THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

DETERMINATION OF OPTIMUM INSULATION THICKNESS FOR BUILDING EXTERNAL WALLS WITH DIFFERENT INSULATION MATERIALS USING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to determine the optimum heat insulation thickness for the glasswool and rockwool insulation material. Since natural gas is mostly used for heating in Turkey, it has been selected as fuel for the calculation. In order to calculate the optimum thickness of the insulation, the number of the degree-day and total environmental factor have been used. For the optimum insulation thickness, the decrease in exergy loss, CO2 emission and the fuel consumption were 75%, 73%, and 71% for the glasswool, respectively. On the other hand, for the rockwool, they were 35%, 18%, and 43%, respectively. Optimum thickness was calculated as 0.40 m for glasswool, and 0.18 for the rockwool.
KEYWORDS
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2018-09-03
PAPER REVISED: 2018-12-04
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2018-12-10
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2019-01-13
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI180903010D
CITATION EXPORT: view in browser or download as text file
THERMAL SCIENCE YEAR 2020, VOLUME 24, ISSUE Issue 1, PAGES [303 - 311]
REFERENCES
  1. Dombaycı OA. Investigation of the effect of thermal insulation for a model house in cold regions: a case study of Turkey, Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 33 (2014) 527-537.
  2. Axaopoulos I., Axaopoulos P., Panayiotou G., Kalogirou S., Gelegeniz J. Optimal economic thickness of various insulation materials for different orientations of external walls considering the wind characteristics, Energy. 90 (2015) 939-952.
  3. Baniassadi A., Sajadi B., Amidpour M. Noori N. Economic optimization of PCM insulation layer thickness in residential buildings, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 14 (2016) 92-99.
  4. Report of outlook energy of Turkey, Bulletin of Society of Mechanicial Engineers of Turkey. (2017).
  5. Doğan H., Yılankıran N. The potential of energy efficiency and projection of Turkey, Journal of Institute of Science of University of Gazi. 3 (2015) 375-384.
  6. Dombaycı OA., Gölcü M. Pancar Y. Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy - sources, Applied Energy. 83 (2006) 921-928.
  7. Ucar A., Balo F. Determination of the energy savings and the optimum insulation thickness in the four different insulated exterior walls, Renewable Energy. 35 (2010) 88-94.
  8. Yuan J., Famham C., Emura K., Alam MA. Proposal for optimum combination of reflectivity and insulation thickness of building exterior walls for annual thermal load in Japan, Building and Environment. 103 (2016) 228-237.
  9. Kurekci NA. Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls by using heating and cooling degree-day values of all Turkey's provincial centers, Energy and Buildings. 118 (2016) 197-213.
  10. Liu X., Chen Y., Ge H., Fazio P., Chen G., Guo X. Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with moistire transfer in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Energy and Buildings. 109 (2015) 361-368.
  11. Wati E., Meukam P., Nematchoua MK. Influence of external shading on optimum insulation thickness of building walls in a tropical region, Applied Thermal Engineering. 90 (2015) 754-762.
  12. Nematchoua MK., Raminosoa CRR., Mamiharijaona R., Rene T. Orosa JA., Elvis W., Meukam P. Study of economicial and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building in a wet and hot tropical climate: Case of Cameron, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 50 (2015) 1192-1202.
  13. Axaopoulos P., Panagakis P., Axaopoulos I. Effect of wall orientation on optimum insulation thickness of a growing-finishing piggery building, Energy and Buildings. 84 (2014) 403-411.
  14. Ozel M. Determination of optimum insulation thickness based on cooling transmission load for building walls in hot climate, Energy Conversion and Management. 66 (2013) 106-114.
  15. Kaynakli O. A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16 (2012) 415-425.
  16. Ozel M. Thermal performance and optimum insulation thickness of building walls with different structure materials, Applied Thermal Engineering. 31 (2011) 3854-3863.
  17. Daouas N. A study on optimum insulation thickness in walls and energy savings in Tunisian buildings based on analytical calculation of cooling and heating transmission loads, Applied Energy. 88 (2011) 156-164.
  18. Mahlia TMI., Iqbal A. Cost benefit analysis and emission reductions of optimum thickness and air gaps for selected insulation materials for building walls in Maldives, Energy. 35 (2010) 2242-2250.
  19. Daouas N., Hassan Z., Aissia HB. Analytical periodic solution for the study of thermal performance and optimum insulation thickness of building walls in Tunisia, Applied Thermal Engineering. 30 (2010) 319-326.
  20. Dombaycı OA. The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings, Building and Environment. 42 (2007) 3855-3859.
  21. Sanea SA., Zedan MF., Ajlan S. Effect of electricity tariff on the optimum insulation- thickness in building walls as determined by a dynamic heat-transfer model. Applied Energy. 82 (2005) 313-330.
  22. Khawaja MA. Determination and selecting the optimum thickness of insulation for buildings in hot countries by accounting for solar radiation, Applied Thermal Engineering. 24 (2004) 2601-2610.
  23. Ucar A. Thermoeconomic analysis method for optimization of insulation thickness fort the four different climatic regions of Turkey, Energy. 35 (2010) 1854-1864.
  24. Hasan A. Optimizing insulation thickness for buildings using life cycle cost, Applied Energy. 63 (1999) 115-124.
  25. Çomaklı K., Yüksel B. Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving, Applied Thermal Engineering. 23 (2003) 473-479.
  26. Keçebaş A. Determination of optimum insulation thickness in pipe for exergetic life cycle assessment, Energy Conversion and Management. 105 (2015) 826-835.
  27. Pargana N., Pinheiro MD., Silvestre JD., Brito J. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings, Energy and Buildings. 82 (2014) 466-481.
  28. Schlanbusch RD., Jelle BP., Sndberg LIC., Fufa SM., Gao T. Integration of life cycle assessment in the design of hollow silica nanospheres for thermal insulation applications, Building and Environment. 80 (2014) 115-124.
  29. Gao T. Sandberg LIC., Jelle BP. Nano insulation materials: synthesis and life cycle assessment, Procedia CIRP. 15 (2014) 490-495.
  30. Özel G., Açıkkalp E., Görgün B., Yamık H. Caner N. Optimum insulation thickness determination using environmental and life cycle cost analyses based entransy approach, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 11 (2015) 87-91.
  31. Moran JM., Shapiro HN., Boettner DD., Bailey MB. Principles of Engineering Thermodynamics, Palme Yayıncılık,. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2012.
  32. Rosen MA., Dincer I. Effect of varying dead-state properties on energy and exergy analyses of thermal systems, International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 43 (2004) 121-133.
  33. Çengel YA., Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, Palme Yayıncılık, McGraw Hill Inc., 2013.

© 2024 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International licence