan, G., et al., Dynamic thermal performance of horizontal ground source heat pumps - The impact of coupled heat and moisture transfer, Energy, 152 (2018), pp. 877-887
  15. Zhu, N., et al., Performance analysis of ground water-source heat pump system with improved control strategies for building retrofit, Renewable Energy, 80 (2015), pp. 324-330
  16. Liu, Z., et al., Performance and feasibility study of hybrid ground source heat pump system assisted with cooling tower for one office building, Energy 173 (2019), pp. 28-37
  17. Vanaga, R., et al., Solar facade module for nearly zero energy building, Energy 157 (2018), pp. 1025-1034
  18. Togashia, E., et al., Development of building thermal environment emulator to evaluate the performance of the HVAC system operation, Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12 (2019), 5, pp. 663-684
  19. Amin, U., et al., Performance analysis of an experimental smart building: Expectations and outcomes, Energy, 135 (2017), pp. 740-753
  20. Wolisz, H., et al., Cost optimal sizing of smart buildings' energy system components considering changing end-consumer electricity markets, Energy, 137 (2017), pp. 715-728
  21. Pavlak, G., et al., Evaluating synergistic effect of optimally controlling commercial building thermal mass portfolios, Energy, 84 (2015), pp. 161-176
  22. Harmathy, N., et al., Multi-criterion optimization of building envelope in the function of indoor illumination quality towards overall energy performance improvement." Energy. 114. pp. 302-317. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.162
  23. Gang, W., et al., Robust optimal design of building cooling systems considering cooling load uncertainty and equipment reliability." Applied Energy. 159. pp. 265-275. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.070
  24. Krstic-Furundzic, A., et al., Assessment of energy and environmental performance of office building models: A case study, Energy and Buildings, 115 (2016), pp. 11-22, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.050
  25. Eui-Jong, K., et al., Urban energy simulation: simplification and reduction of building envelope models, Energy and Buildings, 84 (2014) pp. 193-202, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.066
  26. Pantović, V. S., et al., Rising Public Awareness of Energy Efficiency of buildings enhanced by "smart" controls of the in-door environment, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), 4, pp. 1307-1319
  27. Turanjanin, V. M., et al., Different Heating Systems for Single Family House Energy and Economic Analysis, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), 1, pp. S309-S320
  28. Ignjatović, M. G., et al., Sensitivity analysis for daily building operation from the energy and thermal comfort standpoint, Thermal Science, 20 (2016), 5, pp. 1485-1500
  29. Roel C.G.M., et al., Review of current status, requirements and opportunities for building performance simulation of adaptive facades, Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10 (2017), 2, pp. 205-223
  30. Urbancl D., et al., Geothermal heat potential - the source for heating greenhouses in Southestern Europe, Thermal science, 20 (2016), 4, pp. 1-11
  31. Harmathy, N., et al., Energy Performance Modelling and Heat Recovery Unit Efficiency Assessment of an Office Building, Thermal science, 19 (2015), 3, pp. 865-880
  32. ***, HUN GB data, www.hugbc.hu/minositett-epuletek-adatbazis, Accessed 2019 (in Hungarian)
  33. ***, Meteonorm, www.meteonorm.com/ accessed 2015
  34. ***, EnergyPlus Engineering Reference, energyplus.net Accessed 2018
  35. ***, Energy Efficiency Regulation, TNM 7/2006, net.jogtar.hu Accessed 2019 (in Hungarian)
  36. ***, USGBC, LEED, www.usgbc.org Accessed 2019
  37. ***, Gas tariff, www.nkmenergia.hu/foldgaz/Egyetemes-Szolgaltatas (in Hungarian)
  38. ***, Electricity tariff, www.nkmenergia.hu/foldgaz/Egyetemes-Szolgaltatas (in Hungarian)

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence